Here is the revised (though still pretty crappy) map as of late Summer, 1945.
I think I am going to cancel the earlier version as it does not actually reflect any actual stage of the TL in the light of the new updates. I included the area of Neiva, in Colombia, in the Incan-controlled territory, even if it is not mentioned in the posts, as I chose to consider extant division everywhere it makes sense if not otherwise indicated: the line indicated actually divides at least two, possibly three departments of Colombia into two; an Incan annexation in Argentina on the basis of provincial borders would not have made any sense IMHO; likewise, it is implied that Chile's Region Metropolitana, or whatever it was called at the time, is split between Incan countryside and Argentine-occupied Santiago. Otherwise, I stuck to extant state and primary division borders. However, I can change any of that if DValdron says otherwise.
For instance, the area immedately south of where I put the border in Chile has a significant Mapuche population like the area on the other side, but it used to be a part of a larger region that, overall, is very much dominated by white settlers. Moreover, as said in a previous post, I actually added Auracania region to the Empire on my own initiative, without any mention of the Mapuche position in the war through TL (or did I miss it?). The southern border in Chile should be therefore considered as an educated guess.
The Incans were operating from the highlands and coasts. It is unlikely they'd have taken significant parts of Colombia's eastern provinces, unless those could only be accessed from the Colombian southeast. Which is to say, Colombia can probably keep almost all of its Amazon bits.
As for the Mapuche, DValdron specifically mentioned one of the biggest Argentine gains was that it put distance between the Incans and the Mapuche. So splitting the Mapuche doesn't really fit. The border should probably be north of there.
Also, didn't he say the Argentines had the rail line into Santiago as well? To me that implied a contiguous territorial bridge to the city.
I'd say the fact he called it "perfect" makes it canon, man.![]()
I'd say the fact he called it "perfect" makes it canon, man.
Here's a worlda version in 1961 or so:
View attachment 222168
Tourism, money laundering, sale of passports, mail fraud, you name it.
Maybe someone should to a Timeline about these Islands. They do seem to attract attention.
Wow, the southern half of Colombia being taken by the Incas. How are cities like Cali, Bogotá and Medellín going after whatever happened there?![]()
I'd say the fact he called it "perfect" makes it canon, man.
Here's a worlda version in 1961 or so:
View attachment 222168
Guatemala is the Mayan color following the (perhaps short-lived) revolution. Cuba and the DR get the Soviet satellite colors, though perhaps that is a bit unjustified since the Aztecs probably mitigate Soviet influence significantly.What do the colors of Guatemala, Cuba and the Dominican Republic mean?
Guatemala is the Mayan color following the (perhaps short-lived) revolution. Cuba and the DR get the Soviet satellite colors, though perhaps that is a bit unjustified since the Aztecs probably mitigate Soviet influence significantly.
A looong long story.
A one liner necro on a FOUR YEAR dead thread?Just finished the first page. I don't usually read anything but agricultural timelines, and especially not post-1900 ones, except the occasional ISOT, but this has grabbed my attention.