The POD that America remains completely neutral. So no Lend-Lease to the Allies and no Embargo on Japan. In the Europe Nazis capture Moscow seperating the Soviet transportation from Northern, Southern and Eastern Russia. This results in those seperated regions being conquered one by one and Nazi Germany expanding up to the A–A line while Central Asia becomes independent and Nazi ally. The extermination of all non Germans in Nazi territory east of Germany goes in full swing killings hundreds of millions. Now Wehrmacht turns south conquering the entire Middle East and Africa. Without the Embargo Japan conquers Burma cutting off Allied supplies to China along the Burma Road. Now Sichuan is invaded and China too. More than 150 millions Chinese are enslaved to extract China's resources for Japan. Tens of millions die in horrible working conditions. Now to make Japan independent of trade with the rest of the world and bypass the British blockade Axis build a transcontinental railway along an oil and gas pipeline from Middle East to China along Central Asia.
 
Why doesn't the US support China? The isolationist supported supporting China against Japan because of the American interests in China, economic, religious, and the US taking on the idea of them being a special project that was the US's to help them.
 
Why doesn't the US support China? The isolationist supported supporting China against Japan because of the American interests in China, economic, religious, and the US taking on the idea of them being a special project that was the US's to help them.
No the Embargo was response only to the Japanese invasion of Vietnam which seen as threat to American Phillipines
 
One small point that springs to my mind when I read such large scale Nazi territorial expansion is where and how they get the men to carry it out and police the conquered territories
 
No the Embargo was response only to the Japanese invasion of Vietnam which seen as threat to American Phillipines
That was not singular act. That was a build up from the start of the War between Japan and China. Look back to the attack on the USS Panay in 37 where Japan went so far as to not only pay an indemnity to the US but to have a Emperor level apology issued to the US to keep the US from declaring war on them. You had the China lobby in the US that would vote to aid China in ways that they did not or would not vote for helping the Allies in WW 2. Look at the AVG group that whole purpose was to defend China from the aircraft of Japan and that was not a response to the Japanese taking Indochina from the the Vichy French government but solely being help for the Nationalists.
You also had the Germans supporting the Nationalists in China until the tripartite treaty was signed.
Stalin supported the Nationalist over Mao's CCP in China with supplies material and economic aid with Operation Zet.
 
The pact with Japan was born of expedience not mutual respect and common strategic goals. The nazis had no reason to support Japan after conquest, and didn't regard them as Aryans, so they will still be on the 'ignore, exploit or exterminate' list after a nazi victory.

So I can't see an oil pipeline being built.
 
Just because the US didn’t want to get into a war with Germany in Europe dont confuse that with the US letting Japan get away with pushing its weight around in the Pacific. Your reason for the US not placing an embargo is not solid. The US citizens had no issue with protecting there own it was sticking its nose into other people’s business that was the sticking point.
And a Japan that controls all of Eastern Asia and a ton of Pacific islands was going to be seen as a country threatNing the US.

It would be like Germany pushing to take over French territory in the Americas. Germany in Europe with no real fleet is nit viewed as a concern to us citizens Germany with a large fleet and bases in the Caribbean and or central/South America… that is a a threat to the US. We see this with the USSR. What was the one time that the US drew a line and said NO to the USSR? Cuba.

Now if Japan wants to kerp what it had in China and then invade the USSR then US citizens would not care to much. (Of course that can’t really be done but..) However it is a different story if they expand into areas that threaten the US and if they take all that and are as big a navy as they were or bigger then the US will view them as a danger and the government will embargo them at the very least and they will do it pretty much on OTL schedule
 

Garrison

Donor
The POD that America remains completely neutral. So no Lend-Lease to the Allies and no Embargo on Japan. In the Europe Nazis capture Moscow seperating the Soviet transportation from Northern, Southern and Eastern Russia. This results in those seperated regions being conquered one by one and Nazi Germany expanding up to the A–A line while Central Asia becomes independent and Nazi ally. The extermination of all non Germans in Nazi territory east of Germany goes in full swing killings hundreds of millions. Now Wehrmacht turns south conquering the entire Middle East and Africa. Without the Embargo Japan conquers Burma cutting off Allied supplies to China along the Burma Road. Now Sichuan is invaded and China too. More than 150 millions Chinese are enslaved to extract China's resources for Japan. Tens of millions die in horrible working conditions. Now to make Japan independent of trade with the rest of the world and bypass the British blockade Axis build a transcontinental railway along an oil and gas pipeline from Middle East to China along Central Asia.
Okay what exactly is your goal in posting this? Unless you really just wanted to repeat the greatest naziwank hits one more time? You haven't offered up any questions to answer nor have you suggested a scenario to make the list of near impossible items you describe come true.
 

Garrison

Donor
No the Embargo was response only to the Japanese invasion of Vietnam which seen as threat to American Phillipines
Except the embargo was in place well before that. It was extended because of the Japanese invasion of Indochina, which were a direct threat to US interests as you recognize, but it had been enacted at least a year earlier.
 
One small point that springs to my mind when I read such large scale Nazi territorial expansion is where and how they get the men to carry it out and police the conquered territories
In this case, if your talking central aisan "Stan regions", the Germans setup friendly puppet states, and locals do most of the work and the German garrisons can be small.

Mideast and even India could be this way too, although it would be easy to screw up places like Egypt, a food provider at the time, starving people tend to revolt.

Even in places like France there were locals willing to help, if the Germans have won there will be much more of this.

Even in the brutalized regions of the Ukraine plenty of "willing to help people" OTL, the Germans will have to curb their worst tendencies, because the need the dudes to extract resources.
 
One small point that springs to my mind when I read such large scale Nazi territorial expansion is where and how they get the men to carry it out and police the conquered territories
Hitler wanted a standing army of 1.5-2 million German soldiers in Eastern Europe after the war on top of however many Axis soldiers aiding in Generalplan Ost. They would serve 12 years and once finished some would be given farms as reward.
 
In this case, if your talking central aisan "Stan regions", the Germans setup friendly puppet states, and locals do most of the work and the German garrisons can be small.

Mideast and even India could be this way too, although it would be easy to screw up places like Egypt, a food provider at the time, starving people tend to revolt.

Even in places like France there were locals willing to help, if the Germans have won there will be much more of this.

Even in the brutalized regions of the Ukraine plenty of "willing to help people" OTL, the Germans will have to curb their worst tendencies, because the need the dudes to extract resources.
Even in the Ukraine , Poland and the Balkans this did not turn out to be viable medium term though. The local Nationalists quickly realised that they would be the next targets and formed third party partisan groups. Increase the size of your occupied territories massively as in this thread and the chaos just gets much bigger and less controllable , possibly to a point when it's just not worth having nominal control over it.
 
Hitler wanted a standing army of 1.5-2 million German soldiers in Eastern Europe after the war on top of however many Axis soldiers aiding in Generalplan Ost. They would serve 12 years and once finished some would be given farms as reward.
What the Fuhrer wants the Fuhrer gets even if it's a totally unrealistic and stupid idea. 1.5 to 2 million men busy in the east isn't going to be doing a lot of good for the German homeland's industrial base when most of the work will be done by totally inefficient and un co- operative slaves or POW's. The qualitative output of German industry had noticeably fell as soon as these policies were put into effect so to make it a long term plan seems to be rather insane really.
 
You are still not going to get the US to just drop all economic, political, and religious ties to China and other areas in the Far East.
 
Top