Alternate World War 2

Just any realistic way the WR stays alive. It can be in a good/shit state as long as it survives to this day.

In terms of military enough to hold France (a normal France that is) for this will be enough,to preserve territorial integrity.
Politically/Economically start/continue rebuilding relations continue rebuilding this will help avoiding the extremists treats or at least limit them, and is always better to fight an war on other people backyard.

Another option will be for Americans to stay in Europe after WWI to guaranty the integrity of Germany, for Germany after the peace treaty become vulnerable to France, exporting her problems
 
Last edited:
My alt WW2 would be an extension of the winter war, although in this case the NSDAP never arose as in this TL Hitler was seen as a rather irrational fool by a far greater proportion of the German nation than OTL. So we have a fairly conservative government in Germany, plus very conservative groups in UK and France, all of these WERE keen on intervening on Finlands side. Indeed the brigades dispatched to Norway in 1940 were originally intended for use in Finland. So now we can maybe see Spitfires providing some top cover for JU87s while Chasseurs d'Alpins fight off some poor Soviets. Oh as an extension lets also have a renewal of the Anglo Japanese Naval Treaty, that should make things interesting in the Pacific to put it mildly...
 
The will be involved,how would they be is another question,and that depends how the allies and UK in special how cope with the war.And then there are two forms of involvement direct (sending troops) and indirect (material support),second one i think is definitely.
And in the case of Australia there is the possibility of direct involvement by some one attacking them.
 

Dirk_Pitt

Banned
Stalin, assuming that he's in power in the USSR, was a very oportunistic bastard... Odds on he would wait for the oportunity to strike against the west, this could take decades. Even if he were to die, I see very little reason for successors to moderate without a WWII to speed development of nukes there would be no cold war and no need to keep the west from going ape shit over them. There'd be no real reason for the west to suspect anything. They had a very low opinion of the Soviet military, they only gave the Soviets 6 weeks against the Nazis OTL, and there wouldn't have been a WWII to prove them wrong. I'd date this WWII at around '50s or '60s when the Soviets would be ready. Or when the west is distracted. Maybe a war between the US and Britain? Not so far fetched when you realized that relations between the two weren't very good prior to WWII OTL. Without WWII to moderate relations between the two nations I can see a war at some point in the future. With that war the west might be weakened enough for the Soviets to strike.


You don't need to have a WWII take place during the 1940s.
 
Top