AHC: With a generous butterfly net, what's the latest or least "destructive" PoD that'll lead for Japan to buy Alaska from Russia in the 19th century?

I know that this is quite the tall order, but let's just say that I'm really interested with the hijinks that this will cause.

The butterfly net, while not absolute, will take effect as much as it can help it especially outside of Japan's other imperialistic endeavours that will help fund this.
 
One POD I honestly think is impossible, because you're looking to:
- avoid Russia doing better so that it doesn't want to keep it
- avoid the USA or somebody else buying it
- avoid the UK seizing it
-Japan actually being interested in Alaska
 
One POD I honestly think is impossible, because you're looking to:
- avoid Russia doing better so that it doesn't want to keep it
- avoid the USA or somebody else buying it
- avoid the UK seizing it
-Japan actually being interested in Alaska
I'm not necessarily looking for a single one, but the least amount of it, especially outside of Japan; Japan may get a better time doing a less astringent Sakoku, though it should not affect history outside of its region as much as it can help it.
 
One POD I honestly think is impossible, because you're looking to:
- avoid Russia doing better so that it doesn't want to keep it
- avoid the USA or somebody else buying it
- avoid the UK seizing it
-Japan actually being interested in Alaska
Getting the US not to buy Alaska is not too hard; just have Seward's Folly struck down by Congress or the US losing the Civil War in the first place. IOTL Russia has already considered Alaska to be a frozen wasteland not worthy of keeping. The UK is the one wild card here, but I still doubt that Russia would ever sell Alaska to an adversarial Britain. Now the real elephant in the room is how to give the Japanese an incentive to be interested in Alaska, especially when they were more interested in expansionism in Asia than the Americas.
 
Have Alaska included in the Treaty of Shimoda(1855) as compensation for sovereignty over Sakhalin and the Kuril islands.
This is the perfect answer, seriously, it is also far enough back that it could be considered a condominium in which the Japanese slowly become more involved with the administration of and come the presumed Russo-Japanese War it could become fully Japanese owned, maybe the panhandle and some other bits could be used in trade with Great Britain (on behalf of Canada and maybe Australia?) In some form of horsetrading over post-WW1 spoils, etcetera.
 
Have Alaska included in the Treaty of Shimoda(1855) as compensation for sovereignty over Sakhalin and the Kuril islands.
This is the perfect answer, seriously, it is also far enough back that it could be considered a condominium in which the Japanese slowly become more involved with the administration of and come the presumed Russo-Japanese War it could become fully Japanese owned, maybe the panhandle and some other bits could be used in trade with Great Britain (on behalf of Canada and maybe Australia?) In some form of horsetrading over post-WW1 spoils, etcetera.
Does Japan have the amount of gold that will be acceptable to the Russians though? And won't Alaska be largely useless anyway as the Russians largely control the way there with their possession and development of the ceded islands?

That said - this concept is interesting as a solution since this only necessitates the military strengthening of Japan and earlier brinkmanship with Russia. The fallout of its prerequisites are way more easier to stem with the butterfly net compared to making Japan an early imperialistic power.
 
Last edited:
The best way for this occur in my opinion is for Japan to end its isolation earlier. Perhaps in the 18th century Japan slowly increases its contacts with Russia. That could work.
 
The problem is, if Russia considers Alaska to be useless, why would Japan want it?

And if Russia doesn't consider it to be useless, why would it agree to sell it - either to Japan or anyone else?
 
The best way for this occur in my opinion is for Japan to end its isolation earlier. Perhaps in the 18th century Japan slowly increases its contacts with Russia. That could work.
On this topic, I had in mind a concept similar to @The Gybson Boy's The Chrysanthemum Under the Cross: Christian Japan's Timeline, this POD might be too early for the liking of OP, but anyways, here is what I have in mind:
  1. 16th century Japan converts to Roman Catholicism in a gradual, and more peaceful manner, so the Shimabara Rebellion never occurs, since Catholics are already tolerated and growing even more influential as time goes on, so Japan never isolates itself, and allies itself to Portugal and Spain, unifying the country and becoming an empire almost 300 years earlier than OTL.
  2. Since most of the Pacific islands in the southern coast of Okinawa are already under the domination or influence of other rival empires, and after repeatedly failed invasions of Korea and China much like OTL, Japan gives up on trying to conquer anything south of Honshu and already-existing empires, looking to change their strategy, Catholic Japan gets inspired by the deeds and strategies of their Portuguese and Spanish allies in the Americas, so they start to focus on conquering and evangelizing the "uncivilized barbarians" of the far north instead.
  3. Japan does its own Portuguese-styled "civilizing mission" Christianization campaigns in northern Honshu and Hokkaido, to forcibly convert and assimilate the Ainu earlier than OTL, after Hokkaido is conquered much earlier, Japan continues its northward imperial conquests, conquering Sakhalin, the Kurils, and the Kamchatka Peninsula before Russia itself.
  4. Therefore, with a smaller Russia with a diminished presence in the Far East, and Japanese (and to a lesser extent allied Portuguese and Spanish Jesuit) strongholds and settlements in Kamchatka, Japan simply arrives in Alaska earlier than Russia does.
  5. Now you have a Jesuit-dominated Roman Catholic Japanese Alaska! (that in my mind its borders and history are drastically different from OTL Russian Alaska)
 
Last edited:
On this topic, I had in mind a concept similar to @The Gybson Boy's The Chrysanthemum Under the Cross: Christian Japan's Timeline, this POD might be too early for the liking of OP, but anyways, here is what I have in mind:
  1. 16th century Japan converts to Roman Catholicism in a gradual, and more peaceful manner, so the Shimabara Rebellion never occurs, since Catholics are already tolerated and growing even more influential as time goes on, so Japan never isolates itself, and allies itself to Portugal and Spain, unifying the country and becoming an empire almost 300 years earlier than OTL.
  2. Since most of the Pacific islands in the southern coast of Okinawa are already under the domination or influence of other rival empires, and after repeatedly failed invasions of Korea and China much like OTL, Japan gives up on trying to conquer anything south of Honshu and already-existing empires, looking to change their strategy, Catholic Japan gets inspired by the deeds and strategies of their Portuguese and Spanish allies in the Americas, so they start to focus on conquering and evangelizing the "uncivilized barbarians" of the far north instead.
  3. Japan does its own Portuguese-styled "civilizing mission" Christianization campaigns in northern Honshu and Hokkaido, to forcibly convert and assimilate the Ainu earlier than OTL, after Hokkaido is conquered much earlier, Japan continues its northward imperial conquests, conquering Sakhalin, the Kurils, and the Kamchatka Peninsula before Russia itself.
  4. Therefore, with a smaller Russia with a diminished presence in the Far East, and Japanese (and to a lesser extent allied Portuguese and Spanish Jesuit) strongholds and settlements in Kamchatka, Japan simply arrives in Alaska earlier than Russia does.
  5. Now you have a Jesuit-dominated Roman Catholic Japanese Alaska! (that in my mind its borders and history are drastically different from OTL Russian Alaska)
Gorgeous concept!
 
Would the UK and the US look to prevent Japan from settling a territory in North America? This was the era of the yellow peril.
The Yellow Peril would be kicked up to 11, ignoring that Alaska is an isolated backwater even after the discovery of gold. The Japanese population in Alaska (Arasuka?) today would be at most a few million IMO.
 
On this topic, I had in mind a concept similar to @The Gybson Boy's The Chrysanthemum Under the Cross: Christian Japan's Timeline, this POD might be too early for the liking of OP, but anyways, here is what I have in mind:
  1. 16th century Japan converts to Roman Catholicism in a gradual, and more peaceful manner, so the Shimabara Rebellion never occurs, since Catholics are already tolerated and growing even more influential as time goes on, so Japan never isolates itself, and allies itself to Portugal and Spain, unifying the country and becoming an empire almost 300 years earlier than OTL.
  2. Since most of the Pacific islands in the southern coast of Okinawa are already under the domination or influence of other rival empires, and after repeatedly failed invasions of Korea and China much like OTL, Japan gives up on trying to conquer anything south of Honshu and already-existing empires, looking to change their strategy, Catholic Japan gets inspired by the deeds and strategies of their Portuguese and Spanish allies in the Americas, so they start to focus on conquering and evangelizing the "uncivilized barbarians" of the far north instead.
  3. Japan does its own Portuguese-styled "civilizing mission" Christianization campaigns in northern Honshu and Hokkaido, to forcibly convert and assimilate the Ainu earlier than OTL, after Hokkaido is conquered much earlier, Japan continues its northward imperial conquests, conquering Sakhalin, the Kurils, and the Kamchatka Peninsula before Russia itself.
  4. Therefore, with a smaller Russia with a diminished presence in the Far East, and Japanese (and to a lesser extent allied Portuguese and Spanish Jesuit) strongholds and settlements in Kamchatka, Japan simply arrives in Alaska earlier than Russia does.
  5. Now you have a Jesuit-dominated Roman Catholic Japanese Alaska! (that in my mind its borders and history are drastically different from OTL Russian Alaska)
Interesting concept.
 
The Yellow Peril would be kicked up to 11, ignoring that Alaska is an isolated backwater even after the discovery of gold. The Japanese population in Alaska (Arasuka?) today would be at most a few million IMO.
Current population’s just below 735K, so a couple million would actually be quite impressive.
 
Getting the US not to buy Alaska is not too hard; just have Seward's Folly struck down by Congress or the US losing the Civil War in the first place. IOTL Russia has already considered Alaska to be a frozen wasteland not worthy of keeping. The UK is the one wild card here, but I still doubt that Russia would ever sell Alaska to an adversarial Britain. Now the real elephant in the room is how to give the Japanese an incentive to be interested in Alaska, especially when they were more interested in expansionism in Asia than the Americas.
I’d say: maybe give Japan earlier successes in its conquests.

Have Japan conquer Korea during the first invasion, and have Hideyoshi/Nobunaga unite the country, building it up into an industrial powerhouse.

With an population boom, they’ll settle Korea, but once that space is filled, they’ll be scrambling for new territory, and with the purchase of the Philippines a late century idea, the Japanese decide to focus on Alaska before that point.
 
The Yellow Peril would be kicked up to 11, ignoring that Alaska is an isolated backwater even after the discovery of gold. The Japanese population in Alaska (Arasuka?) today would be at most a few million IMO.
If we are going for a pre-19th century POD (like in my Roman Catholic Japan timeline, or an earlier unification of Japan and successful invasion of Korea in 1592 like how @Rafi_T said), then a non-European country adopting Christianity, becoming an European-allied overseas (therefore, not counting the Kingdom of the Kongo and Ethiopia, who were Christian empires, but had no overseas colonies), colonial empire in the 16th century, and industrializing way earlier than OTL, would result in a considerably less racist world than OTL, since non-Whites would have had imperial powers with equal standing with Europeans as early as the beginning of New World Colonialism itself, and also predating the 19th century wave of Nationalism, New Imperialism, and "racial science" by over two hundred years, of course not even counting the butterflies that a 16th century Empire of Japan would have caused throughout the rest of the planet.
 
This is the perfect answer, seriously, it is also far enough back that it could be considered a condominium in which the Japanese slowly become more involved with the administration of and come the presumed Russo-Japanese War it could become fully Japanese owned, maybe the panhandle and some other bits could be used in trade with Great Britain (on behalf of Canada and maybe Australia?) In some form of horsetrading over post-WW1 spoils, etcetera.

Does Japan have the amount of gold that will be acceptable to the Russians though? And won't Alaska be largely useless anyway as the Russians largely control the way there with their possession and development of the ceded islands?

That said - this concept is interesting as a solution since this only necessitates the military strengthening of Japan and earlier brinkmanship with Russia. The fallout of its prerequisites are way more easier to stem with the butterfly net compared to making Japan an early imperialistic power.
I would think that the resources that Alaska has to offer would offset a lot of the initial instability of the Meiji Era of Japan like logging, fishing, mining. Meaning they won't strapped for resources like in OTL.

Not to mention the fact that having such a faraway colony would give incentive on the Navy for the sake of logistics.
 
Last edited:
Top