11.07. Defence and Offence, two side, of war.
As the recent raid on Taranto had shown it was not just the weight of bombs dropped and where you dropped them that mattered, it was also important to have available the right ordinance to do the most damage to the specific target . Under the auspices of the CSSOAO a number of sub committees had been set up. The Bombsight Committee was chaired by Patrick Blackett, the Bomb Damage Assessment committee, The Bomb Fusing committee and several others were all working on making Bomber Command more effective, whilst some of the Committees analysed enemy action for lessons learnt, others examined practical and scientific opportunities fo improvement, The secret minutes of these committees were circulated to the chairs of all the committees, in this way cross pollination of both thought and effort was maintained. A scientific mind completely dissociated with the problem under consideration often came up with a crucial insight. This kind of cooperate analysis had been a corner stone of the work at AMRE Bawdsey Manor, from the start of the RAF research effort in Cheltenham what had become, the Telecommunications Research Establishment, continued that ethos which had been epitomised by the ‘Sunday Soviets’ and discussions on and around the boundary during cricket matches at AMRS Bawdsey Manor. Upon arrival in Cheltenham in the late summer of nineteen thirty nine ‘Taffy’ Bowen and others had been delighted to be invited to play cricket on the College Fields.
In the summer evenings of 1940 it was not uncommon to see one or two games in progress in front of the school cricket pavillion with casual observers walking past having no inkling of the secracy of the discusions taking place on the boundry, Here a group might include Alec Harley Reeves, “ Frank “ Edgar Jones, Ronald Victor Jones, discussing Nickerbine and radio navigation, whilst nearby Bernard Lovell, Joan Elizebeth Curran, Samuel Crowe, James Sayers, ”Mark” Olithant and others. Who might be discussing magnatrons, proximity fuses or a myrid other related technicsl subjects. When Sir Phillip visited the TRE, He was unfailingly impressed with the intelectuall talent that had been mobalised from the scientific community . Now in late autumn as the days grew shorter the work on perfecting many of these new systems continued with a quite intensity.
Shortly after becoming CAS, Sir Hugh had been whisked off to Cheltenham to attend a number of presentations on the work being done at the TRE. Later behind locked doors Sir Phillip and Sir Hugh sat in the office of ‘Taffy Bowen’ whilst R.V. Jones, passed his transcript of the ‘Oslow’ letters to Sir Hugh to read. Having read them Sir Hugh had enquired as to the veracity of their content, Here Sir Phillip stated, was the problem, within certain circles of the British intelligence community, the ‘Oslow Letters’ were seem as being too detailed and wide ranging in their scientific detail of Nazi research and development to be true, these people had therefore dismissed the letters as a plant to mislead the British into wasting time and effort chasing phantom projects.
R.V. Jones countered by saying that he had as a scientist come to the opposite conclusion. In that the science within the letters, particularly on RDF and other electronics was fundamentally sound. Further all the scientific information was consistent with working practices and methodology of known German scientists and institutions. Summarising the letters R.V. Jones said that the British had been given by a disaffected German scientist a snapshot of German electronic secret research as of early 1940 and that it was being officially ignored by the Intelligence community. In the TRE however it certainly was not being ignored it was informing a lot of the work carried out by 80 wing and at same time the PRU were when possibly try to get photographic confirmation of the activity at some of the sites noted in the letter. As Sir Phillip commented in a war of ‘move and counter move’ having a crib sheet of your opponents moves could be invaluable.
R.V. Jones concluded, that in his capacity as the Goverments Advisor on Scientific Intellegence it was issential that as the, CAS, Sir Hugh should fully appraised of the contents of the Oslo Letters and the importance of this information, hence the briefing. The discussion then turned to use, by the Luftwaffe of Lorence based electronic bombing aids, these were known as ‘The Beams’ so far the scientists working at TRE and the RAF flying in 80 Wing had managed to identify the frequencies used and had worked out the methodology and expected accuracy. The crudest counter measure available was to simply jamb the tramitters with electronic noise. This would only serve to alert the Gremans to the fact that their wave lengths had been compromised,
The more sophisticated counter measure was to ‘spoof’ or bend the beams. The beam system known to the Germans as Knickerbien utilised a track beam with its transmitter near Kleve and a cross beam transmitted from Stollberg near the Danish border. By sending a series of dots synchronised to the original German signals it was possible to widen the track beam to such an extent that bombers would fail to lock on and wander on a curve away from the track. As Knickerbien was known as ‘headache’ to the British the counter broadcast system was code named ‘Asprin’.
The Oslo letter had contained details of a newer and more accurate guidance systems and the scientists at TRE and 80 Wing had been urgently seeking evidence of this new system that bore the name X-Gerat (X-Aperatus). The first use of X-Gerat had been on December 20th 1939 and since then much data had been collected, the new beam frequency had been found at 1500/2000Mhz, this was much higher than the original Knickerbein system at 60 Mhz, therefore giving a far more accurate and narrower beam. Intellegencce intercepts had confirmed that this new beam from a transmitter near Cherbourg had the code name Wesser, with the three cross beams being also named after rivers, namely the Rhine, Oder and Elbe. The Rhine cross beam was the preparety warning line approxemetly thirty kilometres before beam Oder, which was the clock setting line, five kilometres later was the Elbe beam line wich was the clock rundown start line and five kilometres later was the automatic bomb release point. Unlike Knickerbein, X-Gerat was not fitted in every bomber and top secret traffic analysis had confirmed that a bomber unit called KGR 100 was a specialised bomber Kampfgruppe set up to use this system for precision bombing of targets and to mark targets for following bombing waves. By early November much intelligence had been gained, a analysis of a raid by KGR 100 on Birmingham had shown that the majority of the bombs had fallen within a band one hundred meters wide centered on the Wesser Beam with a length spread of just over a furlong, accuracy almost unobtainable by the RAF even in daylight. This came as a shock and revelation to the RAF.
Having located the guide beams transmitter near Cherbourg the RAF and AM intelligence analysed the band variance for major targets in the midlands. Francis Chichester had made the point that spoofing X-Gerat during attacks on easily located targets such as Liverpool and the Whirrel on the coast would be pointless, but attacks on the industrial complexes around. Wolverhampton. Birmingham, Coventry and Castle Bromwich could be more easily spoofed convincingly by using decoy fires and flares. A number of sites to the south of these targets were selected and quickly prepared as decoys utilising the same equipment and methods as the already existing QF sites for decoy airfields, The spoofing system used to counter X-Gerrat, was to broadcast an artificial and early Elbe signal Only one kilometre after the Oder signal and hence causing the bombs to be automatically dropped some eight kilometres short of the target. For the British the biggest problem here was the Luftwaffe had learnt from the successful jamming of the Knickerbien system, due to how early it was turned on, and were now delaying the transmission of the Rhine, Oder and Elbe lines as long as possible. This therefore gave the counter measure teams a very short time to identify the true Elbe line and Spoof it.
On the 6th of November the RAF had an intelligence coup, a bomber from KGR 100 was brought down by a night fighter and crash landed on the beach at West Bay near Bridport. Despite the wrecked aircraft being submerged by the rising tide an RAF intelligence recovery team managed to salvage the X-Gerrat equipment. Examination of the apparatus at the TRE quickly confirmed that the working frequency was filtered to precisely 2000Mhz and any jamming signal had to ne very accurately tuned.
To counter the use of X-Gerrat during the next major raid on the midlands a comprehensive defense scheme had been planned. As soon as intelligence, being signals analysis or intercepts’, indicated that KGR100 were preparing for a raid and the Wesser transmition was detected in the Birmingham target area then the plan would be activated. The Night fighters would be concentrated on the lead element of the raid, this was to intended to disrupt KGR 100 and inflict casualties on it.
General Pyle at AA command had concentrated as many guns as possible south of the Birmingham Target area to help convince the German bomb aimers that they were truly approaching their designated target, Guns to the north would remain silent unless the true target area was breached. The next phase was general jamming on the 2000Mhz frequency to disrupt the X-Gerrat signal and make accurate bombing more difficult. This Jamming would hopefully also disguise the false Elbe signal and make it harder to counter. Finally false flares, fires and explosions on the ground under the false target point would be set off in a further attempt to convince the following attacking bomber waves to attack the decoy target. The last two kilometres of the bombing run would be on a known track along the beam at a constant altitude. General Pyle organised all the AA guns in the area of the spoof target with the range to engage aircraft on the track to do so. These guns would be director controlled using the new 25cm tacking and ranging RDF systems with their distinctive parabolic aerials designed by Bernard Lovell and his team.
Sometimes in warfare there is a synchronicity of events that if wtitten in a novel would be decried as unbelievable, the bomber raid on Coventry was one such event. The plan to spoof X-Gerrat had only been finalised on the eigth of of November. All of the various elements already existed and the recovery of a complete X-gerat unit two days earler was the icing on the cake.
So it was that the raid on Coventry on the night of the eleventh and twelve of November would see the next major confrontation it what had become known at the TRE and in the AM as ‘The Battle of the Beams’