So, irl aflred the great is kijg worthy of the epithet “the great” he consolidated wessex, held of the vikings and laid the foundation of england. Now, what if Alfred drove the vikings out of the anglo-saxon lands and United the angles and saxons under one crown about a generation early?
Interesting WI. My two cents:
A generation early? Do you mean Alfred achieved what his son (Edward) and daughter (Æthelflæd) accomplished?
Or perhaps what his grandson (Athelstan) achieved?
Or perhaps the England that his great-grandson (Edgar) inherited? (Bear in mind England had been divided between Edgar and his older brother Eadwig for the previous two years…)
Certainly, militarily, Alfred could have achieved more but I’m not sure he could have progressed as far as Edward and Æthelflæd, let alone as far as Athelstan. A more rapid consolidation and expansion of Wessex under Alfred may have bled Wessex dry, leaving it over-extended … which would have left it vulnerable – not only to external
ie Danish threats but – internally.
Constant campaigning to rid the land of the Vikings – which is what it would take for it to happen in his lifetime – will probably mean some of those other things that made Alfred great are not developed properly. Law, education, promoting the concept of ‘England’ are things that need time.
Alfred may have been the only English king but Wessex was not the only English kingdom. The ‘free’ Mercian rump did not disappear until the death of Æthelflæd. Alfred earned a lot of brownie points by not incorporating ‘free’ Mercia into Wessex. Any attempt to incorporate it earlier will probably be resisted… will Æthelflæd be loyal to her husband (Æthelred) or her father?
If Alfred is successful as per the WI, I think the situation upon his death will be a lot more unstable. For example, will the revolt of his nephew (Æthelwold) gain more traction?