I'd imagine he'd be a pretty popular Progressive Conservative leader in the late-1950s to early 1970s, and possibly a member of Joe Clark's cabinet after standing as a star candidate in 1979.
If only Canada had Mark Hatfield as Prime Minister.
I'd imagine he'd be a pretty popular Progressive Conservative leader in the late-1950s to early 1970s, and possibly a member of Joe Clark's cabinet after standing as a star candidate in 1979.
Interesting but where have these Earldoms of Oxford and Winchester come from?Emma of Normandy arranges an earlier marriage of her niece, Alice of Normandy to Emma's son Edward. Edward would later go on to become King of England, after the death of his half-brother, Harthacnut, serving until his death in 1066, where he was succeeded by his son, Edward, who became Edward IV, to differentiate the two.
Edward wanted to give his sons titles, so the princes would not be below other lords of the land, such as their uncle, Godwin Earl of Wessex.Interesting but where have these Earldoms of Oxford and Winchester come from?
And the Witan let him? This is not Norman England. Edward needs the Witan's consent to redistribute unconfiscated land, and can't confiscate on a whim.Edward wanted to give his sons titles, so the princes would not be below other lords of the land, such as their uncle, Godwin Earl of Wessex.
His second eldest son was knighted as Earl of Oxford, for Oxford had became an important military frontier town between the kingdoms of Mercia and Wessex, and King Edward wanted to honour the town by awarding it a Prince.
Where as the last son, was honoured with Winchester, which had been a pioneering town for king Alfred the Great, who order the street plan to been redrawn, to provide better defence against the Vikings, as well as being the site for the Cathedral of Winchester that had contained the grave of numerous Saxon Kings as well as being the site for coronations.
He requested that his sons be given the titles, with the price that the princes didn't have total control of the land, but were there as figure heads to rally moral and that the monarchy would help maintain upkeep in the areas.And the Witan let him? This is not Norman England. Edward needs the Witan's consent to redistribute unconfiscated land, and can't confiscate on a whim.
You're still projecting too much Norman style rule onto it. The Old English Earldoms aren't divided willynilly like their shire and borough components. They are more akin to continental Dukes or Scandinavian Jarls than counts.He requested that his sons be given the titles, with the price that the princes didn't have total control of the land, but were there as figure heads to rally moral and that the monarchy would help maintain upkeep in the areas.
There were also marriages of the princes to the daughters important noblemen within the Witenaġemot, while also marriages arranged strongly within the Witan
Oh ok my bad, I do find the transition to Norman from Anglo-Saxon a little confusing, i though it was justified. What would you suggest for the two princes? Would Edward give them new lands? Or leave them as simple princes forcing them to marry for land?You're still projecting too much Norman style rule onto it. The Old English Earldoms aren't divided willynilly like their shire and borough components. They are more akin to continental Dukes or Scandinavian Jarls than counts.
They'll definitely be made thanes and probably sheriffs. If any of the larger Earls falls then you could get away with dividing their lands. But a lot depends on the keeping the Godwines disunited.Oh ok my bad, I do find the transition to Norman from Anglo-Saxon a little confusing, i though it was justified. What would you suggest for the two princes? Would Edward give them new lands? Or leave them as simple princes forcing them to marry for land?
Any context or no context at all?cough
cough
Why, no, I didn't drop that. That must be yours, sir.
cough
cough
Why, no, I didn't drop that. That must be yours, sir.
This is the greatest thing I have ever seen.cough
cough
Why, no, I didn't drop that. That must be yours, sir.
Many people did. The number of voided votes were incredibly concerning, owing thanks to the failure of electronic systems after failed fixes to the potential Y2K crisis. A number of people thought that the invalid votes would turn the tide and when the recount was ended, thanks to the court ruling on NFL v. the United States, the Baseball Riots of 2000 occurred.I demand a recount.
This is truly the darkest timeline.cough
cough
Why, no, I didn't drop that. That must be yours, sir.
cough
cough
Why, no, I didn't drop that. That must be yours, sir.
My god... This looks like smoething straight out of the Bizzaroverse.cough
cough
Why, no, I didn't drop that. That must be yours, sir.