Archibald
Banned
When Nixon become president in november 1968 he appointed a task force on space led by Nobel-prize Charles Townes.
I found the document there. Explosive !
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4407/vol1/chapter3-3.pdf
The problem was that Thomas Paine did not followed those wise advices.
Then, Nixon created the Space Task Group "to buy time". Alas, the STG (February - September 1969) resulted in an unaffordable program. "I want it all, and I want it now" : space shuttle, space station, nuclear shuttle, mission to Mars.
You have to butterfly Thomas Paine away, maybe putting George Low (a pragmatic) instead.
So NASA follows recommandation of the Townes Panel, and focuse on more lunar exploration.
The next problem is that the Apollo hardware is not very efficient to build a lunar base.
http://www.astronautix.com/craftfam/lunbases.htm
This show the four steps planned for the Apollo lunar exploration:
1- basic Apollo lunar landings
2- AES
3- ALSS
4- LESA
This article explains why AES and ALSS are not worth the price.
Thomas Paine get's killed in WWII, or Jim Webb chose someone else late 1968, probably George Low.
Low, a cold-headed pragmatic, decides to follow Nixon transition team on space advice. Digging further, he see that LESA match exactly what Townes recommended to Nixon.
Then, on July 25 1969, Low flies with Nixon to the USS Hornet carrier, to welcome the apollo 11 crew.
While in the helicopter, Low rapidly brief Nixon on LESA. Icing on the cake, with so many Saturn V needed for LESA, "their price will drop substantially."
In september 1969 Apollo flights 11 through 20 are stretched to 1976. This give NASA time to develop LESA systems...
More on LESA here
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lesrbase.htm
I found the document there. Explosive !
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4407/vol1/chapter3-3.pdf
Outch ! No space shuttle, no space station either. More lunar exploration.What are the program items and their urgency for the immediatefitum?Various items
needing special consideration are
a. A manned space station. We are against any present commitment to the construction
of a large space station, but believe study of the possible purposes and design of such
a station should be continued.
[5] b. Apollo Applications Program. This program should proceed as a way of testing
man's role in space, of allowing a healthy continuing manned space program, and for the
biomedical and scientific information it will yield.
c. Lunar exploration. Lunar exploration after the first Apollo landing will be exciting
and valuable. But additional work needs to be initiated this year to provide for its full
exploitation by means of an adequate mobility and extended stay on the lunar surface.
d. Planetary exploration. The US. program for planetary exploration by instrumented
probes needs to be strengthened and funds for such probes increased appreciably. However,
the great majority of the task force is not in favor of a commitment at present to a
manned planetary lander or orbiter.
e. Astronomy and other sciences. The space program is important to a number of
sciences, and can be of enormous benefit to astronomy. This potential should be continuously
developed through sound and stable programs.
f. Applications of spacecraft and associated techniques for civil and commercial benefit.
We believe research and development of such applications should be supported strongly
and increased in pace. Furthermore, the new administration should give considerable
attention to their use in promoting international cooperation.
(snip)
Cost reduction , and “low cost”boosters. The unit costs of boosting payloads into space
can be substantially reduced, but this requires an increased number of flights, or such an
increase coupled with an expensive development program. We do not recommend initiation
of such a development, but study of the technical possibilities and rewards. Some cost
reductions in the space program can probably be made simply through experience and
stabilization of the level of effort, and through coordination of future NASA and DOD
programs.
The problem was that Thomas Paine did not followed those wise advices.
Then, Nixon created the Space Task Group "to buy time". Alas, the STG (February - September 1969) resulted in an unaffordable program. "I want it all, and I want it now" : space shuttle, space station, nuclear shuttle, mission to Mars.
You have to butterfly Thomas Paine away, maybe putting George Low (a pragmatic) instead.
So NASA follows recommandation of the Townes Panel, and focuse on more lunar exploration.
The next problem is that the Apollo hardware is not very efficient to build a lunar base.
http://www.astronautix.com/craftfam/lunbases.htm
This show the four steps planned for the Apollo lunar exploration:
1- basic Apollo lunar landings
2- AES
3- ALSS
4- LESA
This article explains why AES and ALSS are not worth the price.
LESA is the way to go.Evans noted that the AES and ALSS cargo delivery systems would be "inherently inefficient" because astronauts would need to travel to the moon to deliver the automated cargo lander. This meant that the mass of the CSM systems needed for crew support and Earth return (life support, lunar-orbit departure propellant, reentry heatshield, and parachutes) would need to be subtracted from the mass of the payload that could be delivered to the moon's surface.
The fourth program of lunar exploration, Lunar Exploration Systems for Apollo (LESA), avoided this inefficiency.
Thomas Paine get's killed in WWII, or Jim Webb chose someone else late 1968, probably George Low.
Low, a cold-headed pragmatic, decides to follow Nixon transition team on space advice. Digging further, he see that LESA match exactly what Townes recommended to Nixon.
Then, on July 25 1969, Low flies with Nixon to the USS Hornet carrier, to welcome the apollo 11 crew.
While in the helicopter, Low rapidly brief Nixon on LESA. Icing on the cake, with so many Saturn V needed for LESA, "their price will drop substantially."
In september 1969 Apollo flights 11 through 20 are stretched to 1976. This give NASA time to develop LESA systems...
More on LESA here
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lesrbase.htm
Last edited: