Yikes, Vlachia just went full second serfdom.
So the Vlachs introduced serfdom into their country.
I'm not surprised at all that the Vlachs did that. Low land productivity & low population & immigration opportunities next door are all strong incentives to keep workers tied down to the land, and Vlachia's got all three.
The Imperial government likely has an entire administrative arm limiting plot sizes for rural landowners to prevent countryside revolts.
Yeah, once I started exploring the Roman-Vlach relation as presented and the implications on the ground, this was pretty much inevitable.
Fascinating update touching on corruption and economics. However, in chaos arises opportunity. Maybe Rhomaion can enact more reforms so they won't need to scramble to come up with stopgap measures for each scandal. Also, once the East and Italy is settled, one can hope for a new Imperial Arsenal so Rhomaion can reassert dominance over Mare Nostrum. Is the next update(s) going to focus on the next 2 financial scandals or are the Ethiopian and Vlach affairs considered the eponymous scandals?
Sounds like Vlachia is ready for some revolution ala Zimmermann and Asanes.
The next updates are going to be focusing on the next two scandals. The OOC reason for why the next does not is because the book that inspired much of it, and provided necessary information, was due back at the library and I needed to write it while I still had it.
Vlachia could definitely use a revolution and I’d consider it justified. Unfortunately it’d be put down by a couple of the European tagmata for threatening Constantinople’s food supply.
So Constantinople is effectively watching their neighbor and ally head down the road to being the 17th century equivalent of a third world country and pick a fight with their larger less reliable neighbor. If it continues and the Hungarians pick a fight during the reign of an aggressive emperor, we could see him decide ruling the Vlachs is easier than having to constantly subsidize and save them.
The Hungarian-Vlach relationship is definitely the weak point for Demetrios III’s post-war settlement and going to be the source of many headaches down the road. It’s like having Austria-Hungary and Italy in the same alliance.
That sounds like the kinda cold and aggressive logic our favorite heir might be in favor of. It would completely undermine the Alliance though if the two bigger members ate a smaller member. Nothing said that alliance is rock solid though.
That said there’s a need for Rome to find a new source of people to repopulate areas with and Artisans to steal. Some capital would also be nice. And while we’ve suggested Lotharingia in exile locations before Constantinople might suck up a lot of their dissidents with the offer of free land, better paying jobs, and saftey from Triune raids. That’s only a temporary fix though. Eventually the population will likely grow used to triune rule. Long term though repopulation efforts might be what the Romans end up paying Ethiopian slavers for. Free them and give them a year of free Greek lessons. Not free like the Vlachs but it keeps Ethiopia happy.
Purchasing slaves from Ethiopia is one option, although given shipping constraints I doubt by itself it could do too much. Ten thousand slaves a year seems like a lot, but after a decade that’s still only 100,000, compared to the 16.7 million in the Imperial heartland. I think Rhomania’s going to have more of their own.
Nobles in the countryside: Nobles could go off to country estates, and perhaps even buy one in Vlachia. But much of social prestige in Rhomania is tied to rank and titles. A landowner might be the big fish on his Vlach estate, but he’d be a nobody when he went to Constantinople. Meanwhile his annoying cousin just made Kephale of Corfu and so is a somebody by Roman high society. Plus there’s the perceived cultural backwardness. The cities of Rhomania are where the action and the quality is, in their view.
Because if there's one thing Henri II needs is yet another thing going his way. Although in this case it is more his enemy is a moron rather than anything he did on his own merits. But still, it all counts in the end.
Unfortunately for Henry and the Triunes he is very much like Andreas I where he is building up the Triunes to a point that they can't maintain long term without an excellent ruler. The second they don't they will find out if they have the resilience of Rhomania.
I’m actively looking forward to the Triunes exploding. Because once it does I doubt anyone can put it back together. Everything has seemingly gone there way, where even when they lose, they win. And I know you can say that about Rhomania to a certain extent as well. But with the Triunes it’s like the norm to pull gold out of their butt, not the miracle in desperate moment like Rhomania. I’m looking forward to the equal amount of bad luck they’re due
I hope that the explosion will be glorious where they suffer immensely and won't be able to recover for a very long time. Even if they recover I still hope it will be near impossible to bring back their old glory days.
I picture Henri II like TTL’s version of Bismarck. He may not shadow-puppet everything to turn out the way he wants, but he’s brilliant at recognizing opportunities, seizing them, and exploiting them for all they’re worth. I will say though at some point he will be saying something like “God has granted me everything, save a successor capable of following me”.
I will say though that I’m liking how infuriatingly arrogant and disgustingly lucky (because of said arrogance) people find the Triunes, since they’re based on the OTL British Empire and a lot of Triune attitudes and actions are copies or adaptations from OTL.
One of the biggest plot points in Roman TLs is the 'Crisis-after-Crisis' I feel. While justified in this TL many others just leave you exhausted after a point.
To an extent Rhomania isn't really having that many more crisis than many countries did, look at Russian or Chinese history to see how things can go wrong, they are just in a position that can be very unforgiving to one. That being said this is likely the last major civil war/succession crisis they will be facing in a long time so most threats will be external.
I think the history of every country is filled with crisis after crisis, it’s just that the type and severity can vary. Some crises that are viewed as big when they’re happening, but don’t end up making it into the history books because it turns out they weren’t significant long-term. Every generation of Christians since St Paul has thought they’re living in the end times, because just look at all the crises surrounding them.
That said, the 1630s and early 1640s are definitely very busy years for Rhomania, and afterwards I plan for things to get quieter and more relaxed for them.
There has been consistent slavic population movents to anatolia since it was first depopulated during the persian wars. I wonder how it has impacted the traditions and culture of the region
It seems that the Slavs in Anatolia got absorbed into the preexisting populations, much as most of the Slavs that settled in Greece ended up getting Hellenized after the Byzantine re-conquest. But there were some holdouts; the Slavs of Mount Taygetos remained as a distinctly Slavic group until after the Ottoman conquest IOTL.
It would be interesting to see how the situation in Vlachia will affect Serbia. Both countries are in somewhat similar situations, both suffering from war, not so developed economy and so on.
Serbia’s in a bit better position than Vlachia. It doesn’t have as strong of trade links with Rhomania and isn’t considered a ‘larder of Constantinople’, so the White Palace isn’t as concerned with ensuring Serbian trade flows cheaply. There isn’t the set of ‘mega-landowners who want big agricultural holdings worked by staked-down laborers to feed Roman markets in bulk foodstuffs’. Serbia could go down the Vlach road if it ends up in the same kind of relationship as Vlachia did. Socially, Serbia will be better off if its trade links with Rhomania remain limited.
Roman Arsenal: Moving the arsenal to the mouth of the Golden Horn would be a bad idea. Because then one of two things happen. One, the remainder of the Golden Horn remains open to commercial traffic, a substantial amount of it foreign. That means foreign ships are constantly sailing back and forth in front of the Arsenal, which presents serious security issues. Two, to avoid that issue, the rest of the Golden Horn is closed to commercial traffic. This massively weakens Constantinople as a trade port and also makes provisioning it much more difficult.
Based on the discussion it seems the best place to move it would be somewhere near Nikomedia. The logistics to support the city can be up-scaled to support the shipyard rather than creating something out of whole cloth and if an enemy army can reach that area anyway, the Empire has bigger problems.