I would not want to fly one of these against any contemporary japanese fighter.... Would they be better than a Hurricane for that situation though?Members of the Royal Australian Air Force are photographed with the Morane-Saulnier M.S. 406's used to defend Darwin against Japanese raiders. Australia began building the M.S. 406 under licence in March 1939.
Yes and no.I would not want to fly one of these against any contemporary japanese fighter.... Would they be better than a Hurricane for that situation though?
Uh what? MS406 always was slower than the Hurri.Yes and no.
It was almost a hundred kph faster than the Hurricane, but still slower than the Zero, while a bit less agile. But in any case they will be less of a sitting duck, with decent pilots.
Ops, yes you are right, I had a brainfart. Teh Hurricane was 40 to 50 kph faster, IIRC I had in mind the first one speed as kilometers and the second as miles per hour, that was my mistake ...Uh what? MS406 always was slower than the Hurri.
By 1942 the MS 406 would only be good for training, unlike the Hurricane which was still a good ground attack aircraft and a just about adequate fighter in the hands of an experienced pilot.I would not want to fly one of these against any contemporary japanese fighter.... Would they be better than a Hurricane for that situation though?
I still need to find a good book on the technical aspects of the french airforce in the 30s and 40s. From what I could find the Dewoitine D.520 was more or less the best fighter they had and also should have had a development potential comparable to similiar planes used by other nations.By 1942 the MS 406 would only be good for training, unlike the Hurricane which was still a good ground attack aircraft and a just about adequate fighter in the hands of an experienced pilot.
I still need to find a good book on the technical aspects of the french airforce in the 30s and 40s. From what I could find the Dewoitine D.520 was more or less the best fighter they had and also should have had a development potential comparable to similiar planes used by other nations.
The finns managed to get some succes with the modified 406s they used but I always wondered what kind of development potential that plane had left. If I remember correctly the airframe was rather primitive?
It's a great McPherson-ism, I hope you don't mind if I borrow it!That. (^^^)
Same day rules change as the Bezos flight is the "thumb in the eye" "Richard" bureaucratic move. As an American I recognize the timing and the real motive behind the "rules change".FAA has clear rules about space flight and astro naught qualifications be fore the flights of Star ship galactic 2 and Blue Dream
Jeff Bezos and Sir Richard Branson may not be astronauts, US says
The US government has tightened rules on which space-goers can claim their astronaut wings.www.bbc.com
How convenient.New Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules say astronaut hopefuls must be part of the flight crew and make contributions to space flight safety.
That means Jeff Bezos and Sir Richard Branson may not yet be astronauts in the eyes of the US government.
Note that?These are the first changes since the FAA wings programme began in 2004.
Timing is everything. Wait until the feat is attempted and then announce, "Nope. I changed the rules. Your rocket ride does not qualify." Even though both billionaires met the "Hamm the Chimp" astronaut wings requirement?The Commercial Astronaut Wings programme updates were announced on Tuesday - the same day that Amazon's Mr Bezos flew aboard a Blue Origin rocket to the edge of space.
Before the rules change.To qualify as commercial astronauts, space-goers must travel 50 miles (80km) above the Earth's surface, which both Mr Bezos and Mr Branson accomplished.
That was the rules change. How about "proofing the system" as part of the "Man-rating crew payload"?But altitude aside, the agency says would-be astronauts must have also "demonstrated activities during flight that were essential to public safety, or contributed to human space flight safety".
How convenient. Can take away an achievement by a mere regulation edit.What exactly counts as such is determined by FAA officials.
Look, I am not a fan of Jeff Bezos at all, but he did climb aboard a flying BOMB and he did man-rate it.In a statement, the FAA said that these changes brought the wings scheme more in line with its role to protect public safety during commercial space flights.
View attachment 668541
Unmarked prior to their delivery to the Norwegian air force in 1940 a Vultee Vanguard righter prepares to take off for a test flight. The fighters would Soon see much action against the Luftwaffe during the Norwegian campaign. Catching German craft totally off guard as intelligence failed to notice these fighters being delivered (rather embarrassing as the the Kriegsmarine knew of the delivery but failed to inform the Heer or Luftwaffe) allowing them to achieve surprising results.
The planes had originally been a part of an order placed by Sweden, but the order fell apart due to a number of reasons. The planes eventually being taken by the RAF as part of Lend Lease, and then being donated to Norway as part of a British plan to form an alliance with them during the phony war. In total twenty four of the type would be delivered.