Austria-Hungary survives WW1 and interwar years.

Oh wow, I really like that. What was that model called? Would it be mass producible by 1940? I think Hurricanes would arrive to supplement the air force before these fighters can enter mass production. In this scenario the ones that went to Finland would have probably been more useful to the AH's and Poles. I know that PZL had prototypes and designs for contemporary monoplanes by the time of the invasion of Poland.

As for the B-534 I meant no disrespect. It was probably the best biplane fighter ever produced, I was using the BF-109 E as a benchmark for obsolescence, so really only considering low wing monoplanes. In experienced hands I can imagine the B-534's agility causing trouble for 109s and it'd probably still give the 110 a run for its money.

I think the K.u.K would be fascinating in general with squadrons from all over the empire, but probably dominated by the Czechs who would probably specialise in aviation. I believe they were already license building Amiots in 1938 so not a stretch to see them take on other French designs either.

Hm, as for the oil supplies, I considered getting the USSR involved in Poland, but in this scenario with Poland better able to resist and another ally in eastern Europe the Allies would be unable to admit anything other than being at war with the Soviet Union, and I think that the USSR and allies probably would have little appetite to have to commit to a full blown war with each other. Also, I think that the Nazi hatred for Russia and Communists might be a road block for a long term military alliance. What do you think?

I just imagine Romania to be trying their hardest to stay neutral and appease all sides as they did in OT in 1940. I think they'd probably have more sympathy to Poland and AH despite old grudges with the latter and might have more leeway to assist in some way without committing to war. All it'd take would be for the Ussr to join Germany and strategically Romania would be done for.

As for A-H markings, that would make for some interesting illustrations.
In 1939 theoretically B-135 could be entering service. Especially with bigger military/ economy behind the orders. OTL B-35 (not rectable gear) flew in September 1938. After Munich everything was downgraded but B-135 with retractable gears flew in 1939.

As to B-534, Slovak B-534 shot plane down in 1944 and Slovak used them in USSR in 1941.
109Es would be only entering production/ service in September 1939, wouldn’t they? Majority would be B, C, Ds.

Czechs were license building Bloch MB-200. Waste of money in my opinion and in 1938 started to built Soviet SB-2s. However Potez as well as Blenheim were considered and Czech Aero A-300 prototype was built in 1938.

Yes, OTL Poland and Romania were allied in defense against USSR.

Also wouldn’t borders with Germany be fortified as OTL Czechoslovak? With Czech-Austrian internal border being not issue A-H would have much bigger reserves. Especially with addition of Polish front German would be hard pressed to really advence so much as you described.

OTL they were planning to pincer Czechoslovakia from Vienna and from Silesia. And Czechoslovaks had some mobile reserves for this. Here border is much shorter and mountainous.
Honestly I think A-H should be doing much better. Especially if Romanians are indeed not belligerent towards A-H.
 
I'm sort of trying to draw some parallels with the Soviet union, as in a fairly large nation with pre war internal problems and military issues (in the SU, the purges, in AH a limiting treaty) that still hasn't fully recovered from said issues by the start of the war, but modernised and strengthens significantly later.

Also, Romania aren't belligerent YET, but I think a pro axis government would come to power faster and with more popular support than OT due to the stab in the back over transylvania.
 
I'm sort of trying to draw some parallels with the Soviet union, as in a fairly large nation with pre war internal problems and military issues (in the SU, the purges, in AH a limiting treaty) that still hasn't fully recovered from said issues by the start of the war, but modernised and strengthens significantly later.

Also, Romania aren't belligerent YET, but I think a pro axis government would come to power faster and with more popular support than OT due to the stab in the back over transylvania.
Everything depends how would A-H try to solve their internal problems. OTL in late 1918 Budapest was already promising autonomy to Slovaks for example. If something like this happened ITL and year sooner with war ending 1917 I guess support for A-H would be better. Not sure though if Hungarians would offer it if they were not desperate.

Also OTL dissolution of A-H led to old economic ties being ripped. Economically everybody lost due to new borders and tax barriers. So Central Europe can be economically much better.


Romania however have problem. Soviet Union on the border. How would they deal with Soviet request to cede Bessarabia? And be in same time belligerent towards A-H?
 
Czech and Slovak POW in part formed Legions in Russia as well as Italy. However on home front they were serving till last day. They were some rebellions, like parts of “Slovak” 71st Regiment “Trencsen” in Bosna. However desertions from frontlines were I believe rare.

Slovack deserter give the italian plan and formation for both the offensive in 16 and the Caporetto one...and naturally nobody believed them
 
Slovack deserter give the italian plan and formation for both the offensive in 16 and the Caporetto one...and naturally nobody believed them
First time I heard that. Any details please?
To 1 deserter with valuable information there were some 400000 people from territory of today Slovakia, from them app 280K Slovaks of which over 60000 K were KIA for Monarchy.

Well, sure there were more deserters and even more who switched sides as POWs. Slovaks (or Czechs) didn’t shared excitement over war against Serbia which was common among Austrians or Hungarians, this however
 
First time I heard that. Any details please?

italian wiki on both case, but the gist is that the language barrier and the top brass believing that they were here to spread disinformation dismissed (or greatly understimated) what their said...both times
 
italian wiki on both case, but the gist is that the language barrier and the top brass believing that they were here to spread disinformation dismissed (or greatly understimated) what their said...both times
I would be curious from which regiment guy was. Strange it was never mentioned as one of examples of Slovak anti Habsburg feeling in Czechoslovakia.

We had example from iur village where guy and his squad wanted to surrender to Italian platton or two and end up bringing them to A-H lines. Guy was sad about it. He said what else he could do. There were more Italians with guns who wanted to surrender. Basically they marched them into A-H lines under Italian bayonets.
 
I would be curious from which regiment guy was. Strange it was never mentioned as one of examples of Slovak anti Habsburg feeling in Czechoslovakia.

I was wrong, it was Czech, Anton Krecht a liutement...that basically give up the entire deployment of the Strafexpedition
 
A few general thought

I lean toward Austria would be more likely to go fascist than federalize in a Austria-Hungary survive scenario. In fact I think Austria would use the Communist revolt in Hungary to remove Hungarian autonomy, while at the same time creating new Länder based on languages. But at the same time I think that Austrian fascism would be far more transnational rather than nationalistic and would push increased right for the population to use their own language. I also think that a fascist Austria would heavily invest and reform the army, and build a pan-Austrian identity around the army as a unifying factor, much as the monarchy was earlier (it’s still a unifying factor, but it will decrease in importance). To large extent I think Interbellum Italy/Hungary would be the model for how fascist Austria would function, just with a greater respect for minority rights.

As for Hitler I think without the hypocrisy about national autonomy for everyone except Germans and Hungarians, Nazism will have a much harder time rising. Demand for Sudetenland will be seen as a joke and enjoy little support in Sudetenland. A surviving Austria will also mean that there won’t be the multitude of small East/central European states dealing with Germany, instead we will have large Germany, a slightly smaller Austria and a smaller Poland dominating Central Europe.
 
Top