Officially, of course, Henry didn't "divorce" his wives, he just had the marriages declared null (meaning that they were never technically valid in the first place, and hence had no force). We tend to talk of him divorcing because the talk of annulment was never very convincing as anything more than a political/religious/legal fig-leaf, but I'm sure Henry would be able to get the English Orthodox Church to agree that his marriages to Catherine, Anne, Jane, Anne, and Catherine were all invalid, so Catherine Parr is actually his first wife, you see, and anybody who disagrees gets sent to the Tower.
Jane Seymour would be his first wife.If he declared his marriage to her null,then that would create problems for Edward VI.
 
Since she died, he has no need to do anything, you could remarry as many times as you wanted if you were widowed, the 3 marriage limit only counted divorces as far as I know.
 
The Crusaders cleared the way for the ERE to get back on their feet. Without the First Crusade, the Seljuks probably would have besieged Constantinople, and I don't think Alexios would have been able to get them out of this one.
The First Crusade helped,but it probably wouldn't have have been necessary. One author of a book I've read believed that Alexios could have eventually reconquered Western Anatolia on his own because the Turks were essentially overstretched after conquering so much territory in such a short time.
 
The catalyst for the First Crusade was Alexios I's request for aid from the Latin West. However it wasn't because the Seljuks were pounding on the gates of Constantinople and the crusade that happen wasn't what Alexios wanted.

Alexios spent the 1080s hanging on the skin of his teeth while he outlasted Guiscard and beat down the Pechenegs. He managed to win but he took a lot of losses in the process. At around this time a Latin lord on pilgrimage to Jerusalem (don't remember the name-pretty sure he was Flemish-would have to look him up) came through Constantinople and loaned Alexios 500 cavalry. So now at 1095 he's finally able to start thinking long-term rather than dealing with immediate crisis and he's looking at Anatolia. It's been overrun by the Turks but they've fractured into smaller states and are vulnerable. But to exploit that vulnerability Alexios needs more troops, like more of that Latin cavalry. He wants more contingents like that, effectively mercenaries he can use to enlarge his army. So he talks to Urban II as the guy best able to get his message spread throughout Latin troops but then the Pope goes way off script.

Now the crusaders did help Alexios' re-conquest of western Anatolia by taking Nicaea and winning the battle of Dorylaion. However the one Turkish emir, Chaka, who controlled a piece of western Anatolia and some Aegean islands he'd taken with his newly-created fleet, was completely untouched by those. And he was the only Turkish emir in a position to actually threaten Constantinople itself, because of that new fleet. The Byzantines smashed him all by themselves with no help from the crusaders.

In short, no first crusade doesn't mean that Constantinople falls 350 years earlier (disregarding butterflies from a potentially delayed/curtailed Byzantine re-conquest of western Anatolia).
 
Top