*New Jersey just chuckles*
*Ireland is passed out on the ground outside the Dail*
*New Jersey just chuckles*
[EVERY SINGLE FRENCH POLITICIAN JUST LAUGHS]
The U.S. Constitution requires the Vice President to be at least 35 years old. Ted Cruz was born in 1970 and would be 30 on Inauguration Day in 2001. Therefore, he would not be eligible for the vice presidency.
The Wewelsburg Incident was a catastrophic disaster which took place on December 2nd, 1944, in the district of Paderborn, in Nazi Germany. The Incident resulted in the deaths of numerous high-ranking Nazi officials, including Heinrich Himmler and Bernhard Frank, along with potentially several thousand others in a thirty-kilometer radius around the site of the Incident. The cause of the Incident is unknown, and after the end of World War II, all records related to it were deemed to be highly classified by Allied authorities. They remain held under that status to this day.
What if Regan had became President in 68 instead of Nixon?
I started one, but it's meant for wikiboxes about other people's pre-existing timelines.I’d like to inquire as to if this is a request thread as well, if not then is there a thread that specializes in Wikibox requests?
Why (in terms of tactical utility) and how (in terms of negating all this) are fighters a thing here?Spoiler: CAPITAL SHIP ORDER OF BATTLE
Monitors are small, slow, unarmored ships with a lot of big guns, IRL. Is that the meaning here?Spoiler: MONITOR SQUADRON ORDER OF BATTLE
I think fighters have a utility in space combat, for a couple of different reasons.Alright, I'll bite.
Why (in terms of tactical utility) and how (in terms of negating all this) are fighters a thing here?
Unrelated: What's the general procedure of space combat?
Monitors are small, fast, maneuverable (all relative terms in this context) lightly armored ships, with a big gun, that always operate at minimum in groups of four.Monitors are small, slow, unarmored ships with a lot of big guns, IRL. Is that the meaning here?
What if Regan had became President in 68 instead of Nixon?
What does a missile entail here?A missile is a missile no matter what platform it comes from.
Cannon PD instead of lasers?Maybe your battle group has 15 ships; that's fifteen points cannon missile fire can originate from. A
No means of area-denial or large radius weaponry to swat multiple at once?They're also, obviously, lower-priority targets
Bayonets are a bad comparison. Fighters are far more complex and expensive.4)Related to the above, in any military situation, it's just generally useful to have as many options available as possible. It's why they still train jarheads like me to use bayonets, and issue them sometimes. Ideally I'd want to shoot an enemy, and shoot them from as far away as possible, but if I can't do that for whatever reason, it's sure nice to have the bayonet.
Roughly like gunboats, or torpedo boats?Monitors are small, fast, maneuverable (all relative terms in this context) lightly armored ships, with a big gun, that always operate at minimum in groups of four.
Well of course.Addendum: Exist as a platform for me to give things cool names.
Bog-standard sci-fi missile; a guided, self-propelled munition with a warhead.What does a missile entail here?
Point-defense is done by cannons, though what I was referring to in that sentence was the main armament of a warship. On a meta-note, I like kinetics better for aesthetic purposes, in additional to what I feel are practical notions.Cannon PD instead of lasers?
Not at the scale of most fight or the distances doctrine dictates. Situationally or if something has gone wrong/a mistake has been made, a large enough explosion could take out more than one target.No means of area-denial or large radius weaponry to swat multiple at once?
I think I disagree. You're right of course that a fighter is more complex and expensive than a bayonet, but compared to a capital ship, they're cheaper and less complex, like a bayonet is cheaper and less complex than a rifle. Additionally, the point of the comparison was more that it's a good thing to have multiple methods of engaging an enemy.Bayonets are a bad comparison. Fighters are far more complex and expensive.
Any explanation of "how" would fall short because I have a weak science background, and most of what of the research I have done goes right over my head. The setting vacillates between hard and soft sci-fi dependent on what I like and what is convenient for me as the storyteller, with the proviso that I try to have it follow a consistent internal logic; I'd describe the setting as having a "firm" shell that contains a soft, creamy filling with little crunchy bits here and there. I realize that's weak, but that's what I've got (this is where the old-style embarrassed emoji would go, because it gets across the emotion I'm trying to convey much better than any of the new ones, but alas).Also, these are good explanations as to why, but not to how.
Are these drones, or otherwise piloted by something that doesn't incur ludicrous amounts of penalty mass and hard-cap acceleration?
Kinda. Here's something I just posted in the other thread that I hope explains it better.Roughly like gunboats, or torpedo boats?
First off: awesome. Love all the detail.big ol bunch o cool
Well the glaring question is what killed Clinton?
Did the 2007/8 recession occur? Who did McCain face off against in 08?
Thanks, Angry_scottsman! I appreciate the kind words.First off: awesome. Love all the detail.
Couple of questions though: just how big is the alliance military? And for that matter, how did they justify having such a big military? From what I've gleaned the rebels only really had a fleet when they stole a whole bunch and the ak wernt really on the scene when I imagine the buildup begun. So how was it sold to the public?