If that's the title, then that works. Exarchate sounds pretty cool.Well an exarch could fill this role
If that's the title, then that works. Exarchate sounds pretty cool.Well an exarch could fill this role
such as the laundries and bathhouses which are almost all Zeng owned and operated.
Pyrgos, the ‘slave-snatching’ is typically conducted with proas, native outrigger vessels. These ships stand little chance in battle against a Roman warship, but are so fast that it is extremely difficult for even the fleetest Roman fregata to force an action.
I wonder if Orthidoxy will be able to grow a bit in poland now that it's more in Rhomes sphere now. Obviously there won't be a majority but maybe in major trade centers there could be a sizable Orthidox population.
I can see a more Orthodox Hungary for sure as they are both militarily and economically tied to Rhome/Serbia/Vlachia. I think Poland is a bridge too far. Maybe in the largest cities there's a church or two but that's it - I think Poland is too firmly Catholic and too far away for Orthodoxy to make major inroads.
I'm not so sure of that - consider that it is flanked to the south and the east - Rus is also applying pressure in that regard. Whilst I don't think it'll happen in the current century, but if the future brings a decline for the Empire of the North, especially one that leads to a Rus-dominated Baltic - say controlling the Oresund and the Belts. That would then effectively mean that it'd be North, South and East. Having the Baltic be a Russian Lake would certainly be a seismic shift in N.Europe, but that'd probably be enough.
I think this is pretty much inevitable for the same reason Sweden declined in the 18th Century - just not enough people in Scandinavia when compared to the powerhouses that are Russia, Triune France/England, and a resurrected Germany.
Do they even exists after like 1500 years ?The Bactrian Greeks are mostly Buddhist, right?
I wonder, how many ethnic greeks were in former bactria in the 1600 if at any? Idk what it would mean in the plot of this tl but it would be interesting if the Rhomans exploited it somehow
They died with Kushan. When they changed their administrative language from Greek go Bactrian in the 2nd century that was because Eastern Greek was already on the decline. They did not survive the end of the Kushan state in the late 4th century.Do they even exists after like 1500 years ?
And yep they were Buddhist
Is their Greek legacy still felt to some extent? Like when the Romans would come they would greet them hello folks, we are the grandsons of Alexander's soldiers ?They died with Kushan. When they changed their administrative language from Greek go Bactrian in the 2nd century that was because Eastern Greek was already on the decline. They did not survive the end of the Kushan state in the late 4th century.
Bactrian used Greek letters though, and the following Sassanid period and the period I can never spell (starts with an H I think) saw that language get influenced more by Western Iranian. The the Arabs came and launched their linguistic genocide of the old Iranian languages.
So no, there are no Greeks there. Or at least no one who would self identify as Greek, other than recent arrivals.
Almost certainly some local villages would have some sort of mythic founding story that may or may not be true and for which the local people may or may not give in.Is their Greek legacy still felt to some extent? Like when the Romans would come they would greet them hello folks, we are the grandsons of Alexander's soldiers ?
Almost certainly some local villages would have some sort of mythic founding story that may or may not be true and for which the local people may or may not give in.
Keep in mind though that Alexander The Great is synonymous with a curse in Iranian culture. He is a vilified monster literally depicted as a demon with two horns in Islamic tradition. It is highly unlikely that any of them would have pride in being a part of the conquests when they have had a thousand years of vilification for that particular western conquest and many other more recent ones. That being said local people can be weird sometimes and take strange pride in their own oddities or uniqueness. Humans are like that.
See this for more information:
Theories about Alexander the Great in the Quran - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Huh, maybe I was misremembering that detail. I still think it's unlikely you'd have people claiming Greek descent. It's been far too long, even without an element of hate. Though I suppose it could also die out in the pre-islamic period. Frankly I'm not certain anymore when it could have stopped being a thing but I doubt its lasted until the 1630s.Uhm your own source gives the reverse description, with the two horns indicating him as champion of Allah and Alexander building the wall that keeps at bay Gog and Magog. Even in Iranian texts you have on one hand Pahlavi scripts mostly depicting Alexander as an enemy but then you also have post-Islamic traditions making Alexander a Persian king/rightful owner of the throne.
Probably not, perhaps there is some distant memory, or legend in some villages. Today the Kalash people in modern Pakistan claim that they descend from soldiers in the army of Alexander the Great, although this has not be proved yet. They have however some European characteristics, fair skin and often blue eyes . https://www.ancient-origins.net/his...tan-really-descendants-alexander-great-021731Is their Greek legacy still felt to some extent? Like when the Romans would come they would greet them hello folks, we are the grandsons of Alexander's soldiers ?