Nah, Han Solo. The prequels are lesser movies for many reasons, and to my mind, one of the minor ones is the lack of a character who'd either morally ambiguous or conflicted between the other mains and his own issues.
What about Anakin?
Nah, Han Solo. The prequels are lesser movies for many reasons, and to my mind, one of the minor ones is the lack of a character who'd either morally ambiguous or conflicted between the other mains and his own issues.
off the top of my head, lose the stupid voice, lose the idiocy, lose the clumsiness, lose the crap CGI.
that said, was his purpose to be a lovable idiot? (like Homer Simpson) if so you can keep the idiocy and perhaps the clumsiness (only so much though)
Wait, what?George Lucas sticks the original and makes Jar Jar duel Yoda at the end of Episode II.
But thats fan theory, or not`? George Lucas didnt plan that for real?Darth Jar Jar theory.
There are some who think Lucas was honestly planning it, before changing his mind.But thats fan theory, or not`? George Lucas didnt plan that for real?
It's incredibly dumb. But I think it does address the fact that one of the (many) problems with the prequel was a lack of any established villain in between each movie.But thats fan theory, or not`? George Lucas didnt plan that for real?
Mostly good with big outburst. It's not really the same.What about Anakin?