AHC: Tibet recieves diplomatic recognition

After the fall of the Qing Dynasty, the 13th Dalai Lama declared Tibet an independent state, and Tibet remained de facto independent until it was incorporated into the PRC in 1951. But despite its de facto independence, no other nation recognized Tibet as an independent state, nor did the Tibetans seek out such recognition.

Under what circumstances would some other nation be willing to recognize Tibet as an independent state?
 
If China never takes it and makes it clear that they have either moved on or will not be capable of taking it for a long time, someone will eventually recognize them.
 

BigBlueBox

Banned
Japan would and its puppets might recognize Tibet during the Sino-Japanese war. If that happens then the Europeans Axis could recognize Tibet too.
 
Best bet for this would be recognition by Britain after the 1904 Younghusband Expedition. IOTL Britain and Tibet agreed a fairly draconian treaty but it was practically unenforceable. In any case, in 1906 Britain came to an agreement with China on Tibet wherein it acknowledged Chinese suzerainty. Seems to me that there's a window in this period where Britain could have created a protectorate over Tibet and, in the process, recognized its independence from China. The biggest impediment would seem to be Britain wanting to do it in the first place. But seeing as how the whole expedition to Tibet was sparked by fears that Russia was plotting to extend its influence over Tibet, that would seem the best route for making Britain create the protectorate.

So how about this: Russia has a bit more involvement in Tibet, maybe an official mission or two makes contact with elements in the Tibetan government. Maybe that happens in combination with Russia using the 1896 agreement with China to push its interests in Central Asia as well as in Manchuria. That would create a driver for Britain to peel Tibet away from China rather than just making sure the Russians are kept out. So, when Britain gets twitchy over percieved Russian moves in Tibet and intervenes as IOTL, the resulting treaty establishes a British protectorate over Tibet. China would complain about it, but there's nothing they can do about it practically. There you go, Britain recognizing Tibet as an independent nation, albeit one under British suzerainty. Be intersting to see what happens to Tibet after Indian independence in this scenario.
 
If China never takes it and makes it clear that they have either moved on or will not be capable of taking it for a long time, someone will eventually recognize them.

Question is: Why China not takes that? Even if Nationalists win the civil war, China would anyway annex Tibet. China has seen the area as part of China since Ming Dynasty.

Japan would and its puppets might recognize Tibet during the Sino-Japanese war. If that happens then the Europeans Axis could recognize Tibet too.

Axis should win the war too. If they still lost, any recognition has not any meaning. No one wouldn't care that.
 
Chang did not want to annex. He wanted tribute and the right to create the religious elite.

Chiang felt no need to "annex" Tibet because to him it was already part of China. He would no doubt have allowed it much more autonomy than the PRC did, but he would still insist that it was part of China and would consider any foreign recognition of it as independent a hostile act.
 
But despite its de facto independence, no other nation recognized Tibet as an independent state, nor did the Tibetans seek out such recognition.
Well, there was this treaty, in which Mongolia and Tibet recognized each other. According to Wikipedia, there was some doubt about whether or not the Dalai Lama's representative had the legal authority to negotiate such a treaty, but I would say the treaty constitutes both a country recognizing Tibet as independent, and an attempt by Tibet to get another country to do so.
 
Well, there was this treaty, in which Mongolia and Tibet recognized each other. According to Wikipedia, there was some doubt about whether or not the Dalai Lama's representative had the legal authority to negotiate such a treaty, but I would say the treaty constitutes both a country recognizing Tibet as independent, and an attempt by Tibet to get another country to do so.

But Mongolia's independence was itself not internationally recognized until after World War II. In the 1915 Treaty of Kyahta "Russia and China recognized Outer Mongolia's autonomy (as part of Chinese territory); Mongolia recognized China's suzerainty; Mongolia could not conclude international treaties with foreign countries regarding political and territorial questions." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Kyakhta_(1915) Even the Soviet Union in 1924 nominally recognized Chinese sovereignty over Outer Mongolia. https://books.google.com/books?id=mhJY7VgEWTUC&pg=PA62
 
Top