Argentina, Chile, & Uruguay, South Africa, Australia, and NZ. Those are the limits of possibility due to climate & disease.
I figured as much. A settler colony in South America would be quite interesting, but I'm not sure they'd be able to establish themselves in what is Argentina and Uruguay too easily -- it wasn't too important resource wise to the Spanish, but I've been told it was an important route to ship the gold from Potosi to Europe.
English Hawaii. That enough is plausible enough to almost have happened.
Would be way down the line if it happened. I'm looking for regions they'd attempt to colonize in the late 16th century (basically from the 1550s onward) and 17th century. Hawaii wasn't even discovered until the 1770s IIRC.
Well, in a TL where the Dutch don't try to compete with the Portuguese in Asia (maybe if their rebellion is defeated by the Spanish) maybe the English could take their role and expand their trade (and conquest) in the East.
Yes. While it wouldn't be any settler colonies, if the English become more interested in the orient, such as Indonesia, they'd settle South Africa to protect those routes as the Dutch did.
You are basicly correct and this is why I think Anglo-wanks are pretty boring. The English/British controlled all of those areas with the only exception of Southern America.
If we don't just use settlement colonies everything is possible. In wars against Spain/Portugal, the Netherlands and France England could get all the useful colonies, like Guyana, various Caribean islands, Brazil and Indonesia (and with an early enough POD get them before those countries). The rest of the worls is a lot less useful. BTW Britain can't get all of those at the same time and keep everything it got OTL. It will overstretch and lose various parts to other countries.
Yes, there's not a whole lot of regions where they can settle, but you still give me ideas. The English displacing the Dutch in Indonesia sounds pretty interesting.