AHC: make Britain reconquer the United States by military means

Whatever else you do, I think you need to make the US populace want reunion.

If the US doesn't want to actually be ruled from London, London isn't going to sign up for endless and expensive occupation even if it has the power to enforce that.
 
It's very hard to see happening. By 1840 the USA had a larger population then the UK, it was a vast nation of many different climates with a strong and stable government. It is far away and difficult to project power into, combined with far easier and more lucrative targets for the British.
No it didn’t. The US population in 1840 was 17 million. The UK population was 26 million. The Us population did not overtake Britain’s until 1860ish.
 
I think Britain could shave off parts of the United States, but the whole thing seems unlikely. Even an America that gets reined in through several unsuccessful wars of expansion and collapses in on itself into civil conflict is unlikely to be fully integrated under British rule. It's just too populous, if you consume it into even a bigger Canada it just ends up dominating it.
 
I agree that piecemeal is probably the way to go.
The war of 1812 provides the opportunity to get New England via the Hartford convention, Tecumseh's confederation as an ally, and Louisiana as a shared British-Spanish condominium which would be de facto British.

Then I think you need to wait a while. Each of these areas needs to become more developed, and the British Empire needs to ban slavery. Britain then can wage a propaganda war against the remaining US, condemning the ongoing enslavement of people. You could imagine something similar to the fugitive slave act in the early 1850s pushing the remaining northern states to secede. These Free States of America, could then fall into the British orbit like New England before them. Maybe they could be bribed with Ontario, and maybe whatever is left of Tecumseh's confederation, to becoming a dominion as well. The rump USA might be willing to let them go to preserve slavery unhindered, they might even expand into Cuba or Haiti.

After that I think there's only one viable route forward, and it's pretty unthinkable for its time, but not strictly impossible. Britain and its dominions would need to train and educate a leadership class of African Americans in anticipation of an alt equivalent of the civil war. So after 1865 there would be radical reconstruction, Freedman bureaus on steroids, and possibly a fairly large Exodus of the most racist elements of formerly American society. the British trained African American leadership class would guide this reformed state, we can call it New Africa, into the British sphere.

Each of these dominions would have a certain level of investment in Britain. An imperial federation would certainly help too. By 1865 New England would have been a Dominion or something like it for about 50 years, fear of the US reconquering it keeping it with Britain for most of that time. Louisiana would have grown as a British colony from the very beginning, at least outside of New Orleans. The free states would view their triumph over slavery as a shared victory with the rest of Britain, but would be racist enough to not want to join with new Africa as a single dominion. For the same reason it might take a while to get new Africa into the imperial federation, but I think it's at least possible that the gratitude would last long enough for the racist attitudes to be overcome, especially as new Africa becomes an economically more enticing federation member.

This is my attempt anyway
 
Last edited:
They recognized the British sovereign as their overlord
If that's the criteria then Canada, Australia, and New Zealand aren't independent nations today.

The line between 'dominion' and 'independent state' is so thin it might as well not exist. Saying they weren't independent because they used the British monarch as a purely ceremonial head of state is a bit ridiculous.
 
The Dominions could be argued to be puppet states of Britain before the Statute of Westminster in 1931 - but even then aside from foreign policy the Dominions just did their own thing - but after 1931 they were definitely not puppets and more British-aligned nations. Canada and South Africa voted to declare war on their own in WW2, Ireland - despite being a dominion/free state at the time did not do as such on their own will, and Australia and NZ - having not ratified the Statute of Westminster - was pulled in immediately - but even then, both countries did not ratify the Statute because of their own will, they believed that Britain would protect them from undue Japanese and American influence and/or aggression.

America becoming a dominion in a scenario of reconquest is unlikely, at least for the first few decades.
 
The best bet would be the US Constitution is never ratified and the United States continues to run under the Articles of Confederation.
1812 comes along and do United States still goes to war with Britain
United States a total basket case and an easy Conquest with the added bonus that the local population wouldn't care because the British would do a better job of running the country
 
I think if the US ended up splitting (maybe earlier civil war since slavery is a bigger issue) then Britain can swop down and make them protectorates or dominions (I doubt colonies since it would be too hard to maintain)
 
The best bet would be the US Constitution is never ratified and the United States continues to run under the Articles of Confederation.
1812 comes along and do United States still goes to war with Britain
United States a total basket case and an easy Conquest with the added bonus that the local population wouldn't care because the British would do a better job of running the country
Americans were more loyal to their states than their country at that time period, so far more likely than "Save us, Britain!" is for the various states to split off into independent countries.
 
No it didn’t. The US population in 1840 was 17 million. The UK population was 26 million. The Us population did not overtake Britain’s until 1860ish.

Clearly I need to stop trusting random Google searches.
According to the 1860 Census the population of the United States was 31.4 Million, the 1861 Census put the population of the United Kingdom at 29 Million, as close to equal as they would get*.

(*Try explaining that in a Civil War WI. At best the odds would be even. (Industrial output is a different story, the numbers are not America's friend there))
 
Need to start this POD with fewer distractions in Europe and the Indian Ocean.
Start shortly after the ARW when the new nation was still weak.
Send hundreds of British ships to blockade American ports. Send enough ships that three or more of them face any blockade-runner or privateer.
Only allow trade through a handful of American ports that remain friendly or luke-warm towards Britain.
Develop a compromise with Southern slave-owners to maintain part o f the old slave-based economy. Perhaps sell British machines (e.g. cotton-gin) to Southern states ????
 
Maybe slavery is a far bigger issue and US goes to civil war earlier (After cotton gin is invented, slavery is banned despite an increase in profits from it; Just spitballing here)
You could have the British demand an end to slavery in 1834 or earlier and America refuse.
So blockade of the USA followed by an invasion?
 
Need to start this POD with fewer distractions in Europe and the Indian Ocean.
Start shortly after the ARW when the new nation was still weak.
Send hundreds of British ships to blockade American ports. Send enough ships that three or more of them face any blockade-runner or privateer.
Only allow trade through a handful of American ports that remain friendly or luke-warm towards Britain.
Develop a compromise with Southern slave-owners to maintain part o f the old slave-based economy. Perhaps sell British machines (e.g. cotton-gin) to Southern states ????
That could also cut off the flow of new immigrants arriving in America too.
 
Top