AHC: Renewables-fueled Industrial Revolution

Yeah. Solar-thermal technology was definetly doable with off the shelf components of the mid-late 19th Century, unfortunately coal and oil were cheaper and just as easily available.

But if you're stuck in the tropics where coal isn't available and before oil is begin widely used, your only choice would be solar energy. And once you start refining solar-thermal technology to improve efficiency and start coming up with other ways to use it, I feel like it would create a positive feedback loop that could lead to running industry based on a practically infinite source. Imagine where we'd be if we had started seriously investing in solar energy in the 1800s.
 
Imagine where we'd be if we had started seriously investing in solar energy in the 1800s.

None of the great powers have a climate that would facilitate the development of a solar steam engine. In most of Europe and America it would only work for a few months of the year at best. An engine that only works when the weather is nice is useless for industrial purposes.
 
Someone explain to me how you invent a heat engine that doesn't rely on fire without the guy next to you going 'you know, starting a fire would make it so much simpler.'

Not to mention that it kinda skips a few iterative steps in the whole process.
 
None of the great powers have a climate that would facilitate the development of a solar steam engine. In most of Europe and America it would only work for a few months of the year at best. An engine that only works when the weather is nice is useless for industrial purposes.

Yeah, we'd need a medieval or maybe renaissance POD which would result in a europ-screw so that great powers could arise elsewhere.

Someone
explain to me how you invent a heat engine that doesn't rely on fire without the guy next to you going 'you know, starting a fire would make it so much simpler.'

Not to mention that it kinda skips a few iterative steps in the whole process.

Well, you'd probably start with wood-fired heat engines, and then once wood gets scarce, the choice becomes to either import coal or use solar power.

I'm thinking of southern India as the location of ttl's industrial revolution, although that's only because I'm a kim Stanley robinson fan and that's where it happened I'm years of rice and salt
 

It's

Banned
One, yes, the most common form of industrial power generation from around ~ 6000 BC on is a nice well wielded whip applied to someone fed barely enough calories to keep them alive. Worked from Rome to Yangtze bottom lands. Produced enough surplus to let philosopher kings and Great Men think precious thoughts in peace.
...of environmental sustainability;)
 

It's

Banned
Is there a way of having something similar to OTL's Industrial Revolution happen using some sort of renewable power supply? Wind, tidal, humans, it doesn't matter as long as it's not the sort of thing that'll run out.

(Fossil fuels can still be used, just as long as they aren't the main source of power.)

No. We wouldn't know how to renewably power an IR now, never mind in the 18th century.
The IR occurred because of economic imperatives, which precludes nearly all renewable energy sources, then as now.
 
the problem with solar power is that you have to be able to make good (and preferably large) mirrors that are also capable of withstanding the rigours of being continuously outside.
 
I'm thinking of southern India as the location of ttl's industrial revolution, although that's only because I'm a kim Stanley robinson fan and that's where it happened I'm years of rice and salt

Kerala has lots of potential for hydropower (in a TL where Travancore remains independent it could industrialise on hydropower in the late 19th C) but the trouble with solar and South India is the monsoon which would make sunlight access patchy throughout a third of the year.

As DominusNovus points out, burning stuff is a lot more intuitive.
 
Last edited:
You might have some success, actually, if electrical engines develop before steam engines.

I don't think it would be ASB for solar powered steam engines to be invented before 1850. The technology isn't the problem. What it need is a sizable industrial base powered by hydro/biomass in a area with no coal and high solar insolation.
 
I don't think it would be ASB for solar powered steam engines to be invented before 1850. The technology isn't the problem. What it need is a sizable industrial base powered by hydro/biomass in a area with no coal and high solar insolation.

An intrepid Swahili looking to increase cloth production perhaps?
 
I don't think it would be ASB for solar powered steam engines to be invented before 1850. The technology isn't the problem. What it need is a sizable industrial base powered by hydro/biomass in a area with no coal and high solar insolation.

You also have the fact that a lot of the early electricity research was tied to the power outputs of steam engines. As an experimental set up, you have something you can turn on and off. I imagine it'd be hard to do the basic research with an inconsistent kind of power.

Also, Swahilli is a trade language, not an ethnicity (I think).
 
You also have the fact that a lot of the early electricity research was tied to the power outputs of steam engines. As an experimental set up, you have something you can turn on and off. I imagine it'd be hard to do the basic research with an inconsistent kind of power.

Also, Swahilli is a trade language, not an ethnicity (I think).

The people who speak it as a native language also have a unique culture from their neighbors so I guess it's kind of both a language and an ethnic group.
 

jahenders

Banned
Actually, trees CAN potentially be sustainable, but only if they're used at a relatively low level.

And the result was that much of Western and Southern Europe was denuded of forest cover. Technically renewable, but not sustainable.
 
Could an intrepid Chinese entrepreneur start a plantation of fast-growing bamboo trees to power a factory?

Just don't have the energy content to run modern industry or even older industry. Also coal for example provides higher quality heat even if it had the same energy content because coal burns hotter.
 
Top