Suppose upon Cyrus' conquest of the Lydian Empire, Kroisos' Greek subjects give in to the Persian demands and rebel against their overlord. With their autonomy intact, they don't get into the conflict that escalated into what it did IOTL.
So, in the short run, we have a Greek Western Anatolia being able to flourish and prosper and even project its culture into the depths of the Persian Empire, and we have a mainland Greece not hindered by the unnecessary expenses of the wars in question, albeit divided into the myriad of small city states vying for hegemony over the region.
Question is... what about the long run, say, up until 200-ish BCE? What cultural and political implications does this have? Who's going to unite the mainland? Macedon or not, are there going to be Greek fantasies of conquering the Persian Empire, or any imperial ambitions at all outside of Greece?
So, in the short run, we have a Greek Western Anatolia being able to flourish and prosper and even project its culture into the depths of the Persian Empire, and we have a mainland Greece not hindered by the unnecessary expenses of the wars in question, albeit divided into the myriad of small city states vying for hegemony over the region.
Question is... what about the long run, say, up until 200-ish BCE? What cultural and political implications does this have? Who's going to unite the mainland? Macedon or not, are there going to be Greek fantasies of conquering the Persian Empire, or any imperial ambitions at all outside of Greece?