American southern ontario and New Brunsick

How likely would it have been for in the revolution for America to take southern Ontario and OTL new Brunswick? Quebec and Nova Scotia is totally ASB but what about these 2 lesser settled areas.
 
IOTL Britain signed the Treaty of Paris recognising American independence while British forces still controlled the cities of New York and Philadelphia. If your rebels had seized those other areas by force, rather than by having a significant proportion of their (white) populations joining the rebellion, then withdrawal from them might well have been a precondition for British withdrawal from the cities.
 
Pushing the line north into New Brunswick is doable and southern Ontario is certainly possible. Benjamin Franklin's initial boundary proposal at the Treaty of Paris talks supposedly had what is today the arrowhead region of Minnesota, northern Wisconsin and Michigan's U.P. remain in British hands and what is today southeastern Ontario go in U.S. hands. A map showing this proposed/possible boundary is posted in the 1st post in this thread from a few years ago: Treaty of Paris WI: A Different US-BNA Boundary.
 
Not in Britain's best interests, though, I think. After all, apart from anything else, south-eastern Ontario was closer to home and easier to get to than those other lands (especially considering how American ownership of south-eastern Ontario would make it harder for the British to continue west), and presumably the Mesabi iron ore deposits weren't yet known about.
 
Last edited:
Did New Brunswick at this time have much of an English-speaking population, or was it still almost entirely Acadian? The Acadians would be in an interesting position. They had fought the New Englanders for years, but then again, the British had just expelled them from Nova Scotia. I'm not sure where their sympathies would have been in the event of an American invasion.
 
Top