America slipped

Some threads on this board, the "America discovered early", and "-late" made me think of a scenario that would see the Americas far more advanced my the middle ages...

What if America was disovered very early, and an attempt to start up trade/colonization was made, but failed? And america slipped out of the known world?

The Phoenicians have been mentioned, because they did things like that, and there was quite a good thread on the Romans, but thats been done. Some other seafaring civilization could have done it as well. The Sea Peoples, the Tartessans was well situated, or the Minoans.

A determined attempt to start a colony, with knowledge of iron, horses, writing, the wheel, shipbuilding, new crops, etc, then abandoned and forgotten would do wonders for precolombian america, I think.

The Minoans, while slightly before the Iron Age, has the advantage of the Thera eruption being quite a handy point to stop supporting a colony, and start looking at their own problems. If they set up a colony on an island in the Caribbean, and used the Caribbean sea and the gulf of mexico as a trading sea like the med.

It seems the Minoans ranged as far afield as Norway. If a ship made it across the atlantic and back, they might send an expedition.

Admittedly, I am not sure what would motivate the effort, since they would not be meeting gold-using civilizations. But sometimes all it takes is a ruler with strong opinion or an auspcious sign by the gods.

A minoan colony in the Caribbean, abandoned about 1600 BC, trading around the mexico-south america-central america would spread out new crops and ideas much more rapidly than the travel up and down the Panama bottleneck.

At the time, iron was known in the mediterranean area, but more valuable than gold due to scarcity. If the massive deposits at the western ends of the great lakes was discovered, look for a lot of trade up and down the mississppi, too.

It doesn't matter if the colony only lasts for a century or two after abandonment by europe. Once their ideas hit the late Olmec, early Maya that was developing at this time, it'd add massively to the knowledge pool of the Americas.

Also, and perhaps more importantly, the establishment of a double-wheel pattern of civilization in precolombian america around the coast would be an enormous accelerator.

Of course, they wont meet the exact same mayas, because there will be a disease shock to the indians which will butterfly a lot of changes in.

But that will also benefit the indians in the long run, becaus a bit more familiarity with old world plagues, and domesicated animals will help later.

Also, if the colony is absorbed rather than wiped out, it will increase the Indians range of MHC-types quite a bit, helping when they encounter new diseases as well.

What do you think?
 
Even if the Vikings set up a colony in Vinland that's destroyed later, so the Indians get cows, pigs, chickens, and maybe even, best of all, horses, that would help the Indians a lot.
 
Where would a medittaranian civilisation be most likely to land? Mesoamerica? That would mean possible contact with the Olmecs.
 
If they go via the Canaries, they'll end up probably in the same place as Columbus. That is, if they are looking for some land in the west (Atlantis?) and thus go straight west. If they're blown to America by a gale, they could land anywhere.
 
I thought Caribbean islands, becuse that would suit the Minoans best as well. After posting, I found out that the Olmecs are considered the precursor civilization of every common trait of mesoamerican civilizations since.

Toss in a colony of the mediterranean, and not only do we double the variety of their civilization seed, but the americas will start out with a greater variety of inventions and crops than europe and the med did.
 
Ocean Currents;
Ocean_currents_1911.jpg


Depending where they leave from they;ll likely follow those currents, or go against them.
 
everything will depend on how long ago the 'slip' happened, and how much they affected the natives in the process. If it was clear back in Minoan times, then the natives will have a chance to develop an advanced culture... if they manage to adopt the wheat, cows, horses, etc. The problem is, it could all so easily not happen. If the Minoans leave behind just a few of any particular animal, it would be so easy for some hostile group of natives to kill them and eat them.... so, no cows or pigs maybe.... horses might be a go, if the natives saw the Minoans riding them, they'd like the idea enough to keep the horses around. Wheat could spread across the temperate zone easily.
 
It depends how long the colonists were there for. They may even trade with the natives to gve them animals and crops.
 
Yes. I was envisioning a trading post growing to a colony before support was lost, and then persisting as an independent entity for 200+ years.

Establishing a practice of ship trading around the gulf and caribbean, maybe up the mississippi. As well as adding a second seed of invention to the Olmecs, and a third centre of civilization to the north and south ones present in OTL.

Wheter they were conquered by other peoples after 200 years, or persisted as a powerful nation for a thousand years isn't essential, as long as the islands (Cuba? Haiti?) stays a somewhat civilized seafaring location under someone.

And even with the thousand-year option, we are still at a point in history where Rome were just barely founded.

There is a lot of leeway for it to be forgotten too...Even discounting the tsunamis composed of fire and stone Thera put over the Minoans, their script is fairly undeciphered.
 
I thought Caribbean islands, becuse that would suit the Minoans best as well. After posting, I found out that the Olmecs are considered the precursor civilization of every common trait of mesoamerican civilizations since.

Toss in a colony of the mediterranean, and not only do we double the variety of their civilization seed, but the americas will start out with a greater variety of inventions and crops than europe and the med did.

Yeah, it's pretty wierd to think that all it would have taken is one colony, and the Americas could have ended up the more advanced hemisphere. The Olmecs may have had the zero (certainly their Maya successors did), and their name means something like "rubber people", so obviously they had rubber as well, and their own package of domesticated plants and animals. Depending on how much of the Mediterranean package is brought over, this gives them a huge advantage over Eurasia, who do not have these things.
 

HueyLong

Banned
Depending on when it happened, some American crops could end up in Europe. That would have an effect on their development, as well.
 
I'm resurrecting this one after thinking about it for a bit. I like the original concept, but there were some problems with it:

-There was no real reason for the Minoans to make the extreme effort to cross the atlantic and set up a colony.

-The Minoans fell around 1450 BC, while I had heard that the Olmecs arose around 1200 BC. A colony established before the Thera eruption would have predated the Olmecs by quite a bit.
The Olmec culture are considered the "mother culture" of all the successive mesoamerican civilizations. Originating every concept common to them.

By introducing an advanced mediterranea civilization well before that, it would be supplanted, rather than supplemented.

However, I have later read that the Olmecs are considered to have had their zenith between 1200 and 900 BC. So they may have been on the rise well before that.

I have afterwards been wondering about a slightly different POD:

Assume that a Minoan trader in the atlantic was blown of course, and briefly made landfall in the Caribbean. Assume futher that due to the briefness of the landfalls and coincidence, they saw no signs of human habitation. They did manage to cross back to the mediterranean, and their logs were known, although considered unimportant.

Later, as the Minoan were falling to the Greeks, such a location suddenly came to seem important. Fleeing the invaders, in their last ships, one group of Minoans crossed to the Caribbean. This would have been around 1420 BC.

With the time it would take to establish themselves, it is quite possible that they would not make contact with the Olmecs untill maybe the 1100s BC.

That would get us what we want: A second civilization seed in the Americas. Transferring a number of items.

-Advanced shipbuilding and a maritime trading tradition.
-New food crops.
-Some old world diseases.
-Metalworking
-Domestication

Also adding the Caribbean islands to the ancient american civilization area, with a rapid spread to technology by ship around the gulf of Mexico.

Another good reason to use the Mioans here, besides their maritime skills and island-centered way of life, would be that their civilization seems to have been more culturally divergent than most others from the american ones, adding to the cultural/religous diversity.
 
Top