AHC: Socialist Bonaparte

Okay. I know that this looks weird, but I was thinking of it for multiple reasons:

- Bonapartism can not be considered as a clear ideology. It was composed of multiple movements, including a right clerical faction and a left anticlerical faction...

- Napoleon III, even if I think that this is mere propaganda or a simple misconception of the word declared to be himself a "socialist"

- After loosing the support of the church (because of his Italian policy), Napoleon III searched new support in the workers' camp and enacted some social reforms

- The Second republic and the republicans had shot on the workers in June 1848, and in fact, the workers were open for other alternatives and many of them elected Napoleon in the "free" elections of 1848

Possible POD: During the June Days Uprising, Napoleon publishes an imprudent message in which he, although with some reserve, supports the workers against the "treason of their so-called representatives" and claims that "only a democratic government[1] can protect the people against the aristocratic greed". Even if the uprising is quickly repressed, the members of the National assembly get scared of a popular, authoritarian coalition of peasants, workers and bonapartist romanticists and, by a law, forbid him to run for any office in France and eventually send him into exile.

[1] That is, in Napoleon's tongue, an autocratic regime lead by one person.

While the republic elects a republican president (like Cavaignac), a majority of the French population is disillusioned by the republic and hopes for a bonapartist restoration. Napoleon III adapts his ideology to the claims of his supporters (little peasantry and the growing mass of workers) and prepares an uprising/coup d'etat to seize power in France...

What do you think of it?
 
It's a great idea. Of course, I'm suspending disbelief that he would formally call himself a socialist, but he has a good chance of being a dictator who happens to enact socialist policies. He might be able to cloak it as an Augustus-style proletarian dictatorship, where he is simply the principle proletarian de jure, but de facto a dictator.
 
It's a great idea. Of course, I'm suspending disbelief that he would formally call himself a socialist, but he has a good chance of being a dictator who happens to enact socialist policies. He might be able to cloak it as an Augustus-style proletarian dictatorship, where he is simply the principle proletarian de jure, but de facto a dictator.

Oh, wiki says hat he really did it in OTL (and if he is characterizing himself as socialist whith such policies, I think he would have no problems with the word socialist if he really enacted socialist measures).

Any other takers?
 
Napoleon III position on 'socialism' (a concept still vague and undefinished at his time) was more relevant of a kind of social paternalism.
If you want a more 'socialist' Bonaparte, you also have Prince Napoleon, the Emperor's cousin, a protector of Proudhon and Tollain, and who suggested and supported the delegation of a group of workers to England to meet foreign workers and set up the First International (under the second Republic, the 'far left' positions of Plonplon earned him the nickname of Prince of the Mountain ).
 
Top