What effect would there be on the Battle of Britain if instead of the Hurricane/Spitfire the Brits had the Bf109 and the Germans the Hurricane/Spitfire?
What effect would there be on the Battle of Britain if instead of the Hurricane/Spitfire the Brits had the Bf109 and the Germans the Hurricane/Spitfire?
What effect would there be on the Battle of Britain if instead of the Hurricane/Spitfire the Brits had the Bf109 and the Germans the Hurricane/Spitfire?
What effect would there be on the Battle of Britain if instead of the Hurricane/Spitfire the Brits had the Bf109 and the Germans the Hurricane/Spitfire?
Nope all characteristics must remain the same ...The flight characteristics wouldn't be quite the same - RAF 109s would presumably lack the direct injection systems used in the Luftwaffe, and conversely German Spitfires and Hurricanes would have FI, rather than the gravity carburettors of IOTL.
There is also the consideration that the Bf109 armament was more suited to shooting down bombers ... another plus for the RAF if they had the Bf109.So British 100% Bf109E v German 40% Spitfires and 60% Hurricanes if the Luftwaffe squadrons are equipped in the same proportion as the British.
The Spitifre and Bf109E were on balance about equal and on balance the Bf1109E was superior to the Hurricane so the British have a clearer victory.
A secondary considerations is that the Bf109 was easier to make than the Spitfire. I don't know if it was easier to make than the Hurricane, but the Hurricane was easier to make than the Spitfire. I don't know, but sususpect that the Air Ministry placed initial production orders for 300 Spitifires and 600 Hurricanes instead of 900 Spitfires because the Hurricane was more likely to be delivered closer to schedule.
Also the Germans bombed the Supermarine factory IOTL and IIRC the Castle Bromwich factory hadn't come on stream. That would be less of a problem with the swap because the Bf109E would be being built instead of Hurricanes by Gloster and Hawker.
Why would this go in ASB??And this should be in ASB...
And this should be in ASB...
There is also the consideration that the Bf109 armament was more suited to shooting down bombers ... another plus for the RAF if they had the Bf109.
Hurricanes were not better bomber destroyers ... what you might be referring to is the fact that during the BoB Hurricane squadrons were sent against bomber formation whilst Spitfire squadrons were sent to take on the fighters.IIRC the Hurricane was considered a better bomber destroyer than the Spitfire so probably an improvement of 40% in that characteristic. However, I included things like the above when I said that on balance the Spitfire and Bf109 were equal and that the Hurricane was inferior.
In which case I think you need to get a grip .... this is a genuine question.My Sealion senses are tingling...
Hurricanes were not better bomber destroyers ... what you might be referring to is the fact that during the BoB Hurricane squadrons were sent against bomber formation whilst Spitfire squadrons were sent to take on the fighters.
Okay I'll agree with all that but it still didn't have the punch of the Bf109.No I wasn't. The Hurricane was a steadier gun platform than the Spifire and the concentration of the armament in two groups of four was superior to the layout in the Spifire. IIRC it was also easier to reload between sorties so the turnaround was faster.
Also the Hurricane had its armament upgraded sooner and the upgraded armament was heavier with the 12 machine gun Mk IIB and four cannon Mk IIC.
Okay I'll agree with all that but it still didn't have the punch of the Bf109.