Two final thoughts.
In cities with “good” mass transit you still have a situation where anyone that can drives, those that take mass transit do so because it either saves a LOT of time, saves a LOT of money or they just plan can’t drive because of no place to park. So in general even in cities with good mass transit people prefer to drive if they can. Presumably they have a reason.
My second point is that for almost all of recorded history we walked or rode an animal. Then we invented mass transit of various forms. And last we invented the car. If walking and mass transit were such great concepts and better the the car we would not have built so many cars. It is not like we went from no cars one day to cities and suburbs that required cars the next. There was a time when most cities where not designed for cars so people who did not have cars and used alternatives chose to buy cars. Presumably they had good reasons.
Yes, but those reasons also were shaped by the times. Cities were gaining a questionable reputation and people moved out to the suburbs because they saw it as a good way to start a family and having a car gave people a greater sense of autonomy over traveling.
However, at least with the US, due to its relative you, culture and various other factors, cities and towns were built with the idea of everyone having a car. The amount of everything changing because of that cannot be overstated, especially with the US.
Now, a car is now a mixed blessing st best. A lot of space is reserved for parking, highways and so on while cars come with their own sets of problems and inconveniences.
The car changed Americsn culture and shaped it drastically. Even now, there’s a lot of changes and most people feel they have to get one to get anywhere, so it’s become a necessary burden for a growing amount of people.
Delaying the car by several decades if you choose not to do away with it entirely could work since cities and modern lifestyles would get used to it and cars would be forced to adapt than the other way around.