Ellis MacVey
Donor
Inspired by the fact that, at the time of WW1, the King of Britain, Kaiser of Germany, and Tsar of Russia were first cousins.
WW1 would be different than OTL. France would be going for Alsace-Lorraine so they would go war. Germany and Russia would profit the internal problems of Austro-Hungary and they would split in three parts the empire: Germany would annex Austria, Slovenia and Bohemia, Hungary would be a buffer state between Russia and Germany, the rest would be for Russia (or his allies like Serbia). The tsar wanted Constantinople so him and the british would remove some kebab. Bulgaria would join the Entente to avoid being neutralised by the other slav nations. Romania wanted only Transilvania so they would join the russians. Italy won't be betraying Germany. USA would be neutral, there was no point to support France, that had multiple fronts and less allies than Germany or Britain. Japan would join the Entente to expand further in China, so China would join the Triple Alliance. Belgium would let the germans pass so they would join the Triple Alliance. Here would be the WW1 sides:Inspired by the fact that, at the time of WW1, the King of Britain, Kaiser of Germany, and Tsar of Russia were first cousins.
I remember there was a thread on SpaceBattles with a scenario like this, and the conclusion was that Britain would be shooting itself in the face. The “Victorian Alliance” would definitely win against any other imaginable European alliance, but Britain would be screwed. There would be a massive GrossDeutschland occupying Antwerp, a “dagger pointed at the heart of England”. Russia would own the straits and compete with Britain for dominance of the Mediterranean, and without any enemies in Europe it could expand southwards and resume the Great Game.Inspired by the fact that, at the time of WW1, the King of Britain, Kaiser of Germany, and Tsar of Russia were first cousins.