Alternate Wikipedia Infoboxes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Arch, these are very interesting. I assume I haven't missed the original POD marker and you're simply doing these as a broad-brush piece of creativity without any specific departure.

How exactly does the grand coalition in Virginia work? Seems to me it would be somewhat difficult to manage in a system in which the executive, in the shape of the governor, is directly elected.
 
Arch, these are very interesting. I assume I haven't missed the original POD marker and you're simply doing these as a broad-brush piece of creativity without any specific departure.

Yeah, there's really no specific PoD. Basically just a smaller, less powerful United States confined to the east of the Mississippi and going from there.

How exactly does the grand coalition in Virginia work? Seems to me it would be somewhat difficult to manage in a system in which the executive, in the shape of the governor, is directly elected.

The governor isn't directly or popularly elected, and is instead elected by the legislature for a one year term. Policy is generally dictated by a joint coalition board comprised of the leaders of both parties, legislators, local leaders and political bigwigs. The landowners want to do their own thing with cheap black labor and the miners want good pay and safe working conditions while keeping the cheap black labor out (the ULP tends towards some form of libertarian socialism to go alongside The Republicans' more general agrarian libertarianism). They generally don't run candidates against each other at the local, state and federal levels, and they control around 70 seats in the House of Delegates (out of ~100). That said, there's some growing discontent amongst the left wing of the ULP (who are more anarcho-syndicalist) with the coalition.
 
Jefferson's America
The South Carolina gubernatorial election of 1998 was the first open and free gubernatorial election in the history of the state. It was the first post-segregation election and was the first to be held under the Third Constitution of 1996. Incumbent governor Dale Hammond was ineligible to run fro a second term. He had dissolved the ruling South Carolina Party several years earlier, realigning the electoral landscape of South Carolina. Many moderate and liberal whites joined with the former New Republican Forum and the Liberal Social Party to form the Liberal Republican Party, a social liberal party that gained support from small numbers of blacks. However, many whites who were upset with their loss of power joined with more radical members of the former SCP into the White People's Party, a far-right white nationalist political party. Most blacks joined the People's Civic Party, a corporatist, neo-civicist political party. The LRP nominated former SCP Governor Derrick Noble for governor--the LRP tried to gain the endorsement of Governor Hammond, who remained neutral during the election. The WPP chose former State Attorney-General Adam Hopkins, while the PCP selected civil rights activist Donnell Perry. With vast support from South Carolina's black population (which comprised more than two-thirds of the state's population), Perry easily won election.

GeCVZnB.png
 
Ah, of course, considering the setting offices still being by appointment in some states would make perfect sense. Once again in an alternate scenario I'm inferring too much based on OTL.

It's interesting how fragmented the party landscape is so far, though admittedly we've only seen a small snapshot. I'm assuming by what we've seen so far that the South has exerted a dominant or at least equal influence over this US, and that some of the northern states might have outright split off considering what we've seen so far.

I guess the party fragmentation isn't too surprising if politics is very much decentralised to the states.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 82118

History of South Carolina in TTL looks like OTL South African history, with Perry as Mandela analoge. Or not?
And, I really want to see history of other US states in TTL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, of course, considering the setting offices still being by appointment in some states would make perfect sense. Once again in an alternate scenario I'm inferring too much based on OTL.

I'm also using this as an opportunity to explore different sorts of executive and governance systems, like collegial or elected leadership councils, appointed, elected, different terms, etc.

It's interesting how fragmented the party landscape is so far, though admittedly we've only seen a small snapshot. I'm assuming by what we've seen so far that the South has exerted a dominant or at least equal influence over this US, and that some of the northern states might have outright split off considering what we've seen so far.

I guess the party fragmentation isn't too surprising if politics is very much decentralised to the states.

Yeah, politics in this United States are very fragmented and done on a state-by-state basis with broad, loose alliances at the federal level.

History of South Carolina in TTL looks like OTL South African history, with Perry as Mandela analoge. Or not?

Generally, but not really. Perry is no Mandela.

And, I really want to see history of other US states in TTL

Those are coming up next.

Looks cool. What happens to New York politics? I'm sure that would be terribly interesting. :)

New York politics you say?

dwHcmhk.gif
 
1926 and 1928 elections

After becoming the first Vice-President to ascend to the Presidency and be elected to the office, Hunt managed to push through a rather impressive legislative package. Banking reform, a national pension problem, a new insurance program for a majority of Americans, and some liberalization of alcohol laws (to the rage and offense to the Prohibitionists). Congress changed very little due to the support of the Hunt Administration.

attachment.php


However as time went on the economy slowed, from late 1926 to early 1928 the economy made at best incremental improvements or more often a lethargic slide downwards. By 1928 the country was chafing for change, the rural areas where the Populists reigned supreme wouldn't complain much, but the cities and non-populist strongholds in the Midwest were getting antsy about how much longer the economy would go down, or if it would fall out into a depression. Despite early in office Hunt claimed he'd only served 1 term (the part of La Follette's being somewhat of an interim Presidency), he switched gears in late 1927 and announced he wouldn't run for a 3rd term, owing to Washington's example. The real reason was his unpopularity, and fear of losing by an embarrassing margin.

Hunt annointed former Governor of California, and fellow westerner, John Arthur Elston. Hunt primarily backed him due to his support for the Central Arizona Project back in the late 1910's, and felt his cool and calm personality would be a good contrast to Hunt and provide American's a reliable figure to look up to. Speaker La Guardia had to browbeat the delegates to accept a Socialist, former AFL President and now a Representative from Ohio, William Green. Many Socialists wanted to field a candidate now, feeling Hunt to be weak and now their chance to shine, but Congressional and Union bosses nixed that idea, promising La Guardia they won't run someone against the Populists if they put up one of their own. So the light shone on the mild and likable Green. The Republican's ran the opposite course, choosing James Eli Watson, the famous Indianan who beat Eugene Debs for Governor in 1920. James Alexander Reed of Missouri was chosen by the delegates primarily to attract white Southerner's and some Populists (Reed being a Populist before defecting in 1905 as state senator).

attachment.php


The election was a rallying success for the Republicans. Despite the facade of calmness and integrity Elston put up, rumors of a suicide attempt a decade ago rocketed to the surface and his refusal to talk about it worried a lot of people. Green was put on the spot by newspapers asking what they thought of the rumors, and whether he planned take over like Hunt, to which he categorically denied. The Republicans ran with it, attacking Elston as mentally insane, that he'd attack Japan and would stop trade with China (the anti-Asian rumors ironically sprung up as a result of the Republican California Attorney General Ulysses Webb enforcing some Socialist backed Alien Land Bills). Green was meant to draw in Socialists, but many voted for the Republicans out of fear of a electing a suicidal President. Even without the rumors of Elston's mental state, the Populists likely would have lost, albeit by not as much.

attachment.php


Populists were hit rather hard, and Socialists ironically held strong, many of their voters going for a split ticket. The Republicans made good gains but by not enough to take the House on their own, they'd still need the Prohibitionists. The Prohibitionists had been under the hand of Babson for nearly a decade now, he had kept his hand in the business world and in politics rather steadily. His power as House Minority Leader often meant he could bring down any Republican bills if he so desired, keeping patronage and chairmanships in his hands. But a decade of that, coupled with some strange political beliefs he spouted, made junior party members anxious to get rid of him, and Republicans happy to oust the overbearing and autocratic leader. When the new Congress rolled around his party voted him out as leader, and in his place put Sidney Johnston Catts of Florida in his position. Despite being a plan cooked up by the Prohibitionists, the plan primarily help the Republicans, Catts being a vicious racist and even more temperamental and judgmental then Babson, driving most of the Representatives to leave and become Independents. They opposed everything but the most right-wing bills and generally made themselves a nuisance to the Republicans who they regretted plotting with.

Things weren't looking good for anyone at this point, Populists sore from the economy, Socialists for La Follette (albeit that was mostly forgotten by 1930 but some still holding on to it), Prohibitionists for their embarrassing self-defeat, and Republicans for causing a political meltdown in their junior partner, thus leading to a Congress mostly against them on various political sides.

1890 Lodge Bill Timeline:
1892 Presidential and Congressional elections
1894 Congress/1896 general elections
1898 Congress/1900 general election
1902 Congress/1904 general elections
*John Calhoun Bell biography
1906 Congressional elections
1908 General Elections
1910 Congress/1912 general election
1914 House elections
1916 General Elections
1918 House elections
1920 Presidential Election
1920 House and Senate elections
1922 House elections
1924 General Elections
 
Very nice stuff in the last few pages; the political mess-ups of Mike's and Nofix's TLs are very fun to watch. LaGuardia is rarely seen on the national stage: I wonder how high his ambitions will go...


And my offering, a viginette from the TL I keep trying to write. An alternate WWI goes better for the Allies and as a result the USSR emerges as a much weaker force and the Nazis never rise into relevance. Hence these.

Kissassenger_zpsb4fcbf81.jpg~original
Albright_zps2dc224b0.png~original
 
And my offering, a viginette from the TL I keep trying to write. An alternate WWI goes better for the Allies and as a result the USSR emerges as a much weaker force and the Nazis never rise into relevance. Hence these.

WWI goes better for the Allies? The thing that would prevent the Nazis showing up would be if the victory was smaller.
 
WWI goes better for the Allies? The thing that would prevent the Nazis showing up would be if the victory was smaller.

Actually, a much larger Allied victory in WWI could have prevented the whole Stabbed in the Back myth that helped fuel the rise of Nazism and the far-right.
 
Actually, a much larger Allied victory in WWI could have prevented the whole Stabbed in the Back myth that helped fuel the rise of Nazism and the far-right.

That's certainly true, but the increase in revanchism is still going to make up for that. The Germany we see probably wouldn't be Nazi, but I could very well see some sort of conservative dictatorship.
 
True North is back! 1991 is here, and it brings with it chaos, as the new Bloc sweeps Quebec and people wonder if Canadian politics will ever be simple again.

1991_CA_Election_Dukakis.PNG
 
Last edited:
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top