Very unlikely, but what if GOPers propose a package deal--making same-sex civil unions legal nationwide in exchange for banning same-sex marriage nationwide?How could the FMA pass with a POD after January 1st, 1990?
nyet AL - nye Gay .. AL BiAl Gay-da.
It's Obergefell, not Obergefall. Sorry, I'm being a Grammar Nazi here.The Supreme Court makes an Obergefall-style decision legalizing same-sex marriage in all fifty stars in 1994--two decades before the country is ready for it.
Very unlikely--but the only POD I can think of for getting to 67 votes in the Senate.
1994 would be a bigger republican landslide if the scotus legalized gay marriage, and would there be 33 democrats willing to take that positionIt's Obergefell, not Obergefall. Sorry, I'm being a Grammar Nazi here.
Also, even in this TL, the Dems might insist on making it a states' rights issue. Even back then, there was a serious possibility that Hawaii would legalize SSM.
It could go either way--just like it did with the Flag Burning Amendment.and would there be 33 democrats willing to take that position
That might sabotage the whole amendment, though. After all, gay people aren't the only ones who have butt sex.And if the religious right really gets ambitious, they could tack on a rider to the FMA that allows states to ban sodomy - I don’t think a federal ban on sodomy would fly but something that would stop the Lawrence decision in its tracks.
That might sabotage the whole amendment, though. After all, gay people aren't the only ones who have butt sex.
You would need the religious right to be strong enough to push America toward an extremely conservative viewpoint on sex. For what I described, a narrower ban on sexual activity between members of the same sex would fly better than a blanket sodomy ban.
For a blanket sodomy ban, turn AIDS loose on everyone and make it a disease of gays AND fornicators (and drug users, just for shits and giggles.) You might need a POD in the 80s or some ASB shit like AIDS mutating into something that kills you dead without any help from other diseases to pull it off, but the crux of the need is to make the religious right immensely powerful AND willing to restrict sex to within marriage - possibly even with an insanely strict “sex is for procreation and nothing more” mentality.
Pat Robertson becoming President in 1988 is a good start. Robertson re-elected and replaced in 1996 with someone as hard-line helps. Congress mirroring him in enough time would do it. Yes, this is Handmaid’s Tale-level shit here but it’s pretty much what the religious right could aspire to.