Maybe the Constitution was amended to allow recall elections?I like it, but I'd also like to hear what kind of circumstances can lead to a constitutionally extraordinary 2002 American election
Maybe the Constitution was amended to allow recall elections?I like it, but I'd also like to hear what kind of circumstances can lead to a constitutionally extraordinary 2002 American election
The wording may not be the best phrased but um.. nothing about religion? Just just one of the things I noticed from the box is the 'Atheist Act' passed by Barry Goldwater. There was plenty about religion in the box.Huh?
How in the Name of the Great Bear in the Sky did you think that: "under the yoke of groups like Jehovah's Witnesses or even worse religious sects" when there is NOTHING in the member's post you are replying to about religion, even in passing, for any of politicians listed nor are ANY of the ones listed for the entire 20th or 21st Century members of the Jehovah Witnesses (thanks, BTW, for making me look up the religion of a pack of never were political leaders just for shits and giggles on your part) was going to pass muster?
I'm half tempted to Ban you, this is, after all, going to be your 15th action. However...
Kicked for a week. Know, for a fact, that this is your LAST CHANCE.
Perhaps, but @Hubert Humphrey Fan 1968 himself just said that it's because September 7 2002 is his birthday and no other reason. I don't expect him to come up with a constitutional amendment just for the sake of justifying something he did just for funMaybe the Constitution was amended to allow recall elections?
Oh sing me a song of a lass that is gone...View attachment 476161
Wait what
Say could that lass be I?Oh sing me a song of a lass that is gone...
I think you'll be fine, I've used modern politicians in entirely fictionalized scenarios before and I didn't run into any issues. I'm not the arbiter of this though, so who knows(I realize that I'm kind of toeing the line on "current politics" by including real-world politicians, but I have tried to stick to ones who are obscure [or at least with little international profile; some don't even have English Wikipedia pages], retired, or in a formally non-partisan office… figures who I cannot imagine igniting heated political discussion. Nor are they intended as the main focus here, but as flavour in a larger scenario. Essentially, I think there is a lot more to discuss than just the people within, and— I hope— it's all those other things that pique the most interest and curiosity.)
Who's king of Belgium ITTL?
I'm sure glad I don't live in UtahView attachment 476439
lgbt rights by country in the yankee dominion