Taking things a TAD too literal. If you are supporting a nation following in the steps of Ned Ludd, then you're correct (with many workers today loathing automation for stealing jobs or supporting a movement of work to cheaper labor abroad).
But if we're pushing the current use of the term, then it is technophobia and that is a rejection of modern advances because of what they would mean to humanity (something that Cambodia and the Taliban believed, stating that man was losing his connection to the natural order). The Nazis played on this using tradition and fear of an ever changing world (psychology, sexual liberalism, women's rights, etc.). Hell, Hitler dreamt of a return to pastoral life in the conquered east away from the decay of urbanization. Even Reagan used the godlessness and coldness of the Soviets (with their calculated collectivization and planned economy) as a rallying cry for good old American values of freedom from bureaucratic control and the use of theories and formulas.
A neo-luddite fears the changes technology brings; the alteration of the fabric of society seems an unraveling instead. A lot of cults use this.