20210723_114700.jpg

They somehow planned for a 747 trijet i mean o do get the idea less engine > less cost but can it work tho?
 
Members of the Royal Australian Air Force are photographed with the Morane-Saulnier M.S. 406's used to defend Darwin against Japanese raiders. Australia began building the M.S. 406 under licence in March 1939.

1627019759935.png
 
Members of the Royal Australian Air Force are photographed with the Morane-Saulnier M.S. 406's used to defend Darwin against Japanese raiders. Australia began building the M.S. 406 under licence in March 1939.
I would not want to fly one of these against any contemporary japanese fighter.... Would they be better than a Hurricane for that situation though?
 
I would not want to fly one of these against any contemporary japanese fighter.... Would they be better than a Hurricane for that situation though?
Yes and no.

It was almost a hundred kph faster than the Hurricane, but still slower than the Zero, while a bit less agile. But in any case they will be less of a sitting duck, with decent pilots.

EDIT: Yeah, Bougnas is right, I made a stupid mistake. So even more toasted.
 
Last edited:
Yes and no.

It was almost a hundred kph faster than the Hurricane, but still slower than the Zero, while a bit less agile. But in any case they will be less of a sitting duck, with decent pilots.
Uh what? MS406 always was slower than the Hurri.
 
I would not want to fly one of these against any contemporary japanese fighter.... Would they be better than a Hurricane for that situation though?
By 1942 the MS 406 would only be good for training, unlike the Hurricane which was still a good ground attack aircraft and a just about adequate fighter in the hands of an experienced pilot.
 
By 1942 the MS 406 would only be good for training, unlike the Hurricane which was still a good ground attack aircraft and a just about adequate fighter in the hands of an experienced pilot.
I still need to find a good book on the technical aspects of the french airforce in the 30s and 40s. From what I could find the Dewoitine D.520 was more or less the best fighter they had and also should have had a development potential comparable to similiar planes used by other nations.
The finns managed to get some succes with the modified 406s they used but I always wondered what kind of development potential that plane had left. If I remember correctly the airframe was rather primitive?
 
I still need to find a good book on the technical aspects of the french airforce in the 30s and 40s. From what I could find the Dewoitine D.520 was more or less the best fighter they had and also should have had a development potential comparable to similiar planes used by other nations.
The finns managed to get some succes with the modified 406s they used but I always wondered what kind of development potential that plane had left. If I remember correctly the airframe was rather primitive?

The M.S. 406 actually had quite a decent airframe and was quite maneuverable, but its biggest problem by far was that it was underpowered. It had an ~800hp engine in an era where contemporaries were in the 4-figure club. It was somewhat lightly armed too, with 1 20mm cannon and 2 rifle-calibre MGs, the latter tended to freeze at high altitudes too.

Engine supply was a problem too- Poland and Belgium expressed interest in the type too, but France couldn't even produce enough engines for her own requirements.

There was a 1939 development, the MS. 410, which included a more powerful engine that boosted top speed to 315mph, an extra pair of machine guns with heating, and a better windscreen and gunsight. Existing 406s could also be upgraded into 410s in as little as 2-3 weeks- the French government started to implement conversions and canceled them when war broke out.

IIRC, the 406/410 were easier to mass produce than the Dewoitine D.520 as well.

The TL;DR is that the M.S. 406 is a decent plane in 1938 but without continued improvements, is outclassed by 1940. The biggest problem is watts-through-props.
 

McPherson

Banned
FAA has clear rules about space flight and astro naught qualifications be fore the flights of Star ship galactic 2 and Blue Dream

Same day rules change as the Bezos flight is the "thumb in the eye" "Richard" bureaucratic move. As an American I recognize the timing and the real motive behind the "rules change".

New Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules say astronaut hopefuls must be part of the flight crew and make contributions to space flight safety.
That means Jeff Bezos and Sir Richard Branson may not yet be astronauts in the eyes of the US government.
How convenient.
These are the first changes since the FAA wings programme began in 2004.
Note that?
The Commercial Astronaut Wings programme updates were announced on Tuesday - the same day that Amazon's Mr Bezos flew aboard a Blue Origin rocket to the edge of space.
Timing is everything. Wait until the feat is attempted and then announce, "Nope. I changed the rules. Your rocket ride does not qualify." Even though both billionaires met the "Hamm the Chimp" astronaut wings requirement?
To qualify as commercial astronauts, space-goers must travel 50 miles (80km) above the Earth's surface, which both Mr Bezos and Mr Branson accomplished.
Before the rules change.
But altitude aside, the agency says would-be astronauts must have also "demonstrated activities during flight that were essential to public safety, or contributed to human space flight safety".
That was the rules change. How about "proofing the system" as part of the "Man-rating crew payload"?
What exactly counts as such is determined by FAA officials.
How convenient. Can take away an achievement by a mere regulation edit.
In a statement, the FAA said that these changes brought the wings scheme more in line with its role to protect public safety during commercial space flights.
Look, I am not a fan of Jeff Bezos at all, but he did climb aboard a flying BOMB and he did man-rate it.

Give him his wings and STFU.
 
In late 1941 Australia begins developing an Improved version of the MS 406 using the Rolls Royce Merlin. It is very similar to the later Finnish Morko. Some are sent to Canada for use as advanced trainers and to provide some defence for the West coast in the unlikely event of a Japanese attack.

1627158360367.png
 
USAAF-Vultee-P-66.jpg


Unmarked prior to their delivery to the Norwegian air force in 1940 a Vultee Vanguard righter prepares to take off for a test flight. The fighters would Soon see much action against the Luftwaffe during the Norwegian campaign. Catching German craft totally off guard as intelligence failed to notice these fighters being delivered (rather embarrassing as the the Kriegsmarine knew of the delivery but failed to inform the Heer or Luftwaffe) allowing them to achieve surprising results.

The planes had originally been a part of an order placed by Sweden, but the order fell apart due to a number of reasons. The planes eventually being taken by the RAF as part of Lend Lease, and then being donated to Norway as part of a British plan to form an alliance with them during the phony war. In total twenty four of the type would be delivered.
 
Empress17.jpg
An Grumman Hellcat F.Mk.I preparing to launch on HMS Courageous*, 24th December 1944, on the North Sea

On the December 23rd 1944, the Germans forces where approaching Antwerp, after defeating the British in the First Battle of Waterloo. Churchill, in a panic, ordered any warship and FAA squadrons at their disposal to the North Sea (and if possible, Antwerp), to support the remaining 21st Army Group based there. Several carriers were also send, with all sort of frontlines aircrafts possible (some even with the Far East roundel already painted).

On the 24rd, the most deadly day of the Battle of Belgium, an Rattenkrieg (Rat War)-style of house-to-house fighting occured in Antwerp itself, while the RN battleships and cruisers (including the brand new HMS Lion, and the old "reliable" Warspite) bombard any German unit in range. In the meanwhile, USAAF, RAF, FAA, and other Allied squadrons (including the Greek one) fought against the Luftwaffe**.

*HMS Courageous was damaged by a torpedo in 1939. In 1942, been a "younger" carrier that HMS Furious, it was decided send her to the US and rebuilt the carrier, allowing to handle 55 modern aircraft in comparation to the previous 30 it could handle prior.
**Operation Bodenplatte is cancelled, and all avaiable Luftwaffe squadrons are used to support the Third Invasion of Belgium (first in 1940 and second the allied liberation in 44)
 
View attachment 668541

Unmarked prior to their delivery to the Norwegian air force in 1940 a Vultee Vanguard righter prepares to take off for a test flight. The fighters would Soon see much action against the Luftwaffe during the Norwegian campaign. Catching German craft totally off guard as intelligence failed to notice these fighters being delivered (rather embarrassing as the the Kriegsmarine knew of the delivery but failed to inform the Heer or Luftwaffe) allowing them to achieve surprising results.

The planes had originally been a part of an order placed by Sweden, but the order fell apart due to a number of reasons. The planes eventually being taken by the RAF as part of Lend Lease, and then being donated to Norway as part of a British plan to form an alliance with them during the phony war. In total twenty four of the type would be delivered.

Not top tier but in the right place they could have been devestating. I think in the Norweigan campaign there was a couple times when the Germans used large numbers of unescorted JU-52s to drop paratroopers or rapidly move troops in via captured airfields. Even a Vultee Vanguard would slaughter those lumbering Junkers. A squadron in the right place could kill a couple thousand German troops in the air and devestat the Luftwaffes transport plane force. Do enough damage and something like Crete might be off the table even with the Norweigans conquered.
 
Top