Alternative Arabic Expansions

Here's a map of the OTL Ummayads at their greatest extent. Gives you a pretty good idea of where the Arabs expanded into.


And four hypothetical alternatives that I can think of:

1) Down the Nile.
2) Down the African coast.
3) Onto the Eastern European plains.
4) Into India.

Maybe a variation of the hypothetical East African Coast (2) and Indian (4) maps, albeit not as far south along the East African coast and expanding more into roughly the Balochistan region as well as the southern parts of Central Asia then into India proper?
 
Hamito-Semitic_languages.jpg If unable to expand much into south-west asia, and population or some other pressure still encourages large scale expansions, then the arabs will pretty much be forced by geography to expand a bit further into africa.

This map of the modern day distribution of afro-asiatic languages looks like a good approximation of the maximum south-eastern extent they could reach. Any further south and considerably different climate necessitates different crops, livestock, and immune systems.

adjustedummayed.jpg


So how about this?

The north-eastern border could adjust considerably with wars with the romans and persians.

The south-western border is pretty arbitrarily drawn in the desert, I imagine arabs will control most permanent settlements, and nomadic muslim berbers might pledge allegiance to arab empires but be effectively independent.

The southernmost extent is determined by climate. Arabs might settle a bit further down the eastern coast though.

Various islands in the Atlantic, Mediterranean, and Indian might also be settled.
 

PhilippeO

Banned
If Byzantine-Sassanian not exhausted themselves in war, and Arab army failed to defeat them. there are several possibilities that Arabs could spread as citizens/settlers/foederati of both empires.

1) Arabs as Normans. failure of expansion cause new faith to collapse, and Arabs convert to Christianity / Zoroastrian and spread as Roman / Sassanian citizens. they join legion en-masse, ask for re-settlement in border province and spread in many cities inside both empires. Laksmid-Ghazanid land would be like Normandia, dominated by Arabs, but Arabs also spread beyond that. Arabs governor of Danube / Britannia ?

2) Arabs as Jews-Khazars. similar to above, but in this case Arabian Pennisula itself is held by strong Islamic government. the government of Arabia could be source of legislation, cultural pride, and threat against persecution.
 
Here's a map of the OTL Ummayads at their greatest extent. Gives you a pretty good idea of where the Arabs expanded into.


And four hypothetical alternatives that I can think of:

1) Down the Nile.
2) Down the African coast.
3) Onto the Eastern European plains.
4) Into India.
I think that in 3 and 4 you still need Persia for it to be more plausible.
 
I'm a sucker for Islamic Italy but I doubt it happens, so "down the Nile" or "down the east African coast" have my vote.

This is actually the scenario that interests me the most, as well, since it seems fairly realistic and is also one which doesn't get used in many timelines (to my knowledge, at least!). I wonder how this state would develop and what impact a larger, and earlier, Muslim presence would have on Africa.
 

Deleted member 67076

View attachment 287291 If unable to expand much into south-west asia, and population or some other pressure still encourages large scale expansions, then the arabs will pretty much be forced by geography to expand a bit further into africa.

This map of the modern day distribution of afro-asiatic languages looks like a good approximation of the maximum south-eastern extent they could reach. Any further south and considerably different climate necessitates different crops, livestock, and immune systems.

View attachment 287309

So how about this?

The north-eastern border could adjust considerably with wars with the romans and persians.

The south-western border is pretty arbitrarily drawn in the desert, I imagine arabs will control most permanent settlements, and nomadic muslim berbers might pledge allegiance to arab empires but be effectively independent.

The southernmost extent is determined by climate. Arabs might settle a bit further down the eastern coast though.

Various islands in the Atlantic, Mediterranean, and Indian might also be settled.
The problem I see with this map is that the Arabs won't be getting past the Sudd. Extremely difficult, disease ridden, swampy terrain to cross until early modern logistics are formed, and theres no wealth to extract from the region.

Similarly, the Ethiopian highlands are a very tough nut to crack, although probably doable if overwhelming force is used.
 

Deleted member 67076

This is actually the scenario that interests me the most, as well, since it seems fairly realistic and is also one which doesn't get used in many timelines (to my knowledge, at least!). I wonder how this state would develop and what impact a larger, and earlier, Muslim presence would have on Africa.
You'd essentially prevent the collapse (or recreate it after a brief collapse) of the Roman trading network centered around the Mediterranean. Ironically, much of southern Europe would remain very Antiquity-ish in culture (with a large Arab influence of course) and style for far longer and feudalism would be aborted in Italy and Spain.
 
Off handed question: One of the reasons I'm asking this is to help gain information and insight for my current timeline.

Although the Arabic world isn't it's main focus, I am loathe to not chase down butterflies as best I can.

Do, you, by chance, have any good sources I could look at? Currently, I'm relying mainly on Wikipedia and any lectures I can find on pre-Islamic Arabia. I like to think I've pieces together a logical and engaging narrative so far. But, as is the cse with these things, more information always helps.

"Ancient Arabia. A brief history and timeline" by Macdonald is available online and fairly good.
 
Top