Air and Space Photos from Alternate Worlds.

Screenshots from the game Kerbal Space Program with my attempts to build a Saturn V 4(x)U

At first I had issues with the first-second stage separation

screenshot66.jpg

screenshot70.jpg

screenshot71.jpg


Eventually I got it to work reliably
screenshot94.jpg

screenshot78.jpg

screenshot80.jpg


All up
screenshot63.jpg


With stretched first stage tanks (actually I just added extra 2nd stage tanks on top of 1st stage tanks)
SV-4XU.jpg

screenshot95.jpg


With custom stats the lift-off mass was 778 mass units (which is a whopping amount in the game) Each first stage tank weighed 90 units.

This is from an older version, they changed the physics and that much mass became uncontrollable.
 
is they one S-II stage on those 4 booster's or is they 2?


any chance getting a shot of just one of those 4 booster's by themselves? (all the stages together?)


kool pic's. thanks for sharein'.:cool:


orbiter 2010 screen shot pic that i found online.

SaturnsSplashx.jpg
 
is they one S-II stage on those 4 booster's or is they 2?


any chance getting a shot of just one of those 4 booster's by themselves? (all the stages together?)


kool pic's. thanks for sharein'.:cool:


orbiter 2010 screen shot pic that i found online.

In the first version, each of the boosters consists of a standard Saturn V from 1st to 3rd Stage. The 'stretched' version has a 1st stage tank topped with a 2nd stage tank as the first stage, a standard 2nd stage, and the 3rd stage.

The center body is a 2nd stage, 3rd stage, and Command & Service Module.
 
It's a full Saturn V, lofted by the first and second stages of four more Saturn Vs.

that last shot looks like the S-IC stage is missing from the core Saturn V and the 4 booster's look like they have an extra S-II each.

~never mind~
 
britfighter.png

*Note: i am not, neither do i claim, to be an aerospace engineer. this design probably wouldn't fly in the real world, but i think it looks cool :)*

NuHawker F(A).5 Hurricane II Multirole Fighter

The election of the Fleet government and the XXI naval strategy review were a great boon to the Royal Navy. With the Fleet government's "Sea first" defence policy, the XXI reviews stressing the importance of maintaining sea control, and the growing importance of the Falklands and Ascension resource zone to the UK's economic boom, the navy found itself receiving the lions share of the defence budget (some 70% in the first few years). The strategic readjustment resulted in the reduction of the active army by 60%, and the downsizing of the Royal Air Force into little more than a local air defence unit. From this point, the Navy would handle all major expeditionary and defence activities.

What followed was one of the largest and fastest fleet build ups in recent history. The Navy begun a massive shipbuilding program, with top on their list, the modification of their existing carriers into Cat and trap units, and the construction of two more carriers. Also on the shopping list was a new carrier borne fighter to serve off these ships.

With front line air defence now firmly in the Navy's court, the Admiralty wanted a new, top of the line air superiority fighter to fly off their new flat tops. Several contenders, including the latest variants of the F-35 and Rafale, were considered and rejected as lacking in requirements. The Admiralty considered developing a completely new fighter, a costly yet achievable goal in the light of their new budget, and several designs were submitted by both British and foreign companies. The Admiralty settled on NuHawker and their design, the Hurricane II (a surprising move, since the Hurricane was the least developed of the designs submitted. It should be noted for completeness that several of those on the selection board latter took executive positions at NuHawker)

Development of the Hurricane II began in earnest, utilising the latest in computer technology, rapid prototyping and in-field crowd-sourcing to reduce development times and costs. Even using such advanced techniques, the Hurricane II project was delayed twice, and went over budget at least three times during its developmental cycle. despite this, NuHawekr managed to produce a prototype after seven years that was "at 80% capacity", with a full production model flying six months latter. Eight years after development began the Hurricane II was accepted into the Royal Navy as the F(A). 5.


The Hurricane II is a unique design, with its dorsal air intake and wing-tip vertical stabilisers. The intakes contain doors that close while the craft is on the ground to reduce the chance of FOD ingestion and allow the pilot to enter and exit the cockpit while the engines are running. The two engines are capable of putting out 60 kN of thrust each, and utilise thrust vectoring. The Hurricane II is capable of cruising at Mach 1.6 without afterburner, with a range of 1,200 km up to 2,300 kilometres at lower cruising speeds.


Sensors include a BASL MANDOLIN fixed ASEA radar forward, a smaller ASEA RWR above the engines, a distributed IR detection system, and a forward looking electro-optic system with integrated laser designator under the nose.
As well as onboard sensors, the Hurricane II has a full MARATHON data-link and is fully integrated into the Royal Navy's UMPIRE battlefield management system.

Primary weapons carriage is in the Hurricane II's two weapons bays, with four wing mounted pylons also available. Although primarily designed for air superiority missions, the Hurricane II was designed from the outset to be capable of Multirole missions. The primary anti air load-out consists of 6 Comet BVR missiles and two NGSAAM short range missiles. For ground strike missions, the Hurricane II can carry a variety of bombs, the most common load-out consisting of four PAVEWAY VII laser and GPS guided 500 lb. bombs. For surface strike missions against ships and long range land targets, the Hurricane can carry two Naval Air Strike cruise missiles. Larger missiles can also be carried on the external pylons.

With its many features and strengths, it was unfortunate that the Hurricane II's début was to be during the fiasco that was the first "Falkvinas" conflict. Although the Hurricane II easily outmatched the outdated Typhoon F4 fighters operated by the Falkvinas rebels, restrictive rules of engagement, issues with the UMPIRE management system and obstructive attempts by the admirals back in England to micromanage the whole campaign meant the Hurricane II never got to be utilised to its full potential. The Hurricanes only ever engaged in air combat once, towards the beginning of the conflict, a poor battle that, due to the glitches that plagued the UMPIRE system at the start of the conflict, resulted in a tie, two Hurricanes lost for two Typhoons. The Hurricanes would never meet the Typhoon in battle again, with most Hurricane assigned to bombing runs and over fleet CAP duty. 8 Hurricanes were lost by the time the British fleet retreated.

The Royal Navy operated 152 Hurricanes, equipping six front line squadrons, two stone frigate squadrons, two reserve squadrons and and two flights.

britfighter.png
 

Kissinger

Banned
Screenshots from the game Kerbal Space Program with my attempts to build a Saturn V 4(x)U

At first I had issues with the first-second stage separation

screenshot66.jpg

screenshot70.jpg

screenshot71.jpg


Eventually I got it to work reliably
screenshot94.jpg

screenshot78.jpg

screenshot80.jpg


All up
screenshot63.jpg


With stretched first stage tanks (actually I just added extra 2nd stage tanks on top of 1st stage tanks)
SV-4XU.jpg

screenshot95.jpg


With custom stats the lift-off mass was 778 mass units (which is a whopping amount in the game) Each first stage tank weighed 90 units.

This is from an older version, they changed the physics and that much mass became uncontrollable.
How many died for that to work?
 
With all the weird steam-punk and airship stuff floating around, I have to ask: is there no love for the ornithopter? I don't remember seeing a single picture of one of these things here.
 
smallbritfighter.png

NuHawker F(A). 4 Kestrel Multirole Fighter

The small, speedy Kestrel was a key component of one of the more unique and radical designs adopted by the Royal Navy during the fleet revival; The Cruiser-Carrier. The Cruiser-Carrier concept was developed to provide even the smallest naval task-force a modicum of air power. At just 185 meters long, these vessels would carry a small force of fighters, drones and helicopters. the most unique part of the Cruiser-Carrier was the fact its was a "Cat and Trap" type; experience with VTOL aircraft had shown that while flexible and effective, conventional aircraft were still preferable.

For these "micro-carriers" a new, smaller fighter was required. The Navy put out tenders for the new design, and NuHawker quickly responded with the "Kestrel", an aircraft it claimed was designed from the start to operate from very small ships. The Kestrel was selected for development, and within two years a production prototype was flying.

The Kestrel was a somewhat controversial design. Despite NuHawker's claims that the Kestrel was a completely new design, anyone with even a modicum of knowledge of military aircraft could see that it was at least based of the SAAB Gripen. Combined with its extremely short development time, it lead to rumours that NuHawker had stolen the design or at least parts of the design from SAAB. SAAB would actually challenge NuHawker in court, claiming that Kestrel was illegally based on the Gripen. The claims were dismissed in court, after an investigation found the similarities of the two aircraft were cosmetic at best.

The Kestrel was a small, compact fighter, designed to operate off cramped flight decks and small hangers. Its small size meant that even a small I-Class Cruiser-Carrier could carry at least ten, however only five were usually carrier as part of a mixed flight group. The Kestrel had a combat range of 800 km, and had a max speed of Mach 1.4. The Kestrel is capable of deploying from any "cat and Trap" vessel, and in fact was the main carrier-borne aircraft for the Navy's supercarriers until the arrival of the Hurricane.

The Kestrel has a total of 9 hard-points, two on each wing, two wing-tip points, one centreline and two underneath the engine intakes. The wing-tip stations are used for NGSAAM air to air missiles, while the under intake hard points are usually used for targeting or electronic warfare pods. The four wing stations can accept missiles or bombs, with a standard air to air load consisting of four Comet missiles. The ground attack weapons most commonly used is the PAVEWAY VII 500 lb bomb. the centreline station is most commonly used for a drop tank, although the station can also be used for carriage of cruise missiles and Jamming pods.

The Kestrels main sensors include a BSAL MINSTREL light ASEA radar and a forward looking electro-optic IR sensor. A dorsal mounted 360 IR threat detector incorporates the UMPIRE downlink. As well as UMPIRE, the Kestrel can carry additional Command/Control pods for linking with SeaSword UCAVs. A standard CAP off an I-class would consist of a Kestrel leading two UCAV's.

The Kestrel has seen service in numerous conflicts, including the Pitcairn Emergency, the Zimbabwe conflict and the Suez emergency. The Kestrel bore the brunt of the air war during the Falkvinas Conflict; the Kestrel flew more sorties and had a higher success rate than any other Royal Navy combat aircraft. 5 Kestrels, part of the ill-fated "20 flight" from the cruiser carrier Illustrious, were the first casualties of the conflict, when all five aircraft were shot down by a flight of Falkvinas Typhoons soon after the revolt began. By the end of the conflict, 23 Kestrels had been shot down, 10 in air to air combat, 13 to ground fire, yet also scored 8 air-to air kills, and were directly responsible for sinking two Falkvinas corvettes, two frigates and a destroyer.

The Royal Navy operated 200 Kestrels, equipping 11 front line squadrons, 1 stone frigate squadron and two reserve squadrons.

smallbritfighter.png
 
Last edited:

VT45

Banned
I wanted to put this here so I don't forget about it. I'm working on a route map for Narragansett Air, which can also double as an advertisement for the airline. And part of it shows the different kind of planes that the company uses, including to-scale diagrams (see attachment below). And I also wanted to post the slogan I came up with for the airline as well so I don't forget it:

A story begun with Narragansett Air

narragansettair.png
 
I wanted to put this here so I don't forget about it. I'm working on a route map for Narragansett Air, which can also double as an advertisement for the airline.

Ha ! I remember this picture. :D Well done. :cool: I also like the name of the airline - fitting for New England's history. Makes me want to start drawing civilian planes as well (I have a VIP government transport in the works, so I guess that could be a start of sorts).
 
I wanted to put this here so I don't forget about it. I'm working on a route map for Narragansett Air, which can also double as an advertisement for the airline. And part of it shows the different kind of planes that the company uses, including to-scale diagrams (see attachment below). And I also wanted to post the slogan I came up with for the airline as well so I don't forget it:

A story begun with Narragansett Air

that paint job would look great on a B-17G.
 
Top