Why do you not like either outcomeSo, in other words, either Teddy Valiant is not dead, or Bob Hoskins is only in the movie for a quick flashback sequence. I don't like either of these outcomes.
Why do you not like either outcomeSo, in other words, either Teddy Valiant is not dead, or Bob Hoskins is only in the movie for a quick flashback sequence. I don't like either of these outcomes.
Because I think that you shouldn't tamper with Bob Hoskins as Eddie Valiant. His role as Mario in the 1993 movie however? THAT role can be tampered with for sure! If the movie even gets made, that is.Why do you not like either outcome
Very well either of my first choises can be teddy vaillantBecause I think that you shouldn't tamper with Bob Hoskins as Eddie Valiant. His role as Mario in the 1993 movie however? THAT role can be tampered with for sure! If the movie even gets made, that is.
Still, it's just my own opinion. You don't have to take it seriously.
I'd go with Bill Murray as Teddy Valiant.Very well either of my first choises can be teddy vaillant
I agree.Because I think that you shouldn't tamper with Bob Hoskins as Eddie Valiant.
Actually, if you know about the behind-the-scenes trainwreck that the production of that movie was, it's pretty easy to have the movie turn out actually good.His role as Mario in the 1993 movie however? THAT role can be tampered with for sure! If the movie even gets made, that is.
More like "Daisy" or "Rosalina" since Hildy was supposed to be Luigi's crush rather than Mario's...Just change Hildy's name to Peach, or even Toadstool
With these two suggestions in mind, how about we have Daisy as her given name, and Peach as her royal name? I mean, seeing as though Daisy was made to recreate Peach when Super Mario Land was in development, I feel like that would be an accurate portrayal of both characters.More like "Daisy" or "Rosalina" since Hildy was supposed to be Luigi's crush rather than Mario's...
Although "Peach Toadstool" could be a "royal name" rather than her given name.
Agreed.The only major complaint I have casting frickin' Dolly Parton as Belle in Beauty & the Beast.
I don't hate her, but I'm not really a fan either, and I think she's totally wrong for the role.
As much as I love Burt Reynolds, I have a hard time hearing him as the Beast too.
If it's no trouble at all, can we see what George Lucas's filmography is like ITTL?George Lucas's divorce with Marcia Griffin has corporate raiders salivating over the dream of carving up George's filmmaking empire piece by piece.
Thank you for considering my random cockamanie idea for a standalone Woody Woodpecker film!Corey Burton as Dinky Doodle
Behind the Laughter is a mockumentary that begins with famed journalist Walter Cronkite visiting the Universal lot to conduct a fake interview with Walter Lantz. The viewers learn that Woody and fellow toons Andy Panda and Chilly Willy were once a trio that got along great. We later find out that over time, Woody became greedy and began to hog the spotlight from the other two, prompting a breakup of the trio as they struggle to navigate a rapidly changing animation landscape. Buzz Buzzard and Wally Walrus were once worthy adversaries to Woody, but they were no match for Woody's greatest villain; himself.
That is so random and unexpected that I just have to agree with it!Alice Roosevelt had a snake named Emily Spinach. When I heard that, my first thought was "that sounds like the name of a kids' book character". So why not? I would have Rosemary Wells (Max & Ruby, Timothy Goes To School) write the books, and have either Nelvana (producer of all OTL adaptations of her work) or CINAR (OTL producer of Arthur) make a cartoon adaptation.
At least the OTL English dub of Sonic X gave us the best voice for Knuckles and the second-best voice for Robotnik/Eggman.More anime is always a good thing IMHO, provided the translation is done well and the story isn't butchered in localization.
*cough*SonicX*coughcough*
I agree.
Actually, if you know about the behind-the-scenes trainwreck that the production of that movie was, it's pretty easy to have the movie turn out actually good.
Which is a shame, because the cast was great and if the movie had been good (which if they'd kept with the earlier drafts of the script it could've been), they'd've fit the characters really well.
This video explains it better than I can:
And here's the site that archives the older drafts:
https://www.smbmovie.com/SMBArchive/preproduction/script.htm
I definitely would keep the OTL cast mostly as-is. I do like the idea of an Oz-like setting closer to the games.I looked at the older drafts, and given what little of an explanation 80's kids gathered as to how Mario and Luigi wound up in the Mushroom Kingdom, most especially the intro to The Super Mario Bros.(Not the Super Show intro, but the intro to the actual animated series.), I actually think that the Oz-esque storyline they considered at first would have fit it better than an alternate universe where men evolved from reptiles.
Think about it! Just change Hildy's name to Peach, or even Toadstool if you want to be more faithful to the English translation, make Mario a bit more joyful, and perhaps find a way to hint at Wart or the Koopalings for a potential sequel, and the movie could be as successful as the OTL final rendition of Sonic the Hedgehog!
Heck, considering how OTL!Disney was banking on the movie to let Nintendo into the Disney Parks, with a plot like its first known draft, after the changes I suggested, we could possibly be riding through Slippy Toad's Wild Ride while chomping down on some delicious banana smoothies from DK Island by now!
More like "Daisy" or "Rosalina" since Hildy was supposed to be Luigi's crush rather than Mario's...
Although "Peach Toadstool" could be a "royal name" rather than her given name.
I definitely like the idea of Luigi getting the girl instead of Mario himself.With these two suggestions in mind, how about we have Daisy as her given name, and Peach as her royal name? I mean, seeing as though Daisy was made to recreate Peach when Super Mario Land was in development, I feel like that would be an accurate portrayal of both characters.
I'm picturing a cartoon snake wearing a sweater and big eyeglasses. Just for the maximum cute factor.That is so random and unexpected that I just have to agree with it!
Sounds like a fair compromise to me.I definitely would keep the OTL cast mostly as-is. I do like the idea of an Oz-like setting closer to the games.
I'd have Mario start out pretty curmudgeonly. He effectively had to raise Luigi on his own. But after they get transported to the Mushroom Kingdom he starts to lighten up in the fantasy kingdom. He should let out at least one joyful "Yahoo!".
Nintendoland brought to you by Disney sounds like a great idea.
I definitely like the idea of Luigi getting the girl instead of Mario himself.
So she'd be born Daisy and be known as Princess Peach Toadstool.
I'm picturing a cartoon snake wearing a sweater and big eyeglasses. Just for the maximum cute factor.
While I love Dan Green as an actor, I actually think his Knuckles (especially during Sonic X in particular) wasn't the best; it was a bit too commanding and authoritative for someone who's spent his whole life alone until getting dragged into an adventure by outsiders...At least the OTL English dub of Sonic X gave us the best voice for Knuckles
Out of curiousity, who's your first-best?and the second-best voice for Robotnik/Eggman.
I don't think that's even a question, Disney's Imagineers have never lacked for quality.it would be amazing if the Imagineers manage to match that in terms of quality.
Well, that gives me a good deal of hope for the quality of a Nintendo-themed expansion to a Disney Park.I don't think that's even a question, Disney's Imagineers have never lacked for quality.
....At least when a given attraction was new...just how long it takes for whatever they come up with to get dated is another matter entirely...and to be fair, a lot of the old stuff just needs a good refurbishing and a fresh coat of paint.