WWI:
i like the idea of multi-colonized australia for so many reasons, and it definitely makes war there more likely. probly french, british, and how about german lands granted in the 18th century after the help of german principalities given during the 7 years and american revolutionary wars. i guess that means earlier colonization of australia. also, whoever the aborigines side with would be interesting.
a north american battle front only needs the zimmerman telegraph to not be found. mexico joins axis powers and invades USA
s. america is more tricky. argentina will likely join the axis powers because they dont like GB (falkland islands). colombia might also in hopes of retaking panama. make brazil and the US bed-buddies, and then you have someone to fight argentina and colombia on a serious calibre.
WWII
assuming the entente powers win, this probly leaves dissolved german clames in australia. the german population there might give one side some pro-nazi sentiment, especially with those pesky aborigines
USA kicked mexico's ass. although, less american intervention in europe probably made the war in europe last longer, but after a speedy victory over mexico, the US troops over. But a vengeful mexican government would likely re-ally with a similarly spiteful germany. i see something like blitz krieg throughout central america before war kicks off
gran colombia retook panama, those bastards, but after the treaty was signed, colombia allowed american ships to pass through the canal, so no harm, no foul. argentina and brazil were basicly at a stalemate, and the tensions rose to the point where both were itching for a fight.
i like the idea of multi-colonized australia for so many reasons, and it definitely makes war there more likely. probly french, british, and how about german lands granted in the 18th century after the help of german principalities given during the 7 years and american revolutionary wars. i guess that means earlier colonization of australia. also, whoever the aborigines side with would be interesting.
a north american battle front only needs the zimmerman telegraph to not be found. mexico joins axis powers and invades USA
s. america is more tricky. argentina will likely join the axis powers because they dont like GB (falkland islands). colombia might also in hopes of retaking panama. make brazil and the US bed-buddies, and then you have someone to fight argentina and colombia on a serious calibre.
WWII
assuming the entente powers win, this probly leaves dissolved german clames in australia. the german population there might give one side some pro-nazi sentiment, especially with those pesky aborigines
USA kicked mexico's ass. although, less american intervention in europe probably made the war in europe last longer, but after a speedy victory over mexico, the US troops over. But a vengeful mexican government would likely re-ally with a similarly spiteful germany. i see something like blitz krieg throughout central america before war kicks off
gran colombia retook panama, those bastards, but after the treaty was signed, colombia allowed american ships to pass through the canal, so no harm, no foul. argentina and brazil were basicly at a stalemate, and the tensions rose to the point where both were itching for a fight.