Erm - look at the years again...
Oh, I guess I misread it. Oops.
Erm - look at the years again...
https://www.alternatehistory.com/fo...a-infoboxes-iii.384720/page-277#post-13095731My favourite one I've seen recently is Hillary Rodham Hussein. It was in this thread, though I'm too lazy to look for it.
You lie! She just deleted the old wikibox with help from Lieutenant Governor Abedin!Erm - look at the years again...
You lie! She just deleted the old wikibox with help from Lieutenant Governor Abedin!
Happens to me all time!I know - we all make mistakes. Like running a weak private email server from our bathrooms and being called 'careless' by the head of the FBI.![]()
AH.Com Cliche #23423:
Hillary Rodham Clinton ends up marrying a different influential politician and has a different last name.
View attachment 288751
The Hibou Bleu cafe had long been a popular gathering spot for Canadian Activists of all stripes, indeed the MPF had been planning a raid in October out of suspicion that the AUNF was organizing attacks from it. The Montreal Defense Front, a city wide group nominally against all extremism but in practice affiliated with the CLCU, had no such qualms about planning. The two bombs went off and ripped through the cafe, killing over 30 people and injuring almost 200. Canadian Nationalist Groups responded with the All Hallows Bombing Campaign that returned Les Luttes to Montreal following a two year lull. Relative Moderates in the CLCU who were disgusted by the main organization's refusal to condemn the attack led to the formation of the Citizen's Party of Canada, leading the ultimately fruitless peace talks in Burlington.
The Hibou Bleu bombing remain the second deadliest attack in Montreal.
Les Luttes
Armée d'urgence de la Nouvelle-France (AUNF)
4th Dimensional Terrorists.I thought the "time bombs" were some sort of bomb that sent everything in the radius back in time, or altered the space-time continuum, or something like that for a second, till I realized it was simply a bomb with a timer.
I would love to see a timeline based around this idea.I like Hillary Rodham Weld because it's probably the most realistic. Apparently, Hillary's friend's thought Weld would be a better choice than Bill, who was just 'using Hillary's DC apartment'.
Maybe Hart wins in 1988, and Weld runs as an anti-Washington outsider in 1992.I would love to see a timeline based around this idea.
Yah I saw that too late. I hit to many 0s. Supposed to be 38 million380M casualties on Entente side?!![]()
it's especially shocking given that the combined otl population of those countries in 1907 (not including colonies) is ~255 million.
EDIT: including colonies it's ~290 million.
Being close at one point in one poll does not a plausible victory make. Secondly, moderates are going to be more attuned to Dewhurst than they were to Abbott, so that's gain.
Third, Davis can be as moderate as she wants on whatever issue, but voters and activists know her the most primarily for one.
As for Louisiana, the comparison is ridiculous, because not only did Bill Clinton win the state twice, but control of the state house and governorship have alternated more frequently more recently in Louisiana than in Texas.
Further, if you're agreeing that the scenario is not realistic, then your rebuttal is essentially semantics.
It's common sense. Parties in the U.S. often put forward candidates with appeal beyond the base for exactly this reason.Do you have any proof that conservative candidates do worse than establishment ones at elections?
True, but the bill, as I recall, dealt with both.There's a difference between opposing heavy restrictions on clinics and favoring late term abortions. If you can spot it, I'll give you a cookie.
No, but by admitting that LOuisiana has a stronger Democratic lean, you're proving my point. Remember, Perot garnered considerable support in both of his runs in Texas, and Landrieu lost reelection in Louisiana due to Katrina. The last Democrat reelected governor of Texas was Dolph Briscoe in the seventies.While the Clinton example is sort of frivolous, I'll bite. While Clinton won Louisiana, he also came in a 3 point margin in Texas in 1992, and a 5 point margin in 1996. John Bel Edwards won his election by a greater margin than both. Also, the last Democratic Louisiana Governor was a one-termer in 2004. Does that also make Charlie Baker ASB because Mass Reps haven't taken the state house in decades?
The two aren't equal, but with no explanation as to how an unlikely sequence of events occurred, one can easily conclude ASB.There's a line between something being unrealistic and something being ASB. The two are not equal. I'm not sure what point you're trying to prove, but using the two interchangeably doesn't move this discussion anywhere.