Neither. It's just that history and modern warfare made militias obsolent. And that the founders could not know.
That's a dangerous road to go down though.
Well, there was not radio or television in the 1790's, so telecommunicantions should not be protected by the first or the fourth amendments. Since there were no computers, then we cannot know how they would have felt about email infiltrations and the like....
In the eighth, is the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment together or individually? Id est, is a cruel punishment allowed provided that it is not unusual, and is an unusual punishment allowed if it is not cruel?
Should the absence of religious fanatcism in the days of the framers mean that the government view the "wall of separation" in the same way the French Republic pretty tightly conforms to its official secularism?
Since labor unions did not exist in 1790, then surely the right to freely assemble was not meant for them, following your reasoning, of course.