Your mission if you choose to accept it is to find a way to maintain the independence of one of the Boer states, or if possible both of them.
The issue I take with the whole railway to delago bay is that at the end of the day Britian is still one of the biggest and most influencial markets in the world and in the case of the ZAR the British market is right on its doorstep. Market forces would push them toward Britain eventually, too many people in the ZAR have economic ties to the Cape and the other colonies and vice versa for them not to be big trading partners. Anti British nationalism in the ZAR was not economicallt rational and in the case of the Free State they are far more economicallu dependent on the CapeGranting the Boer states some sort of secure access to world markets other than through British territory might also help in securing their independence. I'd suggest having Britain and Portugal agree to give the disputed Delagoa Bay to Transvaal in 1872 as a sort of compromise.
I'm aware the British Cape was far too important for the ZAR to antagonize directly. The reason i brought up the possibility of a sea port under direct Boer control is that it might give the ZAR some more leverage, whatever it can get, to keep Britain at arm's length.The issue I take with the whole railway to delago bay is that at the end of the day Britian is still one of the biggest and most influencial markets in the world and in the case of the ZAR the British market is right on its doorstep. Market forces would push them toward Britain eventually, too many people in the ZAR have economic ties to the Cape and the other colonies and vice versa for them not to be big trading partners. Anti British nationalism in the ZAR was not economicallt rational and in the case of the Free State they are far more economicallu dependent on the Cape
There were more than two Boer states.