Tiger Force: Northrop P-61C-25NO Black Widow
Link:
www.whatifmodellers.com/index.…
Northrop P-61C-25NO Black Widow
a/c #38353, GQ-B, 2 Big and 2 Heavy/Little Annie
134 Squadron, 153 Wing, Tiger Force, Royal Air Force
Kangnung, UN-occupied southern Korea, 28 February 1946
By late 1944 it was apparent that the original concept of the RAF's Tiger Force deployment to the Far East needed to be changed. Gone was the strategic focus on a large number of Lancaster squadrons supported by escort fighters, replaced by a balanced tactical force concept to support a possible invasion of the Japanese Home Islands. This latter vision of Tiger Force required heavy and medium bombers, fighters-bombers, transports, gliders, liaison and observation aircraft and night fighters. Concerned about employing wooden de Havilland Mosquito night fighters to the Far East, the RAF organised for the delivery of the Northrop P-61 Black Widow through Lend-Lease.
After training in the US, the P-61C equipped 153 Wing deployed to Okinawa, arriving in September 1945. After conducting a series of Potato defensive patrols, during October they moved to Kangnung in UN-occupied southern Korea. Here they encountered the occasional Japanese night intruder, shooting down 3 of these before the invasion of Honshu.
With aerial targets few and far between, Tiger Force commanders sensed a growing restlessness amongst their Black Widow crews. Boredom and complacency had set in, which, coupled with deteriorating weather, contributed to several preventable flying incidents in late December, forcing a temporary grounding. When flying resumed, the Wing began training for offensive operations. Fortunately, their unique P-61C-25NO Black Widows had been built to RAF specifications that included a robust, long-range offensive capability. In addition to the 310 US gallon drop tanks routinely carried, the external load could include bombs or napalm and 8 5 inch HVAR rockets. The type lacked the P-61's top gun turret, allowing the fuselage nacelle to be slimmer, which reduced drag and enabled the installation of a fuel tank in place of the turret mechanism. The deletion of the turret also meant that its complicated sighting and control gear was omitted, along with the need for a third crewman, the gunner. A modified gunner's position was retained, though, and would sometimes be used for a navigator during long-range missions or an observer on sorties requiring an airborne spotter or forward air controller.
On the night of 3 February 1946, the crews of 153 Wing launched their offensive campaign against Japan, mounting Cucumber armed night reconnaissance patrols to interdict enemy supply routes. These intruder operations were mostly over and around Kyushu, Shikoku and southern Honshu. Following the invasion of Honshu, they engaged in a range of new nocturnal activities, including Celery close air support missions, Fennel spotting sorties for naval gunfire and Tomato airborne forward air control operations. Air-to-air activity included Potato air defence and Turnip escort and sweep operations, protecting the 24-hour airlift corridors established between Honshu and southern Korea. By VJ Day, RAF Black Widow crews had been credited with shooting down 11 Japanese aircraft.
On 27 February 1946, the crew of 2 Big and Two Heavy were pilot Flight Lieutenant Harry Kane, radar operator Flight Lieutenant Jordan Pickford and navigator Flying Officer Ben White mounting their third Cabbage mission. Cabbages were conducted in concert with the
RAAF Douglas PDB-1 lnvaders of 453 Squadron, pairing a Black Widow with a single Invader and both using standard Invader call signs. This combination was prompted by an uptick in Japanese night fighter activity that saw Invaders performing Pomegranate patrol and heckler missions repeatedly approached by interceptors. No engagements had been recorded, but the enemy's intent was clear, the Australians avoiding contact through evasion after warnings from radar controllers.
The reasoning behind the Cabbage mission was rewarded just after 2AM on February 28. After a fruitless patrol over northern Kyushu dogged by low cloud, the Black Widow crew and their 453 Squadron partners worked over their diversionary target, a rail marshalling yard in Fukuoka. The crews of both aircraft made several passes: both fired rockets, the Invader also dropping 500 lb bombs while the Black Widow dropped its two M29 cluster bombs. A radio alert from a Royal Navy radar picket ship off the coast came as they were climbing away from the target. A lone Japanese plane had taken off from the nearby Mushiroda Airfield and was pursuing the UN airmen. The Japanese pilot was Captain Maya Yoshida of the
56th Hiko Sentai, flying a Nakajima Ki-43 III Hayabusa. Although operated by a dedicated night fighter unit, the Hayabusa was a standard day fighter model that had been slightly modified for nocturnal missions after delivery. The Black Widow crew turned to meet their prey, achieved a radar return from the fighter and maneuvered into a firing position. From the moment they were warned to the time the Japanese fighter disintegrated under the withering fire of their 4 20mm cannon was less than 5 minutes. Captain Yoshida was killed in the incident and the 56th Hiko Sentai would refrain from making further intercept attempts of the RAAF Invaders until the night of the UN's invasion of Honshu.
The aircraft and its crew were photographed during the afternoon of February 28, their Black Widow marked with a Japanese flag to symbolise the kill. Under the flag were 10 yellow bomb symbols, one for each of the plane’s current total of Cabbage and Cucumber interdiction missions. The portside nose art 2 Big and Two Heavy quotes a comment made by Flt. Lt. Kane during his first Black Widow walkaround during training in the US. The Little Annie starboard nose art is a reference to Flt. Lt. Pickford’s girlfriend. Both men survived the war, but F/O White was killed when, on a Cucumber mission in another Black Widow, his plane was shot down by flak near Kaminaka whilst interdicting rail traffic on the Obama Line 2 nights before the Y-Day invasion. 2 Big and Two Heavy/Little Annie was written-off after a landing accident at Kangnung on 2 May, 1946.
Romanian Messerschmitt Me 410 A-1-U5
Link:
www.whatifmodellers.com/index.…
a/c 48, 41st Bomber Squadron, 8th Bomber Group, Royal Romanian Air Force
Mykolaiv, Axis-occupied Ukraine, December 1943
Personal mount of Căpitan-Comando Mirel Rădoi (pilot) and Sergent Vlad Chiricheș (gunner)
When Romania joined the Axis offensive into the nations of the Moscow Pact, the Romanian Air Force had a large but obsolete inventory of light bombers. This included 63 Fairey Battles that had been sent to Romania for use by Poland in August and September 1939, the plan having been for the Poles to train on the Battles in Romania. When the German invasion of Poland put paid to this, the Battles were simply delivered to the Romanian Air Force. 32 PZL.23 Kara light bombers flown to Romania by escaping Polish aircrew filled out the light bomber brigades.
Neither type could be replaced by more of the same, so Romania looked to its new Axis allies for other designs that could replace its diminishing light bomber force. Dazzled by the sleek and hi-tech promise of the Me 210, Romania and Germany agreed on an order for 150 Me 210 A-2s in November 1941. However, as the Me 210 program suffered from a series of delays due to dangerous handling problems, Romania was forced to find alternatives to replace the substantial combat attrition its bombers were experiencing on the Eastern Front. To compensate for the Me 210’s failure, the RLM provided a mix of Hs 129 B-2 and Ju 87Ds to Romania, but neither in sufficient numbers to replace attrition. Although Romanian and Bulgarian relations were strained due to territorial disputes, the Romanian's were desperate and even ordered the
Bulgarian DAR-12 in 1942.
By 1943 the Me 210 program and had been replaced by the Me 410 and these became available to the Romanians in the second half of the year. The 41st Bomber Squadron, 8th Bomber Group entered combat with the Me 410 in December. All were of the Me 410 A-1/U5 version, which featured underwing racks for 50 kg bombs. The Romanians had required this feature because, unlike the Luftwaffe, they intended to use the Me 410 as a close air support bomber capable of flying several sorties a day. They were concerned that the standard loadout, which concentrated the bombload around the aircraft’s nose, would cause delays in turn arounds as armourers got in each other’s way. The U5 modification allowed the internal bomb bay and the underwing racks to be loaded simultaneously.
The aircraft is depicted here as armed with two SD 250s in the internal bomb bay and four SD 50s underwing. Combinations of SC 50/SC 250 general-purpose bombs and SD 50/SD 250 fragmentation bombs comprised the standard loadouts used by Romanian ‘410s. Using these bombs and their internal guns, crews attacked troop concentrations, frontline logistical centres and columns on the move, provided fire support for troops in contact and flew armed reconnaissance missions. Each aircraft routinely flew several sorties a day.
Pilot Căpitan-Comando Mirel Rădoi was killed in action on 23 March 1944 when flying Me 410 a/c 41, his plane was shot down by Red flak. Gunner Sergent Vlad Chiricheș was injured in the same incident, taken prisoner and survived the war.
Vintoplan
Link:
www.flickr.com/photos/dizzyfug…
Some background:
The РТАК-30 attack vintoplan (also known as vintokryl) owed its existence to the Mil Mi-30 plane/helicopter project that originated in 1972. The Mil Mi-30 was conceived as a transport aircraft that could hold up to 19 passengers or two tons of cargo, and its purpose was to replace the Mi-8 and Mi-17 Helicopters in both civil and military roles. With vertical takeoff through a pair of tiltrotor engine pods on the wing tips (similar in layout to the later V-22 Osprey) and the ability to fly like a normal plane, the Mil Mi-30 had a clear advantage over the older models.
Since the vintoplan concept was a completely new field of research and engineering, a dedicated design bureau was installed in the mid-Seventies at the Rostov-na-Donu helicopter factory, where most helicopters from the Mil design bureau were produced, under the title Ростов Тилт Ротор Авиационная Компания (Rostov Tilt Rotor Aircraft Company), or РТАК (RTRA), for short.
The vintoplan project lingered for some time, with basic research being conducted concerning aerodynamics, rotor design and flight control systems. Many findings later found their way into conventional planes and helicopters. At the beginning of the 1980s, the project had progressed far enough that the vintoplan received official backing so that РТАК scientists and Mil helicopter engineers assembled and tested several layouts and components for this complicated aircraft type.
At that time the Mil Mi-30 vintoplan was expected to use a single TV3-117 Turbo Shaft Engine with a four-bladed propeller rotors on each of its two pairs of stub wings of almost equal span. The engine was still installed in the fuselage and the proprotors driven by long shafts.
However, while being a very clean design, this original layout revealed several problems concerning aeroelasticity, dynamics of construction, characteristics for the converter apparatuses, aerodynamics and flight dynamics. In the course of further development stages and attempts to rectify the technical issues, the vintoplan layout went through several revisions. The layout shifted consequently from having 4 smaller engines in rotating pods on two pairs of stub wings through three engines with rotating nacelles on the front wings and a fixed, horizontal rotor over the tail and finally back to only 2 engines (much like the initial concept), but this time mounted in rotating nacelles on the wing tips and a canard stabilizer layout.
In August 1981 the Commission of the Presidium of the USSR Council of Ministers on weapons eventually issued a decree on the development of a flyworthy Mil Mi-30 vintoplan prototype. Shortly afterwards the military approved of the vintoplan, too, but desired bigger, more powerful engines in order to improve performance and weight capacity. In the course of the ensuing project refinement, the weight capacity was raised to 3-5 tons and the passenger limit to 32. In parallel, the modified type was also foreseen for civil operations as a short range feederliner, potentially replacing Yak-40 and An-24 airliners in Aeroflot service.
In 1982, РТАК took the interest from the military and proposed a dedicated attack vintoplan, based on former research and existing components of the original transport variant. This project was accepted by MAP and received the separate designation РТАК-30. However, despite having some close technical relations to the Mi-30 transport (primarily the engine nacelles, their rotation mechanism and the flight control systems), the РТАК-30 was a completely different aircraft. The timing was good, though, and the proposal was met with much interest, since the innovative vintoplan concept was to compete against traditional helicopters: the design work on the dedicated Mi-28 and Ka-50 attack helicopters had just started at that time, too, so that РТАК received green lights for the construction of five prototypes: four flyworthy machines plus one more for static ground tests.
The РТАК-30 was based on one of the early Mi-30 layouts and it combined two pairs of mid-set wings with different wing spans with a tall tail fin that ensured directional stability. Each wing carried a rotating engine nacelle with a so-called proprotor on its tip, each with three high aspect ratio blades. The proprotors were handed (i.e. revolved in opposite directions) in order to minimize torque effects and improve handling, esp. in the hover. The front and back pair of engines were cross-linked among each other on a common driveshaft, eliminating engine-out asymmetric thrust problems during V/STOL operations. In the event of the failure of one engine, it would automatically disconnect through torque spring clutches and both propellers on a pair of wings would be driven by the remaining engine.
Four engines were chosen because, despite the weight and complexity penalty, this extra power was expected to be required in order to achieve a performance that was markedly superior to a conventional helicopter like the Mi-24, the primary Soviet attack helicopter of that era the РТАК-30 was supposed to replace. It was also expected that the rotating nacelles could also be used to improve agility in level flight through a mild form of vectored thrust.
The РТАК-30’s streamlined fuselage provided ample space for avionics, fuel, a fully retractable tricycle landing gear and a two man crew in an armored side-by-side cockpit with ejection seats. The windshield was able to withstand 12.7–14.5 mm caliber bullets, the titanium cockpit tub could take hits from 20 mm cannon. An autonomous power unit (APU) was housed in the fuselage, too, making operations of the aircraft independent from ground support.
While the РТАК-30 was not intended for use as a transport, the fuselage was spacious enough to have a small compartment between the front wings spars, capable of carrying up to three people. The purpose of this was the rescue of downed helicopter crews, as a cargo hold esp. for transfer flights and as additional space for future mission equipment or extra fuel.
In vertical flight, the РТАК-30’s tiltrotor system used controls very similar to a twin or tandem-rotor helicopter. Yaw was controlled by tilting its rotors in opposite directions. Roll was provided through differential power or thrust, supported by ailerons on the rear wings. Pitch was provided through rotor cyclic or nacelle tilt and further aerodynamic surfaces on both pairs of wings. Vertical motion was controlled with conventional rotor blade pitch and a control similar to a fixed-wing engine control called a thrust control lever (TCL). The rotor heads had elastomeric bearings and the proprotor blades were made from composite materials, which could sustain 30 mm shells.
The РТАК-30 featured a helmet-mounted display for the pilot, a very modern development at its time. The pilot designated targets for the navigator/weapons officer, who proceeded to fire the weapons required to fulfill that particular task. The integrated surveillance and fire control system had two optical channels providing wide and narrow fields of view, a narrow-field-of-view optical television channel, and a laser rangefinder. The system could move within 110 degrees in azimuth and from +13 to −40 degrees in elevation and was placed in a spherical dome on top of the fuselage, just behind the cockpit.
The aircraft carried one automatic 2A42 30 mm internal gun, mounted semi-rigidly fixed near the center of the fuselage, movable only slightly in elevation and azimuth. The arrangement was also regarded as being more practical than a classic free-turning turret mount for the aircraft’s considerably higher flight speed than a normal helicopter. As a side effect, the semi-rigid mounting improved the cannon's accuracy, giving the 30 mm a longer practical range and better hit ratio at medium ranges. Ammunition supply was 460 rounds, with separate compartments for high-fragmentation, explosive incendiary, or armor-piercing rounds. The type of ammunition could be selected by the pilot during flight.
The gunner can select one of two rates of full automatic fire, low at 200 to 300 rds/min and high at 550 to 800 rds/min. The effective range when engaging ground targets such as light armored vehicles is 1,500 m, while soft-skinned targets can be engaged out to 4,000 m. Air targets can be engaged flying at low altitudes of up to 2,000 m and up to a slant range of 2,500 m.
A substantial range of weapons could be carried on four hardpoints under the front wings, plus three more under the fuselage, for a total ordnance of up to 2,500 kg (with reduced internal fuel). The РТАК-30‘s main armament comprised up to 24 laser-guided Vikhr missiles with a maximum range of some 8 km. These tube-launched missiles could be used against ground and aerial targets. A search and tracking radar was housed in a thimble radome on the РТАК-30’s nose and their laser guidance system (mounted in a separate turret under the radome) was reported to be virtually jam-proof. The system furthermore featured automatic guidance to the target, enabling evasive action immediately after missile launch. Alternatively, the system was also compatible with Ataka laser-guided anti-tank missiles.
Other weapon options included laser- or TV-guided Kh-25 missiles as well as iron bombs and napalm tanks of up to 500 kg (1.100 lb) caliber and several rocket pods, including the S-13 and S-8 rockets. The "dumb" rocket pods could be upgraded to laser guidance with the proposed Ugroza system. Against helicopters and aircraft the РТАК-30 could carry up to four R-60 and/or R-73 IR-guided AAMs. Drop tanks and gun pods could be carried, too.
When the РТАК-30's proprotors were perpendicular to the motion in the high-speed portions of the flight regime, the aircraft demonstrated a relatively high maximum speed: over 300 knots/560 km/h top speed were achieved during state acceptance trials in 1987, as well as sustained cruise speeds of 250 knots/460 km/h, which was almost twice as fast as a conventional helicopter. Furthermore, the РТАК-30’s tiltrotors and stub wings provided the aircraft with a substantially greater cruise altitude capability than conventional helicopters: during the prototypes’ tests the machines easily reached 6,000 m / 20,000 ft or more, whereas helicopters typically do not exceed 3,000 m / 10,000 ft altitude.
Flight tests in general and flight control system refinement in specific lasted until late 1988, and while the vintoplan concept proved to be sound, the technical and practical problems persisted. The aircraft was complex and heavy, and pilots found the machine to be hazardous to land, due to its low ground clearance. Due to structural limits the machine could also never be brought to its expected agility limits
During that time the Soviet Union’s internal tensions rose and more and more hampered the РТАК-30’s development. During this time, two of the prototypes were lost (the 1st and 4th machine) in accidents, and in 1989 only two machines were left in flightworthy condition (the 5th airframe had been set aside for structural ground tests). Nevertheless, the РТАК-30 made its public debut at the Paris Air Show in June 1989 (the 3rd prototype, coded “33 Yellow”), together with the Mi-28A, but was only shown in static display and did not take part in any flight show. After that, the aircraft received the NATO ASCC code "Hemlock" and caused serious concern in Western military headquarters, since the РТАК-30 had the potential to dominate the European battlefield.
And this was just about to happen: Despite the РТАК-30’s development problems, the innovative attack vintoplan was included in the Soviet Union’s 5-year plan for 1989-1995, and the vehicle was eventually expected to enter service in 1996. However, due to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the dwindling economics, neither the РТАК-30 nor its civil Mil Mi-30 sister did soar out in the new age of technology. In 1990 the whole program was stopped and both surviving РТАК-30 prototypes were mothballed – one (the 3rd prototype) was disassembled and its components brought to the Rostov-na-Donu Mil plant, while the other, prototype No. 1, is rumored to be stored at the Central Russian Air Force Museum in Monino, to be restored to a public exhibition piece some day.
General characteristics:
Crew: Two (pilot, copilot/WSO) plus space for up to three passengers or cargo
Length: 45 ft 7 1/2 in (13,93 m)
Rotor diameter: 20 ft 9 in (6,33 m)
Wingspan incl. engine nacelles: 42 ft 8 1/4 in (13,03 m)
Total width with rotors: 58 ft 8 1/2 in (17,93 m)
Height: 17 ft (5,18 m) at top of tailfin
Disc area: 4x 297 ft² (27,65 m²)
Wing area: 342.2 ft² (36,72 m²)
Empty weight: 8,500 kg (18,740 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 12,000 kg (26,500 lb)
Powerplant:
4× Klimov VK-2500PS-03 turboshaft turbines, 2,400 hp (1.765 kW) each
Performance:
Maximum speed: 275 knots (509 km/h, 316 mph) at sea level
305 kn (565 km/h; 351 mph) at 15,000 ft (4,600 m)
Cruise speed: 241 kn (277 mph, 446 km/h) at sea level
Stall speed: 110 kn (126 mph, 204 km/h) in airplane mode
Range: 879 nmi (1,011 mi, 1,627 km)
Combat radius: 390 nmi (426 mi, 722 km)
Ferry range: 1,940 nmi (2,230 mi, 3,590 km) with auxiliary external fuel tanks
Service ceiling: 25,000 ft (7,620 m)
Rate of climb: 2,320–4,000 ft/min (11.8 m/s)
Glide ratio: 4.5:1
Disc loading: 20.9 lb/ft² at 47,500 lb GW (102.23 kg/m²)
Power/mass: 0.259 hp/lb (427 W/kg)
Armament:
1× 30 mm (1.18 in) 2A42 multi-purpose autocannon with 450 rounds
7 external hardpoints for a maximum ordnance of 2.500 kg (5.500 lb)