I don't think you need to have the RN be too hesitant... from what I've read, they were supremely confident that they could do the job, and quickly...
nice touch with the storm. That's one thing everyone forgets about... just how much Mother Nature screwed up damn near everyone's plans off the American coasts. When it comes to wars like this, everyone just plots out which ships go where.... when you read a history of the naval war in the ACW, storms were actually pretty significant; the Monitor was lost in one, after all...
I didn't think the Irish question would be all that important or affect the war much... just a point of idle curiosity. As for the war out west... is there any great need for one? Won't the war pretty much be over by the time the Brits assemble enough men and materials way out there?
From “Milne’s Fury”
It was Lee who signed the treaty allowing the Royal Navy to use Portsmouth Naval Base in Virginia as a British base, amongst others.
Would this be a "slave free" base? as i doubt that the British public would be happy about slave labour being used in a Royal Navy base. What would happen if a slave escaped in one of these bases, would the Royal Navy return the slave to their owner?
The British public didn't give a monkeys about slavery, outside of a vocal minority. The bulk of the abolishionist movement in Britain came down on the CSA's side, and Cobden and Bright were reduced to a lunatic fringe. The ACW was only an abolishionist war post-facto.
In 1862 the US and CSA allowed slavery so it was not perhaps an issue for Britain, but surely it would become one when British troops started relying on slaves for logistical support in the CSA british naval bases?
There is a difference between ignoring the slavery issue when Britain was neutral, but when Britain became involved things would change and perhaps that vocal minority against slavery would become larger?
As you said the ACW was abolitionist post-facto, but would there be an earlier emacipation proclamation if things start to go wrong for the US? as a way to put political pressure on Britain?
Well, IOTL Lincoln didn't want to look as if it was about slavery, so he kept holding off making the EP until he had a victory. IOTL this was Gettysburg, but ITTL all bets are off.
Not Gettysburg, a year earlier - Antietam.Well, IOTL Lincoln didn't want to look as if it was about slavery, so he kept holding off making the EP until he had a victory. IOTL this was Gettysburg, but ITTL all bets are off.
J
Well, IOTL Lincoln didn't want to look as if it was about slavery, so he kept holding off making the EP until he had a victory. IOTL this was Gettysburg, but ITTL all bets are off.
If Lincoln made the emancipation declaration from a position of strength IOTL would he be able to do so from a position of weakness and in desperation ITTL? If the US lose the border Union Slave states to the CSA/Britain would slavery still be such a big issue for the US?
Also a ready supply of troops for Britain would be from the West Indies, but would these black troops would be trusted to fight alongside Confederate troops, thats if the CSA allowed them in?
The US would also be able to cause mischief in the West Indian colonies if troops were raised there to fight on American soil, "in defence of slavery".
Would we have rebellions in these colonies against Britain?
After much consideration, I now think that the US would kick British butts after all, then go on to liberate Ireland.