That's pretty much impossible. Getting from the proto-industrial era to today took 250 years, to be very charitable. To be less charitable, make it 420 years, starting from the beginning of the Dutch Golden Age.
The basic problem is that you need to have some impetus for industrialization. In 17c Holland and in 18c England it was high wages; England also had cheap fuel, with various early industrial inventions involving burning coal in order to reduce labor requirements. The inventions that let you do new things, like travel overland faster than a horse or be able to fire guns accurately at long range, came later; initially it was about producing the same amount of stuff with less labor.
Early-16c Europe was underpopulated and had high wages. But it was still an agrarian, Malthusian economy, and once population recovered, wages fell. England was still marginal; the Low Countries were economically central, but needed to expend a lot of energy just to get Spain to stop trying to (re)conquer them.
You can plausibly spin a story in which the Dutch Golden Age doesn't lead to stagnation, but to further innovation. You're not getting 19c growth rates in the 18c this way, but since the Netherlands was richer in the late 17c than Britain was in 1800, you can get away with less initial growth. Probably this accelerates industrialization by around a hundred years, so today's tech level is achieved in the early 20c. Anything more advanced is ASB.