AHC: Largest possible pre-modern war

Would it be possible to have a surviving wanked Western Roman Empire, a surviving wanked Eastern Roman Empire, a huge Chinese dynasty that has essentially become the analogue to the Mongol Empire by conquering most of Asia , and a super Gupta Empire that has almost all of India and some of Persia, all in one war?
?What is the Saying? Amaturers study Tactic, Professionals study Logistics.

Fredrick the Great's forces could fit in one side of a college football stadium, and most of his opponents would fit on the other side.

My Guessamate is that no historical political unit pre 1600's could support more than 200~250,000 Soldiers on Campaign [Garrison Soldiers are different].

So given your 4 Empires -- my guess is max of 3/4 ~ 1 Million Troops in any war.
 
Tactics, with a s.

And surviving Romans can probably develop the things Louis XIV used for his armies faster.

Don't know squat on how the Asian states would do, but I don't see what prevents them from it.

Advanced technology isn't the problem nearly as much as infrastructure. To put it this way, how many wagons do you need to supply an army of 100,000 men? How many horses? How much fodder for those horses?

The costs are staggering, even assuming the materials and men are there.

On the issue of number of soldiers (according to the Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, for the years 1756/1760)

Britain: 200,000 (10.5 million)
France: 330,000 (21.5 million)
Habsburg Empire: 200,000 (18 million)
Prussia: 195,000 (6 million)
Russia: 330,000 (20 million)
United Provinces: 40,000 (1.9 million)

Rough population figures (given for 1750) are in () after the number of soldiers.

Not sure how many of these are "merely" garrison soldiers, but it ought to give an idea of what kind of manpower was raised and what size the states in question are - so I think the megastates in question can, assuming they have the money, support a great deal more. Money and supplies.
 
Last edited:
Top