Alternate warships of nations

With that proposal, did they intend for planes to land on that narrow deck? Take off could work well enough.
Yes, they did inytend to land planes on, eralier trials with kites had suggested issues with trying to land on in the face of funnel exhaust and superstructure eddies but they dont seem to have been listened to
.
 
Last edited:
Question about three turrets forward layouts.

So there is the Atlanta/Dido triple superfiring ones, that's obviously the best for forward firepower, but is probably the worst ones as far as stability is considered (unless you go for destroyer scale armament as in the examples).

The cBa ones, like in Nelsons and a bunch of Japanese heavy cruisers.

And the Cba ones, like the Mogamis.

What are the pros and cons between the latter two? I think the Mogami layout gives better firing arcs.
 
Last edited:
Question about three turrets forward layouts.

So there is the Atlanta/Dido triple superfiring ones, that's obviously the best for forward firepower, but is probably the worst ones as far as stability is considered (unless you go for destroyer scale armament as in the examples).
As you say it's the ideal layout all around but has severe limitations when it comes to topweight.
The cBa ones, like in Nelsons and a bunch of Japanese heavy cruisers.
That layout shortens the citadel a bit, but also gives the superfiring gun superior rearward arcs versus having the aft turret superfiring as it is farther away from the bridge superstructure and so can turn back farther. Though your aftermost gun has quite limited arcs.
And the Cba ones, like the Mogamis.
It's probably the best all around IMHO as it still gives you all guns forward at most angles and all your turrets have useful arcs of fire, though your after arcs aren't great with the aft gun and has a longer citadel as a result of the added length to accommodate the center turret.
What are the pros and cons between the latter two? I think the Mogami layout gives better firing arcs.
Hope that helps
 

perfectgeneral

Donor
Monthly Donor
Which begs the question what about abc with no superfiring?

Requires a longer ship as the barrels can't overlap turrets.
Lower top weight without a rased turret as less metal needed and third turret is lower on deck.
Firing arc reduction and gain seems a wash (better at long range, worse at short range)
 
Last edited:
To make that viable length wise you'd probably have to go to the sort of off centreline layouts using wing turrets that you saw on the first generation of dreadnoughts.
 
Given that Agincourt managed 7 centre-line turrets and both the Russians and Italians produced dreadnoughts with 4 non-superposed triples, I think abc would have been possible if anyone had wanted it. But by this point the citadel is probably longer than in a conventional aBy and the firing arcs are significantly worse except (maybe) for directly ahead at long range, so it's hard to see why anyone would.
 
the Midway class had several design proposals (CV-A through I). My Google Fu has failed me and I can't find the designs. USS Midway is proposal CV-E not to be confused with an escort carrier. But I'm still wondering what if the US had gone with a different proposal.
 
Last edited:
the Midway class had several design proposals CVA-I. My Google Fu has failed me and I can't find the designs. USS Midway is proposal CVE not to be confused with an escort carrier. But I'm still wondering what if the US had gone with a different proposal.
Hello,

 
Hello,

thank you, I can't find schemes f through I. can you point me to them?
 
thank you, I can't find schemes f through I. can you point me to them?
Hello,

Despite my best efforts, I cannot locate any further references for the USS Midway preliminary designs beyond E. If your local library carries it, I recommend...
Are you certain there were other design studies beyond E?
 
Anyone have any decent alternatives to Navypedia since it is shut down in the US?
Hello,


(site has not been updated since 2003, but has useful historical information)
Also, these sites have links, so they could provide more information
 
The Thunder Child.jpg
 
Top