Authoritarian nationalist without Jew hatred is not the same as national soxisociaDepends on what you mean by Italian-style, the Beer Hall putsch was Hitler imitating (or trying to) Mussolini's march on Rome.
True, Italian fascism wasn't as antisemitic until as Nazism until the late '30s when Germany was the senior partner in the alliance. However, Hitler was a large admirer of Mussolini in the early '20s.Authoritarian nationalist without Jew hatred is not the same as national soxisocia
True, Italian fascism wasn't as antisemitic until as Nazism until the late '30s when Germany was the senior partner in the alliance. However, Hitler was a large admirer of Mussolini in the early '20s.
It's difficult to understand fascism as an abstract ideology on paper or a coherent ideological package like communism rather than a street gang like unemployed X Color-shirt members who did more street-brawling than reading. A lot of fascism is about aesthetics and violence for violence's sake. When they were in power they generally made things up as they went along.
The Doctrine of Fascism, Mussolini's fascist manifesto, wasn't published until about a decade after the March on Rome. Their attitude to theory and laws was basically is basically summed up by the blackshirt slogan "me ne frego" (I don't care). Fascist are almost mirror opposites of marxists like Lenin who spent years writing books and pamphlets in exile or arguing about the declining rate of profit.
That would mean removing Hitler, ie the guy responsible for their rise in the first place. No Hitler, no Nazis.You would have to start with removing the anti-semitic wing of the NDSP before they gained the reins of control within the party. Not sure if that is possible without that particular group heading off on their own.
Fascism in Italy and Germany made democracy more likely in a sense by destroying the conservative order that helped them get to power. The argument in Ralf Dahrendorf's Society and Democracy in Germany is that fascism's rise to power paved the way for democracy (after fascism had been defeated, of course) by suppressing more reactionary groups like the church, landed gentry, and minor aristocrats. When fascism died it took the reactionary factions with it, and destroyed the socioeconomic basis for authoritarianism.Indeed. Philosophically, the Italian fascists claimed to be Hegelian(and according to Marcuse at least, didn't understand Hegel at all). The Nazis claimed to be anti-Hegelian(and according to Marcuse, did understand Hegel correctly).
And while anti-clerical, both the Italian fascists and the Nazis had no problem allying with the most reactionary religious factions(Petain etc) in other nations. Something you would NEVER have seen the Russian Communists doing.