Alternate Apolitical / Right-Leaning 70s Subcultures

In a scenario where America defeated Communism in Korea during the Korean War as well as Vietnam (along with Indochina in general) by the mid-late 1960s and where Mod subculture was successfully exported to America (being a relatively close 2nd behind the dominant Hippie movement).

What alternate apolitical / right-leaning (possibly European-influenced) subcultures could have appeared in the early-mid 1970s without ending up associated with the far-left or far-right (and being essentially the intentional antithesis of the Freak, Hippie, Glam and Disco scenes)?
 
The only subculture that I can think of that might fit the bill are skinheads. There was/is a pretty big range of political leanings among skinheads, but depending on the world in your TL, you could get some in the US who were only moderately right-leaning (rather than far-right) and make the more politically neutral skins more widespread and better-known. The latter seems especially possible if mods become a bigger thing in the US from the very beginning, then 1960s skins become popular there as well, and in the late 70s you get lots of skins who favour a return to their roots and less focus on far-left or far-right politics.

Otherwise, you might have to create some of your own. The reason why so many subcultures happened the way they did in OTL is precisely because they were subcultures, and didn't fit the norm of mainstream culture. If the US win in Korea and Vietnam, if the USSR still exists and is a big enough threat you will still get at least some of the same rejection of left-wing politics as you did in OTL. The only way I can think of neutral or moderately right-leaning tendencies being more prevalent is if those points of view are much less prevalent in mainstream culture.
 
There were, to some extent, right-leaning subcultures at the time: the John Birch Society, the YAF (basically young Republicans using Communist-style "entryist" tactics to try to shift the party right), and (though far, far from uniformly right-wing) arguably hex-and-counter wargaming.
 
The reason I brought up a scenario about America winning in Korea, Vietnam, etc, is mainly because the Hippies in my mind were largely associated with the Anti-War movement in the OTL and the impact an American victory would have had on the movement would have been interesting (which in my mind would not quite take the stream out of the Hippies).

As for the Skinheads, the challenge would be how to create some distance (or external differences) between the mainstream Skinheads (or Sharps aka Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice / S.H.A.R.P) and the Neo-Nazi/White-Power Skinheads so the Skinheads as a whole are not tarred with the same brush due to the actions of the latter?

It would also be interesting to see subcultures like the Skinheads and Punks becoming a lot more popular among non-whites then they were in OTL (with Afro-Punk being a minority within the Punk scene), though I am having trouble figuring out how to have a musical genre like say for example Latin / Afro-Cuban Punk Jazz or Metal Blues spawn an altogether new subculture.

http://www.afropunk.com/profiles/blogs/an-oxymorons-dream-the-black
 
Last edited:
This might be a bit outside the box, and doesn't fit certain definitions of "right wing" (especially if one is using conservative Christianity as a baseline), but... how about Satanism?

IOTL, Satanism, as conceptualized by Anton LaVey in the '60s, can be summed up as a mix of Ayn Rand and Nietzsche with the theatrics of Aleister Crowley thrown on top. The philosophy underlying the Church of Satan, which LaVey called the "Left-Hand Path", was rooted in a rejection of egalitarianism, a celebration of egotism, and a vicious social Darwinism. It preaches that one should give kindness only to those who deserve it, show responsibility only to the responsible, get revenge on those who wronged you rather than turning the other cheek, and most importantly, be ferociously independent from any person or institution who might try to hold you back, churches and states alike. A lot of what LaVey was saying was pretty much a more extreme version of what many early libertarians and anarcho-capitalists were arguing.

Maybe, instead of LaVey, the founder of Satanism is a guy who's less of a showman and more interested in creating a lasting religious movement, meaning that this alt-Satanism doesn't get seen as a media oddity and a circus sideshow by holding Black Masses for reporters. It might not even be called Satanism; LaVey came up with that in order to draw that kind of attention to his movement and philosophy. IOTL, there was a splinter group in the '70s called the Temple of Set that tried to do this (and is still around), but by that time Satanism's fifteen minutes were over and nobody cared. Here, these guys are running the show right from the start. Libertarians, feeling isolated amidst the neocons and Christian Right types who are taking over the GOP, gravitate to *Satanism after one or two high-profile libertarian leaders starts extolling its virtues. *Satanism enters the public consciousness not as a flash in the pan, but a right-wing/libertarian version of the New Age movement, a religion of proudly egotistical elitists. (Kinda like Objectivism.;))
 
This might be a bit outside the box, and doesn't fit certain definitions of "right wing" (especially if one is using conservative Christianity as a baseline), but... how about Satanism?

IOTL, Satanism, as conceptualized by Anton LaVey in the '60s, can be summed up as a mix of Ayn Rand and Nietzsche with the theatrics of Aleister Crowley thrown on top. The philosophy underlying the Church of Satan, which LaVey called the "Left-Hand Path", was rooted in a rejection of egalitarianism, a celebration of egotism, and a vicious social Darwinism. It preaches that one should give kindness only to those who deserve it, show responsibility only to the responsible, get revenge on those who wronged you rather than turning the other cheek, and most importantly, be ferociously independent from any person or institution who might try to hold you back, churches and states alike. A lot of what LaVey was saying was pretty much a more extreme version of what many early libertarians and anarcho-capitalists were arguing.

Maybe, instead of LaVey, the founder of Satanism is a guy who's less of a showman and more interested in creating a lasting religious movement, meaning that this alt-Satanism doesn't get seen as a media oddity and a circus sideshow by holding Black Masses for reporters. It might not even be called Satanism; LaVey came up with that in order to draw that kind of attention to his movement and philosophy. IOTL, there was a splinter group in the '70s called the Temple of Set that tried to do this (and is still around), but by that time Satanism's fifteen minutes were over and nobody cared. Here, these guys are running the show right from the start. Libertarians, feeling isolated amidst the neocons and Christian Right types who are taking over the GOP, gravitate to *Satanism after one or two high-profile libertarian leaders starts extolling its virtues. *Satanism enters the public consciousness not as a flash in the pan, but a right-wing/libertarian version of the New Age movement, a religion of proudly egotistical elitists. (Kinda like Objectivism.;))

Interesting idea

One could call a lasting version of non-LaVey Satanism something like Lucifelism / Lucifelianism and weave together a narrative of Lucifel (as opposed to Lucifer) being the original Atlas, John Galt or Emmanuel Goldstein and go from there (somehow implying that it was Heaven aka the original "State" that forced him to finally shrug).
 
Last edited:
Top