>PVVI'd agree - the CDA are hardly comparable to the religious right in the US, while the PVV are quite socially liberal.
> socially liberal
lol what
do you mean economically?
>PVVI'd agree - the CDA are hardly comparable to the religious right in the US, while the PVV are quite socially liberal.
>PVV
> socially liberal
lol what
do you mean economically?
Not to be off topic... but in the Dutch context, immigration and integration are very much social issues.No. The Dutch 'far right' tend to be rather liberal on social issues - for example look at the LPF, hardly a conservative party on social issues by any measure. I don't equate immigration BTW as a social issue.
Sign me up!People's: Pat Buchanan foreign policy, Jim Webb domestic policy
People's: Pat Buchanan foreign policy, Jim Webb domestic policy
Pat Buchanan in the sense that it's anti-interventionist.So does this mean that we get time to speak and we get to defeat chain-smoking communist dwarves like Deng Xiaoping?
snip
...he is relatively anti-interventionist, isn't he? I mean, he was against the Iraq Wars. He supported the Vietnam War, but as I understand it that was out of anti-communism, which isn't much of a going concern in 2116.
Great, just making sure.He is yes. I mean just look at this cover of his magazine:
When dukakis actually did better in the rust belt than hi(L)lary
1988 but with a more noticeable East/West divide for whatever reason
Bush/Quayle - 353 EV
Dukakis/Bentsen - 185 EV
The Loud Death of the Sixth Party System: The 2024 Presidential Election
ripWhen dukakis actually did better in the rust belt than hi(L)lary
I'm a Republican and I'd vote for Archie Bunker over Ted Cruz (definitely).I'm Republican and I'd vote for Webb over Cruz (maybe).
This looks like 1964 but with more black voters.Here's another map I made. Guess the state by state results:View attachment 312948