Can someone tell me what defines current politics on this site? Apparently an ASB 2036 prediction got included as current politics.
It's the shift between 2012 and 2016, actually, with third parties included.It looks overwhelmingly like 2016 with Bernie in Vermont, McMullin in Utah and SO. Idaho, a strong Libertarian presence in the West with an emphasis on New Mexico, and the Greens in Hawaii
So, in 2019, in the US, it would be the election cycles between 2016-2020, as well as a box that uses current political figures in a way that could lead to current political discussion. So, I'd also recommend keeping a lot of 2024 stuff in current politics, especially if they include people like AOC but that's just me. I'm not quite sure what 2036 map you're referencing.Can someone tell me what defines current politics on this site? Apparently an ASB 2036 prediction got included as current politics.
Hey, I was close enoughIt's the shift between 2012 and 2016, actually, with third parties included.
It didn't though, the one that was called out was a 2020 prediction.Can someone tell me what defines current politics on this site? Apparently an ASB 2036 prediction got included as current politics.
Anything involving the next or previous election cycle (so for the US that would be 2020 and 2016) or current/recent political figures (so just about all maps involving Trump, most maps involving Hillary Clinton, etc.)Can someone tell me what defines current politics on this site? Apparently an ASB 2036 prediction got included as current politics.
Anything involving the next or previous election cycle (so for the US that would be 2020 and 2016) or current/recent political figures (so just about all maps involving Trump, most maps involving Hillary Clinton, etc.)
I doubt it since it would prompt someone to discuss current politics.I dont want to drag this out longer than needed, but I just want to know, since you mentioned Trump, would it be fine to have maps of him running back in the past or something? Like for example, Trump instead of Perot in 1992
What if McGovern won the Nomination in 1968?
Richard M. Nixon (R-NY)/Spiro Agnew (R-MD) - 298 EV, 41% PV
George McGovern (D-SD)/Ted Kennedy (D-MA) - 187 EV, 40% PV
George Wallace (AI-AL)/Curtis LeMay (AI-CA) - 53 EV, 18% PV
I’m assuming that McGovern’s liberalism drives many voters to Wallace in the South and elsewhere...I think most people would freak if Wallace got basically half of the vote of either one of the major nominations. That's basically as good as Perot
I don’t think so. There might be some exceptions, but for the most part it’s just best to avoid him entirely (or just play it safe and post them in the current politics thread).I dont want to drag this out longer than needed, but I just want to know, since you mentioned Trump, would it be fine to have maps of him running back in the past or something? Like for example, Trump instead of Perot in 1992
I don't like how you split up Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse, personally.After 4 days, I finally did it. I finally made a map of New York with 45 Congressional District, just like in its hay day.
Tell me what y'all think. I really should be asleep right now.
South Carolina chose its electors by the state legislature without popular vote. It's just electionatlas showing it that way (20% shade).What's up with SC?