Arabella Stuart Named Heir to the English Throne 1603

Point of Divergence ... As Elizabeth Tudor approached the time of her death, people began to speculate as to who would succeed her to the throne. The assumption was that Elizabeth would name James the VI of Scotland as her successor. But there was another possible successor to the throne, Arabella Stuart, who was the great great granddaughter of Henry the VII. It should be noted that although she was a possible successor, Arabella, unlike her Grey relatives, did not have designs on the crown or the desire to be queen. It was probably this lack of desire for the throne, combined with the pushing of the Cecil family, that Elizabeth named James the VI as her heir. Once James was on the throne, plots were made to place Arabella on the throne. To Arabella's credit though, she dutifully reported the plot to her king once she was invited to take part and refused. Despite this, a marriage by Arabella to William Seymour in 1610, who was also a possible heir to the throne, did not go unnoticed by James, who had Arabella and William thrown into prison. Arabella and William attempted to escape England, but only William was successful. Arabella was captured by English forces and was thrown into the Tower of London. She never saw her husband again and died in 1615 due to refusing to eat.

Lets say that history had taken another turn. An ambitious Arabella Stuart wishes to be named as Elizabeth's heir. Supported by the Cecil family, Arabella is named by Elizabeth as her successor upon her death bed in 1603. A 28 year old Arabella becomes Queen Arabella of England. Discuss how Arabella becoming Queen of England changes history, and what the impact on the future would be.
 
AFAIK it wasn't so much that Elizabeth NAMED James as her successor as that Cecil stage-managed the whole thing. Liz was loathe to name a successor so she kept everyone guessing. James was simply the logical choice (male, seniority etc) as opposed to a Queen Arbella or a King William III (who were junior to James' claim) who might have to fight off a Scots invasion in the event they succeeded.
 

TruthfulPanda

Gone Fishin'
The Wildlings (they live to the north of the Wall) were capable of a march on Lodon?
Install Arabella in 1600 and crown her while Bess is still alive. That makes a coup by the King Beyond the Wall difficult.
 
Install Arabella in 1600 and crown her while Bess is still alive. That makes a coup by the King Beyond the Wall difficult.

Why on earth would the crown Arbella in Liz's lifetime? 1) Liz's whole personality would not allow such a thing to happen; and 2) no English heir has been crowned in the predecessors' lifetime since Henry II's eldest son in 1170, why would they suddenly do so now? 3) I have no idea when Cecil decided on James as the lesser of several evils, but I'm sure it'd be easier to remove the younger Cecil from the scene after his dad died in 1598

Also, equating Scots to Wildlings is more than a little insulting.
 
Top