You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
alternatehistory.com
Well, the American end of it, anyways. The challenge is to find a way that completely resolves the conflict (in the sense that there is a minimal risk of American ground forces being deployed to Southeast Asia and in particular Vietnam) prior to 1960. The "what-if" is, supposing that this occurred, what would happen? In particular:
Would Kennedy/Johnson (I assume Lee Harvey was not significantly affected by the war in his decision to assassinate the President) merely find another set of bad decisions to entwine the United States in an ultimately unpopular foreign conflict? Supposing not:
The Johnson administration's domestic agenda was badly hit by the political furor over and expenditures on the war. With those out of the picture, is his vision of a New New Deal more successful? Just bigger? And what about space, anyways?
The anti-war protests were a major factor in the social developments of the decade and following; with them presumably absent, what direction does what might loosely be called "hippie-ism" take? What about the various reactions to it?
Similarly, the war and the slow pace of economic development fueled a radicalization of civil rights later in the decade; will the absence of the former and possibly a somewhat more successful New New Deal affect this significantly? What cultural and political effects would this have?
Finally, the experience of Vietnam led to a substantial overhaul of many aspects of the military, from materiel to command. Without the war, which, if any, of these changes would occur, and what would the effects on the armed services be?