ATL election maps

I don't remember who from AH.com members say it, but:
Blue is for aristocracy Republicans, Red is for Commie Democrats.

Here is my maps with results:

1912
William H.Taft/Nicholas M.Butler(R) 50.6%, 340 EV
Woodrow Wilson/Thomas Marshall(D) 41.8%,191 EV
Eugene V.Debs/Emil Seidel(S) 6% , 0 EV
1916
Charles E.Hughes/Warren G.Harding(R) 50.8 %, 466 EV
Thomas Marshall/James M.Cox(D) 49.2%, 65 EV
1920
James M.Cox/Franklin D.Roosevelt(D) 60.3%, 307 EV
Charles E.Hughes/Warren G.Harding(R) 39.7%, 224 EV
1924
James M.Cox/Franklin D.Roosevelt(D) 29.4% , 269 EV
Hiram Johnson/Robert M. LaFolette(R) 70.6% , 262 EV
1928
Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis(R) 58.2% , 512 EV
Al Smith/Joseph Taylor Robinson(D) 41.8% , 19 EV
1932
Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis(R) 42.6% ,318 EV
Al Smith/Albert Ritchie(D) 57.4% ,213 EV
1936
Franklin D.Roosevelt/John Nance Garner(D) 60.8% , 184 EV
Alf Landon/Frank Knox(R) 39.2% , 347 EV
1940

Franklin D.Roosevelt/John Nance Garner(D) 54.7% , 109 EV
Wendell Wilkie/Charles L.McNary(R) 45.3% , 422 EV
1944
Thomas Dewey/John W.Bricker(R) 46.6% , 436 EV
Harry Truman/Henry Wallace(D) 53.4% , 95 EV
1948

Thomas Dewey/John W.Bricker(R) 48.0% , 501 EV
Henry Wallace/Alben W.Barkley(D) 49.6% , 4 EV
Strom Thurmond/Fielding L.Wright(Dix) 2.4% , 26 EV
1952
Adlai Stevenson/John Sparkman(D) 55.7% , 113 EV
Dwight D.Eisenhower/Richard M.Nixon(R) 44.3% , 418 EV
1956
Adlai Stevenson/John Sparkman(D) 57.4% , 420 EV
Christian Herter/Harold Stassen(R) 42.6% , 111 EV
1960
Richard M.Nixon/Nelson Rockfeller(R) 50.3% , 509 EV
John F.Kennedy/Lyndon B.Johnson(D) 49.7% , 28 EV
1964
Richard M.Nixon/Nelson Rockefeller(R) 61.1% , 428 EV
Lyndon B.Johnson/Hubert H.Humphrey(D) 38.9% , 109 EV
1968
Ronald W.Reagan/George H.W.Bush(R) 43.8% , 469 EV
Lyndon B.Johnson/Edmund S.Muskie(D) 42.7% , 40 EV
George Wallace/Curtis LeMay(AIP) 13.5% , 28 EV
1972
Ronald W.Reagan/George H.W.Bush(R) 62.5% , 533 EV
Hubert H.Humphrey/George McGovern(D) 37.5% , 3 EV
John Hospers/Theodora Nathan(L) 0%, 1 EV
1976
Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale(D) 50.1% , 426 EV
Nelson Rockfeller/Bob Dole(R) 49.9% , 111 EV
1980
Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale(D) 57.3% , 270 EV
George H.W.Bush/John B.Anderson(R) 42.7% , 267 EV
1984
Walter Mondale/Geraldine Ferraro(D) 59.4% , 381 EV
Gerald Ford/Richard Schweiker(R) 40.6% , 156 EV
1988
George H.W.Bush/Dan Quayle(R) 54.3% , 512 EV
Walter Mondale/Geraldine Ferraro(D) 45.7% , 25 EV
1992
George H.W.Bush/Dan Quayle(R) 56.4% , 322 EV
Bill Clinton/Jerry Brown(D) 43.6% , 215 EV
1996
Bob Dole/Jack Kemp(R) 49.1% , 474 EV
Bob Casey/Al Gore(D) 50.9% , 63 EV
2000
Al Gore/Joe Lieberman(D) 48.4% , 458 EV
Bob Dole/Jack Kemp(R) 51.6% , 79 EV
2004
Al Gore/Joe Lieberman(D) 50.7% , 212 EV
John McCain/Lamar Alexander(R) 49.3% , 325 EV
2008
Joe Lieberman/Hillary Clinton(D) 45.7% , 267 EV
Ron Paul/Sarah Palin(R) 54.3% , 270 EV
 
Last edited:
Before WWI the colors are reversed because the ideologies are reversed from what they are today. In the 1920s there was a broad bipartisan economic consensus outside of free trade/protectionism (similar to the UK during the last 20 years of the 20th century), that disintegrated when the progressives seized control of the Democratic Party under Smith and FDR. By 1932 the Dem realignment was complete. The GOP had flipped after WWI when they nominated Harding and especially Coolidge, the most economically liberal president till Reagan.
 
Mmmm... My POD was 1912 - TR Doesn't accept participation in elections - but GOP accepts "Contract with People" as their official programme.
 
Not much thought was put into this yet, but POD: Pete Wilson does not seek the GOP nomination for president in 1996, waiting instead until 2000. Reservations among fiscal conservatives then costs Governor Bush the 2000 nomination, which instead goes to Wilson who shuts Bush down in South Carolina after a win for Wilson in the New Hampshire primary. McCain's decision not to run due to butterflies costs Gore the Democratic nomination:
genusmap.php

Wilson/Voinovich: 318 EVs
Bradley/Graham: 220 EVs
 
Last edited:
thanks probably not, then again most of my maps past 1980 probably weren't either.

The states make sense, but the margins by which those states fall is odd, and I'm not sure a ticket led by a Jew and supported by an African-American would have been viewed as viable.
 

JoeMulk

Banned
The states make sense, but the margins by which those states fall is odd, and I'm not sure a ticket led by a Jew and supported by an African-American would have been viewed as viable.

I was just going by the margins of the original maps from the same years, I didn't realize that they could be changed.
 
I was just going by the margins of the original maps from the same years, I didn't realize that they could be changed.

It's quite helpful to be able to change them, I've found. On my 2000 I've assumed that Bradley's record as a liberal legislator undermines much of Nader's support, thus none of the states are as close as they were in our timeline's 2000 election.
 
Top