All Popes after 1903 are conservative

The XX century in the Catholic Church presented great changes when it comes to the ideological question of each pope, starting a seesaw between liberal, moderate and conservative popes, first in 1903 the disputed election of the conservative antimodernist Pius X took place, followed by the liberal Benedict XV, then the moderate Pius XI, the conservative anti-communist Pius XII, the moderate John XXIII and the liberal Paul VI who carried out Vatican II, followed by John Paul I, and the moderate conservatives John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
How different would it be though if all conclaves after 1903 had elected conservative popes, from moderates to radicals, here is a short list of the popes I envisioned for this scenario:
Pontifical number / Papal name / Life / Age at the beginning/end of the papacy / Papacy / Duration of the papacy / Personal name / Place of birth
257° Pope Pius X (1835-1914) (68/79) (1903-1914) (11) (Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto) (Riese, Treviso, Lombardy–Venetia, Austrian Empire)
258° Pope Pius XI (1852-1918) (62/65) (1914-1918) (4) (Domenico Serafini) (Rome, Papal States)
259° Pope Gregory XVII (1865-1936) (53/70) (1918-1936) (18) (Rafael Merry Del Val) (London, United Kingdom, although he was born in London he was spanish)
260° Pope Pius XII (1876-1958) (60/82) (1936-1958) (22) (Eugenio Pacelli) (Rome, Italy)
261° Pope Gregory XVIII (1906-1989) (52/82) (1958-1989) (31) (Giuseppe Siri) (Genoa, Italy)
I really don't know who would succeed Siri, any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Might be too many Italians. I feel Catholics are happier knowing that Germans, Poles, Latin Americans, and others have a shot at the Papacy. Admittedly, that was just in the past forty years or so. Might be interesting seeing how Mussolini deals with a non-Italian Pope.
 
Lefebvre- assuming the split never happens ITTL
If Lefebvre had been elected in 1989 he would have been about 83 years old, although without Paul VI there would have been no "Ingravescentem Aetatem", even so I doubt the cardinals would elect someone that old (the oldest popes to be elected were Clement XII and Benedict XVI , both were 78 when elected)
But let's assume he would have been elected pope anyway:
Pontifical number / Papal name / Life / Age at the beginning/end of the papacy / Papacy / Duration of the papacy / Personal name / Place of birth
257° Pope Pius X (1835-1914) (68/79) (1903-1914) (11) (Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto) (Riese, Treviso, Lombardy–Venetia, Austrian Empire)
258° Pope Pius XI (1852-1918) (62/65) (1914-1918) (4) (Domenico Serafini) (Rome, Papal States)
259° Pope Gregory XVII (1865-1936) (53/70) (1918-1936) (18) (Rafael Merry Del Val) (London, United Kingdom, although he was born in London he was Spanish)
260° Pope Pius XII (1876-1958) (60/82) (1936-1958) (22) (Eugenio Pacelli) (Rome, Italy)
261° Pope Gregory XVIII (1906-1989) (52/82) (1958-1989) (31) (Giuseppe Siri) (Genoa, Italy)
262° Pope Pius XIII (1905-1991) (83/85) (1989-1991) (2) (Marcel Lefebvre) (Tourcoing, France)
After that (he died in 1991)... perhaps one of the OTL Superior Generals of a traditionalist order?
Any names? perhaps Cardinal Koenig (although at this point he is 86) or Salvatore Pappalardo (who is 73)
 
I wonder -what if there'd been no Vatican II?
Honestly, I think a new council would happen anyway, although not in OTL 1962, probably in the 70's, 80's or at most 90's
The impetus is still there, as Pius XII I believe took some steps in that direction, but the ramifications of such a council would not have been as damaging as the OTL council was
If this council happens, it will be more like a Vatican Council I part 2 than the OTL Vatican II, some of the more radical changes after Vatican II, like the mass facing the people and the total abandonment of Latin, chants and polyphony definitely would not happen.
 
How does this differ from the "Siri instead of Roncalli in 1958" threads that are common enough here? https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1958-siri-instead-of-roncalli.481338/ https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/cardinal-siri-elected-pope-in-1958.134940/ You still have Pacelli (incidentally, I would argue that calling him a "conservative" is an oversimplification--but then you never define "liberal' or conservative") as his predecessor and I doubt that the changes in earlier Popes do much more than to introduce unnecessary butterflies...
 
The “liberal” and “conservative” labels have little meaning in regard of the Catholic Church, if not for a question of words choice and pastoral approach. Pious XII is widely considered a sort of fascist theocratic ruler but he protected thousands of Jews and anti-fascists during WWII, didn’t recognize Israel and declared the theory of evolution as part of Catholic teachings. Meanwhile, Pope Francis is judged a sort of progressive liberal anti-dogmatic reformer although he openly compared abortion with paying a hit man, condemned the gender theory and expressed his most firm adversity for “human wast culture” that supports elders euthanasia and legal suicide.
 
Top